The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on perceived diabetes care and regulation, with a focus on ethnic minorities: a mixed-methods study.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Saskia E van Grondelle, Bilal Güzel, Manon D Mijnsbergen, Paul Uitewaal, Janet M Kist, Sytske van Bruggen, Hedwig M M Vos, Mattijs E Numans, Rimke C Vos
{"title":"The impact of the covid-19 pandemic on perceived diabetes care and regulation, with a focus on ethnic minorities: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Saskia E van Grondelle, Bilal Güzel, Manon D Mijnsbergen, Paul Uitewaal, Janet M Kist, Sytske van Bruggen, Hedwig M M Vos, Mattijs E Numans, Rimke C Vos","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02691-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting changes to diabetes care, especially concerning disease control, the use of (tele)consultation and lessons worth implementing to improve diabetes care, with a specific focus on ethnic minority groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods prospective cohort study among people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) treated in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was sent regionally, including items related to teleconsultation and amount of contact with the healthcare professional. We conducted interviews based on the chronic care model with individuals from various ethnic backgrounds living in a deprived neighbourhood. Change in diabetes control (HbA1c, fasting glucose, LDL, systolic BP, BMI, eGFR) was evaluated based on routine care data. Latent class analysis was performed to identify groups who were more at risk for decreased glycaemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most people maintained face-to-face (59%) or telephone (44%) contact with their healthcare provider. A decrease in consultations was observed. Based on the interviews, factors important for maintaining good glycaemic control were the use of medical devices, religion, routines and social support from family and friends. We did not find a clinically relevant change in diabetes control and no specific group was identified as at risk for worse diabetes regulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the context of proactive care, remote healthcare and self-regulation have a crucial role for people with T2DM. It is important to identify barriers and facilitators for maintaining good glycaemic control among vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minority groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"25 1","pages":"438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02691-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting changes to diabetes care, especially concerning disease control, the use of (tele)consultation and lessons worth implementing to improve diabetes care, with a specific focus on ethnic minority groups.

Methods: A mixed-methods prospective cohort study among people with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) treated in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic. A survey was sent regionally, including items related to teleconsultation and amount of contact with the healthcare professional. We conducted interviews based on the chronic care model with individuals from various ethnic backgrounds living in a deprived neighbourhood. Change in diabetes control (HbA1c, fasting glucose, LDL, systolic BP, BMI, eGFR) was evaluated based on routine care data. Latent class analysis was performed to identify groups who were more at risk for decreased glycaemic control.

Results: Most people maintained face-to-face (59%) or telephone (44%) contact with their healthcare provider. A decrease in consultations was observed. Based on the interviews, factors important for maintaining good glycaemic control were the use of medical devices, religion, routines and social support from family and friends. We did not find a clinically relevant change in diabetes control and no specific group was identified as at risk for worse diabetes regulation.

Conclusions: In the context of proactive care, remote healthcare and self-regulation have a crucial role for people with T2DM. It is important to identify barriers and facilitators for maintaining good glycaemic control among vulnerable groups, such as ethnic minority groups.

covid-19大流行对感知糖尿病护理和监管的影响,重点是少数民族:一项混合方法研究
背景:本研究旨在探讨COVID-19大流行对糖尿病护理的影响及其变化,特别是在疾病控制、(远程)会诊的使用和值得实施的经验教训方面,以改善糖尿病护理,并特别关注少数民族人群。方法:对COVID-19大流行期间接受初级保健治疗的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者进行一项混合方法前瞻性队列研究。在区域内发送了一份调查,包括与远程咨询和与医疗保健专业人员接触的数量有关的项目。我们对生活在贫困社区的不同种族背景的个体进行了基于慢性护理模型的访谈。根据常规护理数据评估糖尿病控制的变化(HbA1c、空腹血糖、LDL、收缩压、BMI、eGFR)。进行潜在分类分析以确定血糖控制降低风险更高的组。结果:大多数人与医疗保健提供者保持面对面(59%)或电话联系(44%)。观察到协商次数减少。根据访谈,维持良好血糖控制的重要因素是医疗设备的使用、宗教信仰、日常生活和来自家人和朋友的社会支持。我们没有发现糖尿病控制的临床相关变化,也没有特定的组被确定为糖尿病调节更差的风险。结论:在主动护理的背景下,远程医疗和自我调节对T2DM患者起着至关重要的作用。确定弱势群体(如少数民族群体)维持良好血糖控制的障碍和促进因素非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信