Ictal semiology in temporo-frontal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Irina Oane, Andrei Barborica, Ioana Mîndruţă
{"title":"Ictal semiology in temporo-frontal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Irina Oane, Andrei Barborica, Ioana Mîndruţă","doi":"10.1002/epd2.20328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We performed a systematic review of the ictal semiology of temporo-frontal seizures with the aim to summarize the state-of-the-art anatomo-clinical correlations in the field, and help guide the interpretation of ictal semiology within the framework of presurgical evaluation. We conducted the systematic review and meta-analysis, and reported its results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. We searched electronic databases (Scopus, PUBMED, Web of Science, and EMBASE) using relevant keywords related to temporal, frontal and sublobar structures, semiology, and electroencephalography/stereoelectroencephalography exploration. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS2. We included articles in English, reporting the seizure semiology of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with temporal-frontal involvement and patients with frontal lobe epilepsy and fronto-temporal network involved. We performed hierarchical cluster analysis to determine signs and symptoms associated with the temporo-frontal epileptogenic network for all patients and for each subgroup (frontal/temporal seizure onset). Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate the difference in seizure freedom and clinical sign/symptom occurrence in patients that underwent unilobar versus bilobar resection. Meta-analysis on the prevalence of temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal involvement applying a random-effect model was used. We included 40 articles and we extracted data from 109 patients. The meta-analysis showed the total prevalence of temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal network involvement was 19.75%, CI 12.02-27.47, high heterogeneity (82.71%). For the whole group and subgroups, the main cluster of clinical manifestations is emotional, autonomic, cognitive, grimace, hyperkinetic (association coefficient higher than .6). Elementary motor semiology is significantly associated with multilobar resection (p = .022 whole group and p = .0012 fronto-temporal subgroup). Fifty-eight patients were seizure-free after surgery. There was no significant difference between seizure freedom in uni versus bilobar resections (p = .28). Seizures involving temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal network usually manifest with a cluster of signs and symptoms: emotional, autonomic, grimace, cognitive and hyperkinetic behavior. Based on semiology, one cannot distinguish between fronto-temporal and temporo-frontal cases at individual patient level. In those patients undergoing a surgical procedure, elementary motor seizure semiology is significantly associated with multilobar resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":50508,"journal":{"name":"Epileptic Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epileptic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epd2.20328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We performed a systematic review of the ictal semiology of temporo-frontal seizures with the aim to summarize the state-of-the-art anatomo-clinical correlations in the field, and help guide the interpretation of ictal semiology within the framework of presurgical evaluation. We conducted the systematic review and meta-analysis, and reported its results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. We searched electronic databases (Scopus, PUBMED, Web of Science, and EMBASE) using relevant keywords related to temporal, frontal and sublobar structures, semiology, and electroencephalography/stereoelectroencephalography exploration. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS2. We included articles in English, reporting the seizure semiology of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy with temporal-frontal involvement and patients with frontal lobe epilepsy and fronto-temporal network involved. We performed hierarchical cluster analysis to determine signs and symptoms associated with the temporo-frontal epileptogenic network for all patients and for each subgroup (frontal/temporal seizure onset). Fisher exact test was performed to evaluate the difference in seizure freedom and clinical sign/symptom occurrence in patients that underwent unilobar versus bilobar resection. Meta-analysis on the prevalence of temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal involvement applying a random-effect model was used. We included 40 articles and we extracted data from 109 patients. The meta-analysis showed the total prevalence of temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal network involvement was 19.75%, CI 12.02-27.47, high heterogeneity (82.71%). For the whole group and subgroups, the main cluster of clinical manifestations is emotional, autonomic, cognitive, grimace, hyperkinetic (association coefficient higher than .6). Elementary motor semiology is significantly associated with multilobar resection (p = .022 whole group and p = .0012 fronto-temporal subgroup). Fifty-eight patients were seizure-free after surgery. There was no significant difference between seizure freedom in uni versus bilobar resections (p = .28). Seizures involving temporo-frontal/fronto-temporal network usually manifest with a cluster of signs and symptoms: emotional, autonomic, grimace, cognitive and hyperkinetic behavior. Based on semiology, one cannot distinguish between fronto-temporal and temporo-frontal cases at individual patient level. In those patients undergoing a surgical procedure, elementary motor seizure semiology is significantly associated with multilobar resection.

颞额癫痫的临界符号学:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
我们系统回顾了颞额叶癫痫发作的前兆符号学,旨在总结该领域最新的解剖学与临床相关性,并帮助指导术前评估框架内前兆符号学的解释。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,并根据系统评价和荟萃分析声明的首选报告项目报告其结果。我们检索了电子数据库(Scopus、PUBMED、Web of Science和EMBASE),使用了与颞叶、额叶和叶下结构、符会学和脑电图/立体脑电图探索相关的关键词。使用QUADAS2评估偏倚风险。我们纳入了英文文章,报道了颞额受累的颞叶癫痫患者和额颞网络受累的额叶癫痫患者的癫痫符号学。我们对所有患者和每个亚组(额叶/颞叶癫痫发作)进行了分层聚类分析,以确定与颞额叶癫痫发作网络相关的体征和症状。采用Fisher精确检验来评估单叶切除与双叶切除患者癫痫发作自由度和临床体征/症状发生的差异。采用随机效应模型对颞额/额颞受累发生率进行meta分析。我们纳入了40篇文章,并从109名患者中提取了数据。meta分析显示,颞额/额颞网络受累的总患病率为19.75%,CI 12.02-27.47,异质性高(82.71%)。全组和亚组临床表现以情绪、自主、认知、鬼脸、多动为主(相关系数大于0.6)。初级运动符号学与多叶切除显著相关(p =。022整组p =。0012额颞亚组)。58例患者术后无癫痫发作。单叶切除与双叶切除的癫痫发作自由无显著差异(p = 0.28)。涉及颞额/额颞网络的癫痫发作通常表现为一系列体征和症状:情绪、自主、鬼脸、认知和多动行为。基于符号学,人们不能区分个体患者水平的额颞和颞额病例。在接受外科手术的患者中,初级运动癫痫符号学与多叶切除有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epileptic Disorders
Epileptic Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epileptic Disorders is the leading forum where all experts and medical studentswho wish to improve their understanding of epilepsy and related disorders can share practical experiences surrounding diagnosis and care, natural history, and management of seizures. Epileptic Disorders is the official E-journal of the International League Against Epilepsy for educational communication. As the journal celebrates its 20th anniversary, it will now be available only as an online version. Its mission is to create educational links between epileptologists and other health professionals in clinical practice and scientists or physicians in research-based institutions. This change is accompanied by an increase in the number of issues per year, from 4 to 6, to ensure regular diffusion of recently published material (high quality Review and Seminar in Epileptology papers; Original Research articles or Case reports of educational value; MultiMedia Teaching Material), to serve the global medical community that cares for those affected by epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信