Helicopter emergency medical services demonstrate reduced time to emergency anaesthesia in an undifferentiated trauma population: a retrospective observational analysis across three major trauma networks.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel Heritage, Joanne Griggs, Jack Barrett, Scott Clarke, Rory Carroll, Richard Lyon, Duncan Bootland
{"title":"Helicopter emergency medical services demonstrate reduced time to emergency anaesthesia in an undifferentiated trauma population: a retrospective observational analysis across three major trauma networks.","authors":"Daniel Heritage, Joanne Griggs, Jack Barrett, Scott Clarke, Rory Carroll, Richard Lyon, Duncan Bootland","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01313-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia (RSI) and tracheal intubation for patients with airway or ventilatory compromise following major trauma is recommended, with guidance suggesting a 45-min timeframe. Whilst on-scene RSI is recommended, the potential time benefit offered by Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has not been studied. We compared the time from 999/112 emergency call to delivery of RSI between patients intubated either in the Emergency Department or pre-hospital by HEMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study of major trauma patients in South-East England who received a pre-hospital RSI (PHRSI) or Emergency Department RSI (EDRSI) between 2 January 2018 and 24 September 2019. Data were extracted from the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network database. The primary outcome was the time from emergency call to delivery of RSI. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 30-days or hospital discharge, time from arrival of service at hospital or scene to RSI, time from emergency call to Computerised Tomography scan, and conveyance interval. Linear regression was used to model time to RSI in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 378 eligible patients, 209 patients met inclusion criteria. 103 received a PHRSI and 106 received an EDRSI. Most patients were male (n = 171, 82%) and the median age was 48 years (IQR 28-65). 94% sustained a blunt injury mechanism and head was the most injured body region for both cohorts (n = 134, 64%). 63% (n = 67) of patients receiving a PHRSI were conveyed by helicopter. PHRSI was delivered significantly earlier with a median of 64 [IQR 51-75] minutes (95% CI, 60-68) compared with EDRSI with a median of 84 [IQR 68-113] minutes (95% CI, 76-94), p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Major trauma patients who had a pre-hospital RSI received this time-critical intervention sooner after their injury than those who received an emergency anaesthetic after conveyance to a specialist hospital. Patient outcome benefit of HEMS delivered early RSI should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01313-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia (RSI) and tracheal intubation for patients with airway or ventilatory compromise following major trauma is recommended, with guidance suggesting a 45-min timeframe. Whilst on-scene RSI is recommended, the potential time benefit offered by Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) has not been studied. We compared the time from 999/112 emergency call to delivery of RSI between patients intubated either in the Emergency Department or pre-hospital by HEMS.

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of major trauma patients in South-East England who received a pre-hospital RSI (PHRSI) or Emergency Department RSI (EDRSI) between 2 January 2018 and 24 September 2019. Data were extracted from the UK Trauma Audit and Research Network database. The primary outcome was the time from emergency call to delivery of RSI. Secondary outcomes included mortality at 30-days or hospital discharge, time from arrival of service at hospital or scene to RSI, time from emergency call to Computerised Tomography scan, and conveyance interval. Linear regression was used to model time to RSI in both groups.

Results: Of 378 eligible patients, 209 patients met inclusion criteria. 103 received a PHRSI and 106 received an EDRSI. Most patients were male (n = 171, 82%) and the median age was 48 years (IQR 28-65). 94% sustained a blunt injury mechanism and head was the most injured body region for both cohorts (n = 134, 64%). 63% (n = 67) of patients receiving a PHRSI were conveyed by helicopter. PHRSI was delivered significantly earlier with a median of 64 [IQR 51-75] minutes (95% CI, 60-68) compared with EDRSI with a median of 84 [IQR 68-113] minutes (95% CI, 76-94), p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Major trauma patients who had a pre-hospital RSI received this time-critical intervention sooner after their injury than those who received an emergency anaesthetic after conveyance to a specialist hospital. Patient outcome benefit of HEMS delivered early RSI should be explored.

直升机紧急医疗服务表明,在未分化的创伤人群中,到紧急麻醉的时间缩短:对三个主要创伤网络的回顾性观察分析。
背景:对于严重创伤后气道或通气功能受损的患者,建议采用早期快速序列麻醉诱导(RSI)和气管插管,指导意见建议45分钟的时间框架。虽然现场重复性劳损是推荐的,但直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)提供的潜在时间效益尚未得到研究。我们比较了999/112次紧急呼叫到在急诊科或院前由HEMS插管的患者发生RSI的时间。方法:对2018年1月2日至2019年9月24日期间接受院前RSI (PHRSI)或急诊科RSI (EDRSI)的英格兰东南部重大创伤患者进行回顾性观察队列研究。数据来自英国创伤审计和研究网络数据库。主要结果是从紧急呼叫到RSI发生的时间。次要结局包括30天或出院时的死亡率,从到达医院或现场服务到RSI的时间,从紧急呼叫到计算机断层扫描的时间,以及运送间隔。采用线性回归对两组的RSI时间进行建模。结果:在378例患者中,209例患者符合纳入标准。103例接受PHRSI, 106例接受EDRSI。大多数患者为男性(n = 171, 82%),中位年龄48岁(IQR 28-65)。94%的患者为钝器损伤,两组患者中头部是最严重的损伤部位(n = 134, 64%)。接受PHRSI的患者中有63% (n = 67)由直升机运送。与EDRSI相比,PHRSI的中位数为64 [IQR 51-75]分钟(95% CI, 60-68),而EDRSI的中位数为84 [IQR 68-113]分钟(95% CI, 76-94)。p结论:院前RSI的严重创伤患者在受伤后比在转运到专科医院后接受紧急麻醉的患者更早接受这种时间关键干预。应探讨HEMS对早期RSI患者预后的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信