Huddles in Hospital Maternity Settings: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Samantha L Bernstein, Jessica G Bell, Rebecca Broadhurst
{"title":"Huddles in Hospital Maternity Settings: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Samantha L Bernstein, Jessica G Bell, Rebecca Broadhurst","doi":"10.1097/NMC.0000000000001077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommends the use of safety huddles, in which clinicians are briefly gathered to review a patient's condition, including new or developing changes in acuity or stability. The Joint Commission describes huddles as a \"hallmark\" of high-reliability organizations. Previous reviews have confirmed the general utility of huddles, including positive regard by clinicians, but there has not been work specifically looking at huddle use in hospital maternity care settings. Our objective was to identify the ways that huddles have been studied or reported in inpatient maternity settings and synthesize this information with recommendations from professional organizations to identify gaps in the literature published in the United States since 1999.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework to guide our scoping review. Using the time frame from 1999 to 2024, we searched the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Embase, as well as gray literature and the reference lists and citing articles of the included manuscripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found 160 documents, of which 47 met inclusion criteria, including 11 care bundles, 10 quality improvement projects, and 4 research studies. The remaining 22 were a variety of editorials, position papers, and other gray literature.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is scant research on the use of huddles in hospital maternity care settings, and most literature does not define the participants, timing, or agenda of the huddle. Further research is needed to understand how huddles affect outcomes in maternity settings. Researchers should explicitly define the huddles they are studying. The review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework Registries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51121,"journal":{"name":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mcn-The American Journal of Maternal-Child Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NMC.0000000000001077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality recommends the use of safety huddles, in which clinicians are briefly gathered to review a patient's condition, including new or developing changes in acuity or stability. The Joint Commission describes huddles as a "hallmark" of high-reliability organizations. Previous reviews have confirmed the general utility of huddles, including positive regard by clinicians, but there has not been work specifically looking at huddle use in hospital maternity care settings. Our objective was to identify the ways that huddles have been studied or reported in inpatient maternity settings and synthesize this information with recommendations from professional organizations to identify gaps in the literature published in the United States since 1999.

Methods: We used Arksey and O'Malley's framework to guide our scoping review. Using the time frame from 1999 to 2024, we searched the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Embase, as well as gray literature and the reference lists and citing articles of the included manuscripts.

Results: We found 160 documents, of which 47 met inclusion criteria, including 11 care bundles, 10 quality improvement projects, and 4 research studies. The remaining 22 were a variety of editorials, position papers, and other gray literature.

Discussion: There is scant research on the use of huddles in hospital maternity care settings, and most literature does not define the participants, timing, or agenda of the huddle. Further research is needed to understand how huddles affect outcomes in maternity settings. Researchers should explicitly define the huddles they are studying. The review protocol was registered at Open Science Framework Registries.

医院产科环境中的会议:范围审查。
背景:卫生保健研究和质量机构建议使用安全会议,其中临床医生简短地聚集在一起,审查患者的状况,包括新的或发展中的变化在敏锐度或稳定性。联合委员会将秘密会议描述为高可靠性组织的“标志”。以前的评论已经证实了小组会议的一般效用,包括临床医生的积极评价,但还没有专门研究小组会议在医院产科护理环境中的使用。我们的目标是确定在住院产科环境中研究或报告的蜷缩方式,并将这些信息与专业组织的建议综合起来,以确定自1999年以来在美国发表的文献中的差距。方法:我们使用Arksey和O'Malley的框架来指导我们的范围审查。检索时间为1999 - 2024年,检索了PubMed、CINAHL、SCOPUS、Embase等数据库,检索了灰色文献和收录稿件的参考文献列表及引用文章。结果:我们共找到160篇文献,其中47篇符合纳入标准,包括11个护理包、10个质量改善项目和4个研究。剩下的22篇是各种各样的社论、立场文件和其他灰色文献。讨论:关于在医院产科护理环境中使用会议的研究很少,大多数文献没有定义会议的参与者、时间或议程。需要进一步的研究来了解挤在一起如何影响孕妇的分娩结果。研究人员应该明确定义他们正在研究的分组。该审查方案已在开放科学框架登记处注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MCN''s mission is to provide the most timely, relevant information to nurses practicing in perinatal, neonatal, midwifery, and pediatric specialties. MCN is a peer-reviewed journal that meets its mission by publishing clinically relevant practice and research manuscripts aimed at assisting nurses toward evidence-based practice. MCN focuses on today''s major issues and high priority problems in maternal/child nursing, women''s health, and family nursing with extensive coverage of advanced practice healthcare issues relating to infants and young children. Each issue features peer-reviewed, clinically relevant articles. Coverage includes updates on disease and related care; ideas on health promotion; insights into patient and family behavior; discoveries in physiology and pathophysiology; clinical investigations; and research manuscripts that assist nurses toward evidence-based practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信