Disparities in telehealth utilization between US rural and urban areas during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Redwan Bin Abdul Baten PhD, Fatema Tuz Zohora BDS, Muhammad Umar Hasan Siddiqui MBBS
{"title":"Disparities in telehealth utilization between US rural and urban areas during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Redwan Bin Abdul Baten PhD,&nbsp;Fatema Tuz Zohora BDS,&nbsp;Muhammad Umar Hasan Siddiqui MBBS","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth services were expanded across the United States to meet the increased demand and safety requirements of care. This observational study aims to understand rural-urban differences in telehealth utilization during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Individual-level data from the National Health Interview Survey 2020-2021 (age ≥18) were analyzed for this study. The Propensity Score Matching method with multivariable Ordinary Least Square was used to analyze 2 outcome variables—(1) having a medical appointment by video or phone in the past 12 months and (2) having a virtual one for reasons related to the pandemic. Event study models were analyzed to understand the trend of telehealth utilization throughout 6 quarters of the pandemic. Subgroup analysis by health insurance, age, sex, race, citizenship, and disability status was performed to identify underlying disparities between rural and urban residents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Analysis reveals that rural respondents (N = 6,984) were 8.7 percentage points (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) less likely than urban respondents (N = 40,207) to have a medical appointment by video or phone. Rural residents were 8.1 percentage points (<i>P</i>&lt;.001) less likely to have had a virtual medical appointment because of reasons related to the COVID-19 pandemic than urban users. The event study showed that rural-urban telehealth utilization disparities persisted throughout the pandemic. Subgroup analysis revealed significant rural-urban disparities in telehealth utilization by demographic characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results demonstrate that rural residents were less likely than urban residents to utilize telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting concerns about access to care for rural residents.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth services were expanded across the United States to meet the increased demand and safety requirements of care. This observational study aims to understand rural-urban differences in telehealth utilization during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Individual-level data from the National Health Interview Survey 2020-2021 (age ≥18) were analyzed for this study. The Propensity Score Matching method with multivariable Ordinary Least Square was used to analyze 2 outcome variables—(1) having a medical appointment by video or phone in the past 12 months and (2) having a virtual one for reasons related to the pandemic. Event study models were analyzed to understand the trend of telehealth utilization throughout 6 quarters of the pandemic. Subgroup analysis by health insurance, age, sex, race, citizenship, and disability status was performed to identify underlying disparities between rural and urban residents.

Findings

Analysis reveals that rural respondents (N = 6,984) were 8.7 percentage points (P<.001) less likely than urban respondents (N = 40,207) to have a medical appointment by video or phone. Rural residents were 8.1 percentage points (P<.001) less likely to have had a virtual medical appointment because of reasons related to the COVID-19 pandemic than urban users. The event study showed that rural-urban telehealth utilization disparities persisted throughout the pandemic. Subgroup analysis revealed significant rural-urban disparities in telehealth utilization by demographic characteristics.

Conclusions

Results demonstrate that rural residents were less likely than urban residents to utilize telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting concerns about access to care for rural residents.

COVID-19大流行期间美国农村和城市地区远程医疗利用的差异
目的:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,远程医疗服务在美国各地得到扩展,以满足日益增长的医疗需求和安全要求。本观察性研究旨在了解COVID-19大流行早期农村和城市在远程医疗利用方面的差异。方法:本研究分析来自2020-2021年全国健康访谈调查(年龄≥18岁)的个人数据。采用多变量普通最小二乘法的倾向得分匹配法,分析了过去12个月内通过视频或电话进行医疗预约和由于与大流行有关的原因进行虚拟预约的2个结果变量。对事件研究模型进行了分析,以了解大流行期间6个季度远程医疗利用的趋势。按健康保险、年龄、性别、种族、国籍和残疾状况进行亚组分析,以确定城乡居民之间的潜在差异。结果:分析显示,农村受访者(N = 6,984)占8.7个百分点(p结论:结果表明,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,农村居民利用远程医疗服务的可能性低于城市居民,凸显了对农村居民获得医疗服务的担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信