Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting venous thromboembolism in colorectal cancer patients: A cohort study in China

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Zuhai Hu , Xiaosheng Li , Yuliang Yuan , Qianjie Xu , Wei Zhang , Haike Lei
{"title":"Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting venous thromboembolism in colorectal cancer patients: A cohort study in China","authors":"Zuhai Hu ,&nbsp;Xiaosheng Li ,&nbsp;Yuliang Yuan ,&nbsp;Qianjie Xu ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Haike Lei","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With advancements in healthcare, traditional VTE risk assessment tools are increasingly insufficient to meet the demands of high-quality care, underscoring the need for innovative and specialized assessment methods.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Owing to the remarkable success of machine learning in supervised learning and disease prediction, our objective is to develop a reliable and efficient model for assessing VTE risk by leveraging the fundamental data and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients within our medical facility.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six commonly used machine learning algorithms were utilized in our study to predict the occurrence of VTE in patients with rectal cancer. In the modeling process, LASSO regression was employed to identify and exclude variables not associated with VTE. Additionally, hyperparameter tuning was conducted via 5-fold cross-validation to mitigate overfitting, and 200 bootstrap samples were used to adjust the apparent performance on the training set. The selection of the VTE assessment model was determined by a thorough evaluation of performance criteria, such as the AUC, ACC and F1 score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The RF model exhibits consistent and efficient performance. Specifically, in the internally validation dataset, where generalizability was adjusted, the RF model achieved the highest scores across multiple metrics: AD-AUC (0.895), AD-ACC (0.871), AD-F1 (0.311), AD-MCC (0.316), AD-Precision (0.241), AD-Specificity (0.888). For external validation on unseen colon cancer data, the RF model also performed best in terms of ACC (0.728), F1 (0.292), MCC (0.225), Precision (0.192), and Specificity (0.740), with a suboptimal AUC of 0.745 and a Sensitivity (Recall) of 0.615. Additionally, the RF model demonstrates strong performance not only on the original dataset but also on datasets processed via alternative imbalance handling techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our research successfully established and validated a risk assessment model for assessing the risk of VTE in colorectal cancer patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 105770"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624004337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

With advancements in healthcare, traditional VTE risk assessment tools are increasingly insufficient to meet the demands of high-quality care, underscoring the need for innovative and specialized assessment methods.

Objective

Owing to the remarkable success of machine learning in supervised learning and disease prediction, our objective is to develop a reliable and efficient model for assessing VTE risk by leveraging the fundamental data and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer patients within our medical facility.

Methods

Six commonly used machine learning algorithms were utilized in our study to predict the occurrence of VTE in patients with rectal cancer. In the modeling process, LASSO regression was employed to identify and exclude variables not associated with VTE. Additionally, hyperparameter tuning was conducted via 5-fold cross-validation to mitigate overfitting, and 200 bootstrap samples were used to adjust the apparent performance on the training set. The selection of the VTE assessment model was determined by a thorough evaluation of performance criteria, such as the AUC, ACC and F1 score.

Results

The RF model exhibits consistent and efficient performance. Specifically, in the internally validation dataset, where generalizability was adjusted, the RF model achieved the highest scores across multiple metrics: AD-AUC (0.895), AD-ACC (0.871), AD-F1 (0.311), AD-MCC (0.316), AD-Precision (0.241), AD-Specificity (0.888). For external validation on unseen colon cancer data, the RF model also performed best in terms of ACC (0.728), F1 (0.292), MCC (0.225), Precision (0.192), and Specificity (0.740), with a suboptimal AUC of 0.745 and a Sensitivity (Recall) of 0.615. Additionally, the RF model demonstrates strong performance not only on the original dataset but also on datasets processed via alternative imbalance handling techniques.

Conclusions

Our research successfully established and validated a risk assessment model for assessing the risk of VTE in colorectal cancer patients.
预测结直肠癌患者静脉血栓栓塞的机器学习模型的开发和验证:中国的一项队列研究。
背景:随着医疗技术的进步,传统的静脉血栓栓塞风险评估工具越来越不能满足高质量医疗的需求,需要创新和专业化的评估方法。由于机器学习在监督学习和疾病预测方面取得了显著成功,我们的目标是利用我们医疗机构内结直肠癌患者的基础数据和临床特征,开发一种可靠有效的静脉血栓栓塞风险评估模型。方法:采用6种常用的机器学习算法预测直肠癌患者静脉血栓栓塞的发生。在建模过程中,采用LASSO回归来识别和排除与VTE无关的变量。此外,通过5倍交叉验证进行超参数调整以减轻过拟合,并使用200个bootstrap样本来调整训练集上的表观性能。VTE评估模型的选择是通过对AUC、ACC和F1评分等性能标准的全面评估来确定的。结果:射频模型具有一致性和有效性。具体来说,在内部验证数据集中,调整了可泛化性,RF模型在多个指标上取得了最高分:AD-AUC (0.895), AD-ACC (0.871), AD-F1 (0.311), AD-MCC (0.316), AD-Precision (0.241), AD-Specificity(0.888)。对于未见过的结肠癌数据的外部验证,RF模型在ACC(0.728)、F1(0.292)、MCC(0.225)、Precision(0.192)和Specificity(0.740)方面也表现最好,其次优AUC为0.745,灵敏度(召回率)为0.615。此外,RF模型不仅在原始数据集上表现出色,而且在通过替代不平衡处理技术处理的数据集上也表现出色。结论:本研究成功建立并验证了评估结直肠癌患者静脉血栓栓塞风险的风险评估模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信