Online Portal Use of Pathology Reports in Patients With Solid Tumors.

Amber Y Bo, Yee Chung Cheng, Ben George, Deepak Kilari, Jonathan R Thompson, Julie M Jorns
{"title":"Online Portal Use of Pathology Reports in Patients With Solid Tumors.","authors":"Amber Y Bo, Yee Chung Cheng, Ben George, Deepak Kilari, Jonathan R Thompson, Julie M Jorns","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2024-0327-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Patients can now immediately review pathology reports via online health portals.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To better characterize patient perceptions of pathology report helpfulness and preferences for access of pathology reports via a patient portal.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Semistructured interviews were conducted with oncology patients with breast, endocrine, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and thoracic malignancies. Patient demographic information, cancer type, question responses, and thematically grouped comments were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Among 230 patients, there was equal sex distribution (116 of 230, 50.4% female; 114 of 230, 49.6% male). Patients who viewed or had a support member view their reports in the portal (172 of 230; 74.8%) differed from those who did not (58 of 230; 25.2%) only in perception of helpfulness (P < .001) of the report. Difficulty understanding medical terminology was the most frequently cited challenge among both those who found the reports helpful (30 of 160; 18.75%) and not helpful (31 of 46; 67.4%). Most patients (196 of 230; 85.2%) preferred immediate release of results, even if the news was bad, whereas some (34 of 230; 14.7%) would opt out of immediate release for fear of misunderstanding (11 of 34; 32.4%) or receiving distressing information from reading the report (23 of 34; 67.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Options for portal flexibility (ie, patient choice of opting for immediate release of some, but not all, results), patient-centered pathology reports, educational materials, clinician preparation of patients, and tailored patient support are strategies that can help more patients benefit from reviewing pathology report information.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2024-0327-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Patients can now immediately review pathology reports via online health portals.

Objective.—: To better characterize patient perceptions of pathology report helpfulness and preferences for access of pathology reports via a patient portal.

Design.—: Semistructured interviews were conducted with oncology patients with breast, endocrine, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and thoracic malignancies. Patient demographic information, cancer type, question responses, and thematically grouped comments were statistically analyzed.

Results.—: Among 230 patients, there was equal sex distribution (116 of 230, 50.4% female; 114 of 230, 49.6% male). Patients who viewed or had a support member view their reports in the portal (172 of 230; 74.8%) differed from those who did not (58 of 230; 25.2%) only in perception of helpfulness (P < .001) of the report. Difficulty understanding medical terminology was the most frequently cited challenge among both those who found the reports helpful (30 of 160; 18.75%) and not helpful (31 of 46; 67.4%). Most patients (196 of 230; 85.2%) preferred immediate release of results, even if the news was bad, whereas some (34 of 230; 14.7%) would opt out of immediate release for fear of misunderstanding (11 of 34; 32.4%) or receiving distressing information from reading the report (23 of 34; 67.6%).

Conclusions.—: Options for portal flexibility (ie, patient choice of opting for immediate release of some, but not all, results), patient-centered pathology reports, educational materials, clinician preparation of patients, and tailored patient support are strategies that can help more patients benefit from reviewing pathology report information.

实体肿瘤患者病理报告的在线门户使用。
上下文。-:患者现在可以通过在线健康门户网站立即查看病理报告。-:更好地描述患者对病理报告有用性的看法,以及通过患者门户访问病理报告的偏好。-:对患有乳腺、内分泌、胃肠道、泌尿生殖系统和胸部恶性肿瘤的肿瘤患者进行半结构化访谈。对患者人口统计信息、癌症类型、问题回答和主题分组评论进行统计分析。-: 230例患者中,性别分布均匀(230例中116例,女性50.4%;230人中114人(49.6%男性)。查看或有支持成员在门户网站查看他们的报告的患者(230人中有172人;74.8%)与没有(230人中有58人;25.2%)仅在报告的“乐于助人”感知上(P < 0.001)。在发现报告有帮助的两个人中,理解医学术语困难是最常提到的挑战(160人中有30人;18.75%)和无帮助(46人中有31人;67.4%)。大多数患者(196 / 230;85.2%的受访者表示,即使是坏消息,也希望立即公布结果。14.7%)会因为害怕误解而选择不立即释放(34人中有11人;32.4%)或从阅读报告中获得令人不安的信息(34人中有23人;67.6%) .Conclusions。-:门户灵活性选项(即患者选择立即释放部分结果,但不是全部结果),以患者为中心的病理报告,教育材料,临床医生对患者的准备以及量身定制的患者支持是可以帮助更多患者从审查病理报告信息中受益的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信