Functional Septorhinoplasty in Unilateral and Bilateral Nasal Obstruction: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Nicholas R Randall, Dane M Barrett, Dennis O Frank-Ito, Keven Seung Yong Ji, Thien Hoang, Tom D Wang, Myriam Loyo
{"title":"Functional Septorhinoplasty in Unilateral and Bilateral Nasal Obstruction: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Nicholas R Randall, Dane M Barrett, Dennis O Frank-Ito, Keven Seung Yong Ji, Thien Hoang, Tom D Wang, Myriam Loyo","doi":"10.1177/00034894241309751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Functional septorhinoplasty is an effective treatment for nasal airway obstruction. Little distinction exists between bilaterally and unilaterally obstructed patients in literature. Our study evaluates outcomes in patients with unilateral nasal airway obstruction compared to those with bilateral nasal airway obstruction as measured by nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scores following functional septorhinoplasty.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 227 patients underwent functional septorhinoplasty for nasal airway obstruction. Patients were grouped into unilateral (n = 64) and bilateral (n = 163) nasal obstruction cohorts based on patient report and physician assessment. Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scores were obtained pre-operatively and post-operatively at least 3 months following surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with unilateral nasal obstruction had slightly less severe symptoms preoperatively than patients with bilateral obstruction. Average preoperative NOSE scores for patients with unilateral obstruction was 64 (SD = 19) and 72 (SD = 18) for patients with bilateral obstruction (<i>P</i> = .004). Postoperative NOSE scores following septorhinoplasty were significantly reduced for patients with both unilateral and bilateral nasal obstruction (postoperative NOSE scores unilateral: 17, SD = 16 ; bilateral: 23, SD = 21). There was no statistical significance in outcomes between patients with unilateral or bilateral nasal obstruction groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Symptoms in patients with unilateral obstruction are similar but slightly less severe than patients with bilateral obstruction. Patients with unilateral and bilateral nasal obstruction experienced a similar degree of improvement in symptom following functional septorhinoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894241309751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241309751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Functional septorhinoplasty is an effective treatment for nasal airway obstruction. Little distinction exists between bilaterally and unilaterally obstructed patients in literature. Our study evaluates outcomes in patients with unilateral nasal airway obstruction compared to those with bilateral nasal airway obstruction as measured by nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scores following functional septorhinoplasty.

Materials and methods: A total of 227 patients underwent functional septorhinoplasty for nasal airway obstruction. Patients were grouped into unilateral (n = 64) and bilateral (n = 163) nasal obstruction cohorts based on patient report and physician assessment. Nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scores were obtained pre-operatively and post-operatively at least 3 months following surgery.

Results: Patients with unilateral nasal obstruction had slightly less severe symptoms preoperatively than patients with bilateral obstruction. Average preoperative NOSE scores for patients with unilateral obstruction was 64 (SD = 19) and 72 (SD = 18) for patients with bilateral obstruction (P = .004). Postoperative NOSE scores following septorhinoplasty were significantly reduced for patients with both unilateral and bilateral nasal obstruction (postoperative NOSE scores unilateral: 17, SD = 16 ; bilateral: 23, SD = 21). There was no statistical significance in outcomes between patients with unilateral or bilateral nasal obstruction groups.

Conclusions: Symptoms in patients with unilateral obstruction are similar but slightly less severe than patients with bilateral obstruction. Patients with unilateral and bilateral nasal obstruction experienced a similar degree of improvement in symptom following functional septorhinoplasty.

单侧和双侧鼻塞的功能性鼻中隔成形术:患者报告结果的比较。
目的:功能性鼻中隔成形术是治疗鼻气道阻塞的有效方法。文献中对双侧梗阻和单侧梗阻患者的区分很少。我们的研究通过功能性鼻中隔成形术后鼻塞症状评估评分来评估单侧鼻气道阻塞患者与双侧鼻气道阻塞患者的预后。材料与方法:对227例鼻道阻塞患者行功能性鼻中隔成形术。根据患者报告和医生评估,将患者分为单侧(n = 64)和双侧(n = 163)鼻塞组。术前和术后至少3个月分别进行鼻塞症状评估(NOSE)评分。结果:单侧鼻塞患者术前症状轻于双侧鼻塞患者。单侧梗阻患者术前平均NOSE评分为64分(SD = 19),双侧梗阻患者术前平均NOSE评分为72分(SD = 18) (P = 0.004)。单侧和双侧鼻塞患者鼻中隔成形术后鼻翼评分显著降低(单侧鼻翼术后鼻翼评分:17,SD = 16;双侧:23,SD = 21)。单侧鼻塞组与双侧鼻塞组的预后差异无统计学意义。结论:单侧梗阻患者的症状与双侧梗阻相似,但严重程度略轻。单侧和双侧鼻塞患者在功能性鼻中隔成形术后症状改善程度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信