Multi-Mode Face-to-Face and Telephone Approach to Data Collection in Health Surveys: A Scoping Review.

Paulo Henrique Guerra, Letícia Aparecida Calderão Sposito, Daniel Umpierre, Alex Antonio Florindo
{"title":"Multi-Mode Face-to-Face and Telephone Approach to Data Collection in Health Surveys: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Paulo Henrique Guerra, Letícia Aparecida Calderão Sposito, Daniel Umpierre, Alex Antonio Florindo","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia5040054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The present study aims to identify information from health research studies that have used a mixed-methods data collection approach, considering the combination of face-to-face and telephone interviews (referred to as the MMFT approach), specifically focusing on identifying themes, objectives, designs, populations involved, and implementation processes. <b>Methods</b>: A scoping review was developed, with systematic searches performed in March 2024 across five databases, namely, PubMed; SciELO; Scopus; Web of Science; as well as Google Scholar and reference lists. The inclusion criteria were defined under the following categories: \"Participants\" (observational epidemiological studies, with no restrictions as to where they were carried out, sampling techniques, or sample profiles); \"Concept\" (use of MMFT in data collection), and \"Context\" (studies carried out in the health area, with no restrictions on the theme/subject). The review process was carried out by three researchers who worked independently. <b>Results</b>: From the initial 1515 potential references, the synthesis of this review included data from seven original studies, highlighting cross-sectional designs, involvement of adults and/or elderly people without specific health conditions, variability between data collection strategies, and complementary use of online approaches. <b>Conclusions</b>: Based on the evidence generated, it is recommended that future studies assess aspects of the MMFT approach in terms of response rate, cost reduction, and increasing the speed of conducting health surveys.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"5 4","pages":"796-804"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11675162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia5040054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The present study aims to identify information from health research studies that have used a mixed-methods data collection approach, considering the combination of face-to-face and telephone interviews (referred to as the MMFT approach), specifically focusing on identifying themes, objectives, designs, populations involved, and implementation processes. Methods: A scoping review was developed, with systematic searches performed in March 2024 across five databases, namely, PubMed; SciELO; Scopus; Web of Science; as well as Google Scholar and reference lists. The inclusion criteria were defined under the following categories: "Participants" (observational epidemiological studies, with no restrictions as to where they were carried out, sampling techniques, or sample profiles); "Concept" (use of MMFT in data collection), and "Context" (studies carried out in the health area, with no restrictions on the theme/subject). The review process was carried out by three researchers who worked independently. Results: From the initial 1515 potential references, the synthesis of this review included data from seven original studies, highlighting cross-sectional designs, involvement of adults and/or elderly people without specific health conditions, variability between data collection strategies, and complementary use of online approaches. Conclusions: Based on the evidence generated, it is recommended that future studies assess aspects of the MMFT approach in terms of response rate, cost reduction, and increasing the speed of conducting health surveys.

健康调查数据收集的多模式面对面和电话方法:范围审查。
背景/目的:本研究旨在确定使用混合方法数据收集方法的健康研究的信息,考虑到面对面和电话访谈的结合(称为MMFT方法),特别侧重于确定主题、目标、设计、所涉及的人群和实施过程。方法:制定了范围综述,并于2024年3月在五个数据库中进行了系统检索,即PubMed;收录了;斯高帕斯;Web of Science;以及谷歌学者和参考书目。纳入标准按以下类别定义:“参与者”(观察性流行病学研究,在进行地点、抽样技术或样本概况方面没有限制);“概念”(在数据收集中使用MMFT)和“背景”(在卫生领域进行的研究,对主题/主题没有限制)。审查过程由三名独立工作的研究人员进行。结果:从最初的1515个潜在参考文献中,本综述的综合包括来自7个原始研究的数据,突出了横断面设计,涉及没有特定健康状况的成年人和/或老年人,数据收集策略之间的可变性,以及在线方法的补充使用。结论:根据所产生的证据,建议未来的研究在响应率、降低成本和提高开展健康调查的速度方面评估MMFT方法的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信