Adaptive or non-adaptive? Cranial evolution in a radiation of miniaturized day geckos.

IF 2.3 Q2 ECOLOGY
Javier Lobón-Rovira, Jesus Marugán-Lobón, Sergio M Nebreda, David Buckley, Edward L Stanley, Stephanie Köhnk, Frank Glaw, Werner Conradie, Aaron M Bauer
{"title":"Adaptive or non-adaptive? Cranial evolution in a radiation of miniaturized day geckos.","authors":"Javier Lobón-Rovira, Jesus Marugán-Lobón, Sergio M Nebreda, David Buckley, Edward L Stanley, Stephanie Köhnk, Frank Glaw, Werner Conradie, Aaron M Bauer","doi":"10.1186/s12862-024-02344-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lygodactylus geckos represent a well-documented radiation of miniaturized lizards with diverse life-history traits that are widely distributed in Africa, Madagascar, and South America. The group has diversified into numerous species with high levels of morphological similarity. The evolutionary processes underlying such diversification remain enigmatic, because species live in different ecological biomes, ecoregions and microhabitats, while suggesting strikingly high levels of homoplasy. To underscore this evolutionary pattern, here we explore the shape variation of skull elements (i.e., cranium, jaw and inner ear) using 3D geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods on computed tomography scans (CT-scan) of a sample encompassing almost all recognized taxa within Lygodactylus. The results of this work show that skull and inner ear shape variation is low (i.e., there is high overlapping on the morphospace) across geographic regions, macrohabitats and lifestyles, implying extensive homoplasy. Furthermore, we also found a strong influence of allometry shaping cranial variation both at intra and interspecific levels, suggesting a major constraint underlying skull architecture, probably as a consequence of its miniaturization. The remaining variation that is not allometric is independent of phylogeny and ecological adaptation and can probably be interpreted as the result of intrinsic developmental plasticity. This, in turn, supports the interpretation that speciation in this group is largely concordant with a non-adaptive hypothesis, which results mainly from vicariant processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93910,"journal":{"name":"BMC ecology and evolution","volume":"24 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC ecology and evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-024-02344-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lygodactylus geckos represent a well-documented radiation of miniaturized lizards with diverse life-history traits that are widely distributed in Africa, Madagascar, and South America. The group has diversified into numerous species with high levels of morphological similarity. The evolutionary processes underlying such diversification remain enigmatic, because species live in different ecological biomes, ecoregions and microhabitats, while suggesting strikingly high levels of homoplasy. To underscore this evolutionary pattern, here we explore the shape variation of skull elements (i.e., cranium, jaw and inner ear) using 3D geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods on computed tomography scans (CT-scan) of a sample encompassing almost all recognized taxa within Lygodactylus. The results of this work show that skull and inner ear shape variation is low (i.e., there is high overlapping on the morphospace) across geographic regions, macrohabitats and lifestyles, implying extensive homoplasy. Furthermore, we also found a strong influence of allometry shaping cranial variation both at intra and interspecific levels, suggesting a major constraint underlying skull architecture, probably as a consequence of its miniaturization. The remaining variation that is not allometric is independent of phylogeny and ecological adaptation and can probably be interpreted as the result of intrinsic developmental plasticity. This, in turn, supports the interpretation that speciation in this group is largely concordant with a non-adaptive hypothesis, which results mainly from vicariant processes.

适应性还是非适应性?一组小型日壁虎的颅骨进化。
Lygodactylus壁虎代表了一种有充分记录的小型蜥蜴的辐射,它们具有多种生活史特征,广泛分布在非洲、马达加斯加和南美洲。这一群体已经分化成许多具有高度形态相似性的物种。这种多样化背后的进化过程仍然是一个谜,因为物种生活在不同的生态生物群系、生态区和微栖息地,同时表明了惊人的高水平的同质性。为了强调这种进化模式,在这里,我们利用三维几何形态测量学和系统发育比较方法,对Lygodactylus中几乎所有已知分类群的样本进行了计算机断层扫描(ct扫描),探讨了头骨元素(即头盖骨、颌骨和内耳)的形状变化。研究结果表明,在不同的地理区域、大生境和生活方式中,颅骨和内耳形状的变异程度很低(即在形态空间上有很高的重叠),这意味着广泛的同质性。此外,我们还发现异速生长在种内和种间水平上对颅骨变异有很强的影响,这表明颅骨结构存在主要限制,可能是其小型化的结果。其余非异速变异与系统发育和生态适应无关,可能被解释为内在发育可塑性的结果。这反过来又支持了这一群体的物种形成在很大程度上与非适应性假说一致的解释,这种假说主要是由代变过程产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信