Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prior Authorizations for Orthopaedic Care Are Negatively Affected by Medicaid Insurance Status.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Samantha Harrer, Kathryn Hedden, Sadegh Mikaeili, Nazila Bazrafshan, Pietro M Gentile, David B Gealt, Matthew L Brown
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prior Authorizations for Orthopaedic Care Are Negatively Affected by Medicaid Insurance Status.","authors":"Samantha Harrer, Kathryn Hedden, Sadegh Mikaeili, Nazila Bazrafshan, Pietro M Gentile, David B Gealt, Matthew L Brown","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized musculoskeletal care. However, its high costs and high utilization has prompted many insurance payors to require a prior authorization. This process remains burdensome and results in delays to patient care. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between several variables and the denial rate of outpatient MRI prior authorization requests from a single institution's department of orthopaedics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRI prior authorization insurance data was retrospectively collected from January 2019 to December 2022. Patient demographics, imaging characteristics, and insurance details were extracted and stratified into generalized categories. Analysis of variance, multivariate logistic regression models, and odds ratios (ORs) were used to predict the likelihood of request denial with α = 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 17,913 total MRI prior authorization requests identified, 885 (4.94%) were denied. Race and socioeconomic status were not markedly different between the authorized and denied cohorts; however, primary insurance payor, chief symptom, and anatomic location to be imaged were found to have notable differences between authorized and denied cohorts ( P < 0.0001). MRIs of the spine were less likely to be authorized compared with the shoulder (OR 0.51), upper extremity (OR 0.43), knee (OR 0.38), lower extremity (OR 0.34), and foot and ankle (OR 0.75) with P < 0.02 for each. Horizon NJ Health and Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield, both Medicaid payors, were also less likely to authorize requests compared with other payors (Aetna, OR 0.37 and United Healthcare, OR 0.36) ( P < 0.01 for both).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The low denial rate of initial prior authorization requests over 4 years at our institution underscores the questionable utility of the prior authorization process. Our results are consistent with the current literature that has reported higher rates of denials for MRI prior authorization requests of the spine. Although we were not able to quantify the effect of these denials on patient care, the overall time required to process these requests undoubtedly causes delays in patient care. despite no notable difference seen in socioeconomic status, Horizon NJ Health, a major provider of only Medicaid insurance plans at our institution, was associated with a higher likelihood of denial. This suggests that MRI prior authorization requests submitted for Medicaid patients are more likely to be denied and cause an inequitable delay in care due to this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e244-e252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized musculoskeletal care. However, its high costs and high utilization has prompted many insurance payors to require a prior authorization. This process remains burdensome and results in delays to patient care. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between several variables and the denial rate of outpatient MRI prior authorization requests from a single institution's department of orthopaedics.

Methods: MRI prior authorization insurance data was retrospectively collected from January 2019 to December 2022. Patient demographics, imaging characteristics, and insurance details were extracted and stratified into generalized categories. Analysis of variance, multivariate logistic regression models, and odds ratios (ORs) were used to predict the likelihood of request denial with α = 0.05.

Results: Of the 17,913 total MRI prior authorization requests identified, 885 (4.94%) were denied. Race and socioeconomic status were not markedly different between the authorized and denied cohorts; however, primary insurance payor, chief symptom, and anatomic location to be imaged were found to have notable differences between authorized and denied cohorts ( P < 0.0001). MRIs of the spine were less likely to be authorized compared with the shoulder (OR 0.51), upper extremity (OR 0.43), knee (OR 0.38), lower extremity (OR 0.34), and foot and ankle (OR 0.75) with P < 0.02 for each. Horizon NJ Health and Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield, both Medicaid payors, were also less likely to authorize requests compared with other payors (Aetna, OR 0.37 and United Healthcare, OR 0.36) ( P < 0.01 for both).

Conclusion: The low denial rate of initial prior authorization requests over 4 years at our institution underscores the questionable utility of the prior authorization process. Our results are consistent with the current literature that has reported higher rates of denials for MRI prior authorization requests of the spine. Although we were not able to quantify the effect of these denials on patient care, the overall time required to process these requests undoubtedly causes delays in patient care. despite no notable difference seen in socioeconomic status, Horizon NJ Health, a major provider of only Medicaid insurance plans at our institution, was associated with a higher likelihood of denial. This suggests that MRI prior authorization requests submitted for Medicaid patients are more likely to be denied and cause an inequitable delay in care due to this process.

磁共振成像骨科护理的先前授权受到医疗补助保险状态的负面影响。
背景:磁共振成像(MRI)已经彻底改变了肌肉骨骼护理。然而,它的高成本和高使用率促使许多保险支付方要求事先授权。这一过程仍然是繁重的,并导致病人护理的延误。本研究的目的是研究几个变量与单个机构骨科门诊MRI预先授权请求的拒绝率之间的关系。方法:回顾性收集2019年1月至2022年12月MRI事先授权保险数据。提取患者人口统计学、影像学特征和保险细节,并将其分层为一般类别。采用方差分析、多元logistic回归模型和比值比(ORs)预测拒绝请求的可能性,α = 0.05。结果:在17,913个MRI预先授权请求中,885个(4.94%)被拒绝。种族和社会经济地位在批准和拒绝的队列之间没有显着差异;然而,主要保险付款人、主要症状和影像学解剖位置在授权和拒绝队列之间存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)。与肩部(OR 0.51)、上肢(OR 0.43)、膝关节(OR 0.38)、下肢(OR 0.34)、足部和踝关节(OR 0.75)相比,脊柱的mri更不可能获得批准,P < 0.02。与其他支付方(Aetna, OR 0.37和United Healthcare, OR 0.36)相比,医疗补助支付方Horizon NJ Health和Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield也不太可能批准请求(两者的P < 0.01)。结论:我们机构4年来首次事先授权请求的低拒取率凸显了事先授权程序的实用性问题。我们的结果与当前文献报道的脊柱MRI预先授权请求的拒绝率较高一致。虽然我们无法量化这些拒绝对患者护理的影响,但处理这些请求所需的总时间无疑会导致患者护理的延误。尽管在社会经济地位上没有明显的差异,但地平线新泽西健康公司(Horizon NJ Health)——我们机构唯一的医疗补助保险计划的主要提供者——与更高的拒绝可能性相关。这表明,为医疗补助患者提交的MRI事先授权请求更有可能被拒绝,并由于这一过程而导致不公平的护理延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信