The use and impact of prehospital blood lactate measurements in acute non-traumatic patients: a systematic review.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Louise Houlberg Walther, Hanne Beck Mieritz, Annmarie Touborg Lassen, Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Christian Backer Mogensen, Søren Mikkelsen, Anne Craveiro Brøchner
{"title":"The use and impact of prehospital blood lactate measurements in acute non-traumatic patients: a systematic review.","authors":"Louise Houlberg Walther, Hanne Beck Mieritz, Annmarie Touborg Lassen, Erika Frischknecht Christensen, Christian Backer Mogensen, Søren Mikkelsen, Anne Craveiro Brøchner","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01310-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prehospital use of blood lactate measurements is increasing. However, the test's benefits have not been methodically evaluated in non-trauma patients. This study had three aims: (1) To assess the evidence of prehospital blood lactate measurements' prognostic value in non-trauma patients, (2) to investigate to what extent the test changed early patient treatment, and (3) to evaluate the healthcare personnel's attitude towards the test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched until Aug 26, 2023. Cohort and randomized controlled trials assessing ≥ 20 acute non-trauma patients with prehospital lactate measurements were included if they reported (1) prognostic outcomes such as short-term mortality or (2) changes in early patient treatments. All study designs were included to assess (3) the healthcare personnel's opinion on prehospital lactate measurements. The risks of bias were assessed using the QUIPS tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the RoB-2. Study registration number CRD42020167169 (PROSPERO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 6028 study reports. We included 15 studies on (1) the prognostic value of prehospital lactate measurements. Elevated blood lactate levels were correlated to a higher short-term mortality risk in most of the studies but not in studies with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The 15 prognostic studies were all cohort studies with moderate or high risks of bias. Four studies investigated (2) early treatment changes. They found that the prehospital lactate measurement may have changed early treatment in sepsis patients. However, all four studies on treatment changes were at high risk of bias. Four studies were included on (3) the healthcare personnel's attitude towards the lactate measurement. Evidence of the healthcare personnel's opinion on prehospital lactate measurements was scarce.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most acute non-trauma patients with elevated prehospital lactate levels had increased risks of short-term mortality, except OHCA patients. Few studies suggested that measuring prehospital lactate levels could change early patient care, particularly in patients with suspected sepsis. The certainty of the evidence is low in this systematic review. The included studies were heterogeneous, and many had high risks of bias. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of prehospital lactate measurements on patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01310-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prehospital use of blood lactate measurements is increasing. However, the test's benefits have not been methodically evaluated in non-trauma patients. This study had three aims: (1) To assess the evidence of prehospital blood lactate measurements' prognostic value in non-trauma patients, (2) to investigate to what extent the test changed early patient treatment, and (3) to evaluate the healthcare personnel's attitude towards the test.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched until Aug 26, 2023. Cohort and randomized controlled trials assessing ≥ 20 acute non-trauma patients with prehospital lactate measurements were included if they reported (1) prognostic outcomes such as short-term mortality or (2) changes in early patient treatments. All study designs were included to assess (3) the healthcare personnel's opinion on prehospital lactate measurements. The risks of bias were assessed using the QUIPS tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the RoB-2. Study registration number CRD42020167169 (PROSPERO).

Results: We screened 6028 study reports. We included 15 studies on (1) the prognostic value of prehospital lactate measurements. Elevated blood lactate levels were correlated to a higher short-term mortality risk in most of the studies but not in studies with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The 15 prognostic studies were all cohort studies with moderate or high risks of bias. Four studies investigated (2) early treatment changes. They found that the prehospital lactate measurement may have changed early treatment in sepsis patients. However, all four studies on treatment changes were at high risk of bias. Four studies were included on (3) the healthcare personnel's attitude towards the lactate measurement. Evidence of the healthcare personnel's opinion on prehospital lactate measurements was scarce.

Conclusion: Most acute non-trauma patients with elevated prehospital lactate levels had increased risks of short-term mortality, except OHCA patients. Few studies suggested that measuring prehospital lactate levels could change early patient care, particularly in patients with suspected sepsis. The certainty of the evidence is low in this systematic review. The included studies were heterogeneous, and many had high risks of bias. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of prehospital lactate measurements on patient care.

院前血乳酸测量在急性非创伤患者中的应用和影响:一项系统综述。
背景:院前血乳酸测量的使用正在增加。然而,该测试的益处尚未在非创伤患者中进行系统评估。本研究有三个目的:(1)评估院前血乳酸测量对非创伤患者预后价值的证据;(2)调查该测试在多大程度上改变了患者的早期治疗;(3)评估医护人员对该测试的态度。方法:系统检索MEDLINE, Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,直到2023年8月26日。纳入队列和随机对照试验,评估≥20例院前乳酸测量的急性非创伤患者,如果他们报告了(1)预后结果,如短期死亡率或(2)早期患者治疗的变化。所有的研究设计都包括评估(3)卫生保健人员对院前乳酸测量的意见。使用QUIPS工具、Newcastle-Ottawa量表和rob2评估偏倚风险。研究注册号CRD42020167169 (PROSPERO)。结果:我们筛选了6028份研究报告。我们纳入了15项关于(1)院前乳酸测量的预后价值的研究。在大多数研究中,血乳酸水平升高与较高的短期死亡风险相关,但与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的研究无关。15项预后研究均为中等或高度偏倚风险的队列研究。四项研究调查了(2)早期治疗改变。他们发现院前乳酸测量可能改变了败血症患者的早期治疗。然而,所有四项关于治疗改变的研究都有很高的偏倚风险。(3)卫生保健人员对乳酸测量的态度。关于医护人员院前乳酸测量意见的证据很少。结论:大多数院前乳酸水平升高的急性非创伤患者短期死亡风险增加,OHCA患者除外。很少有研究表明,测量院前乳酸水平可以改变早期患者护理,特别是疑似败血症患者。本系统综述证据的确定性较低。纳入的研究是异质的,许多有很高的偏倚风险。院前乳酸测量对患者护理的影响需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信