Clinical performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing suspected to be extravascular migratory metastases of pancreatic or bile duct cancer (with video).

Kosuke Maehara, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Daiki Agarie, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Yasuhiro Komori, Takehiko Koga, Atsushi Kanno, Tsunao Imamura, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka
{"title":"Clinical performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing suspected to be extravascular migratory metastases of pancreatic or bile duct cancer (with video).","authors":"Kosuke Maehara, Susumu Hijioka, Yoshikuni Nagashio, Yuta Maruki, Daiki Yamashige, Kohei Okamoto, Daiki Agarie, Shin Yagi, Soma Fukuda, Masaru Kuwada, Yasuhiro Komori, Takehiko Koga, Atsushi Kanno, Tsunao Imamura, Yutaka Saito, Takuji Okusaka","doi":"10.1111/den.14983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing (PSTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective study evaluated patients in whom EUS-TA was performed for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer lesions between October 2017 and March 2024. PSTC was defined as a perivascular soft-tissue area contiguous with nearby blood vessels from the suspected primary tumor. EUS-TA procedures and outcomes, including technical success, diagnostic performance, adverse events, and comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1803 patients, 53 underwent EUS-TA for PSTC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92.1%, 100%, and 92.5%, respectively. The technical success rate was 98.1% (52/53). The adverse event rate was 1.9%. EUS-TA for PSTC was significantly superior to CECT for PSTC in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance and adverse event rates for EUS-TA for PSTC were comparable to those for TA in solid tumors. Shorter puncture lengths were associated with lower accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS-TA for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and a low rate of adverse events, showing superior diagnostic performance compared to CECT. These findings suggest that EUS-TA for PSTC can be performed safely and is a clinically beneficial procedure. Despite the technical challenges, EUS-TA for PSTC can influence clinical judgment and should be considered in skilled institutions for future patient treatment decisions. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate its efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for perivascular soft-tissue cuffing (PSTC).

Methods: This single-center, retrospective study evaluated patients in whom EUS-TA was performed for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer lesions between October 2017 and March 2024. PSTC was defined as a perivascular soft-tissue area contiguous with nearby blood vessels from the suspected primary tumor. EUS-TA procedures and outcomes, including technical success, diagnostic performance, adverse events, and comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), were analyzed.

Results: Of 1803 patients, 53 underwent EUS-TA for PSTC. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 92.1%, 100%, and 92.5%, respectively. The technical success rate was 98.1% (52/53). The adverse event rate was 1.9%. EUS-TA for PSTC was significantly superior to CECT for PSTC in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, the diagnostic performance and adverse event rates for EUS-TA for PSTC were comparable to those for TA in solid tumors. Shorter puncture lengths were associated with lower accuracy.

Conclusion: EUS-TA for PSTC in pancreatic or bile duct cancer demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and a low rate of adverse events, showing superior diagnostic performance compared to CECT. These findings suggest that EUS-TA for PSTC can be performed safely and is a clinically beneficial procedure. Despite the technical challenges, EUS-TA for PSTC can influence clinical judgment and should be considered in skilled institutions for future patient treatment decisions. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate its efficacy and safety.

超声内镜引导下组织采集对疑似胰腺或胆管癌血管外迁移转移的血管周围软组织割伤的临床表现(附视频)。
目的:本研究旨在探讨超声内镜引导下组织采集(EUS-TA)对血管周围软组织结扎(PSTC)的诊断性能和安全性。方法:这项单中心、回顾性研究评估了2017年10月至2024年3月期间在胰腺或胆管癌病变中行EUS-TA行PSTC的患者。PSTC被定义为与疑似原发肿瘤附近血管相邻的血管周围软组织区域。分析EUS-TA程序和结果,包括技术成功、诊断表现、不良事件以及与对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)的比较。结果:1803例患者中,53例行EUS-TA诊断PSTC。灵敏度为92.1%,特异度为100%,准确度为92.5%。技术成功率为98.1%(52/53)。不良事件发生率为1.9%。EUS-TA对PSTC的诊断准确性明显优于CECT。此外,EUS-TA对PSTC的诊断性能和不良事件发生率与TA对实体瘤的诊断性能和不良事件发生率相当。较短的穿刺长度与较低的准确性相关。结论:EUS-TA对胰腺或胆管癌PSTC的诊断准确率高,不良事件发生率低,诊断效果优于CECT。这些发现表明EUS-TA用于PSTC是安全的,是一种临床有益的手术。尽管存在技术上的挑战,但EUS-TA对PSTC的诊断可能会影响临床判断,在技术成熟的机构中,应该考虑采用EUS-TA对未来患者的治疗决策。有必要进行前瞻性多中心研究,进一步评估其有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信