Elissa Dabkowski, Simon J Cooper, Jhodie Duncan, Karen Missen
{"title":"Investigating Falls Risk Awareness in Hospitals Using the Self-Awareness of Falls Risk Measure (SAFRM): Empirical Research Quantitative.","authors":"Elissa Dabkowski, Simon J Cooper, Jhodie Duncan, Karen Missen","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The overarching aim of this study was to explore patients' falls risk awareness in hospitals using section A of the validated Self Awareness of Falls Risk Measure (SAFRM).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive cross-sectional study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three rural/regional hospitals in the State of Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a purposive sampling strategy, patients were eligible to participate if aged ≥ 40 years, English-speaking, and have ambulatory capacity prior to hospital admission. Participants were excluded from the study if they returned a Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) score < 18. Falls risk awareness data was collected from both patient and health professionals using section A of the SAFRM. Patient demographic data was collected from patient medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 patients (72.9 years ±11.2) and 58 health professionals were recruited. Patients had a significant difference in falls risk awareness when compared to their clinician (z = -2.08, p = 0.038). Regression analyses showed that patients were more likely to overestimate their falls risk if they used anticoagulant medication and if their highest education level was less than or equal year 11. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a three-factor solution from section A of the SAFRM, which were labelled Physical Activity Awareness, Cognitive Awareness and Balance Awareness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant difference in patients' falls risk awareness compared to a health professional. The independent associations of variables with falls risk awareness, such as age, education level and medication use, further our understanding of the differences in falls risk awareness. The findings also establish that the 15-item section A SAFRM is a reliable and feasible falls risk perception measure for use in hospitals, with future research recommended to evaluate the proposed three-factor model with the addition of tailored hospital falls education.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The findings from this study establish a significant difference in patients' falls risk awareness compared to their health professional. Section A of the SAFRM is a reliable tool for nurses and other health professionals to establish the presence of a falls risk disparity. The ability to empirically measure this disparity and to determine an under- or overestimation of falls risk is a useful addition to clinical practice. The SAFRM facilitates a person-centred approach to falls prevention by providing opportunities for the clinician to collaborate with the patient and tailor fall prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Problem: Inpatient falls in hospital settings.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>There was a significant difference in patients' falls risk awareness compared to a health professional. Section A of the Self-Awareness of Falls Risk measure is a reliable and feasible tool to identify under- or overestimation of falls risk perception in hospitals. Patients were more likely to overestimate their falls risk if they used anticoagulant medication and if their highest education level was less than year 11. The findings for a three factor-model Physical Activity Awareness, Cognitive Awareness and Balance Awareness could inform future hospital falls education.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Registered nurses, health professionals, inpatients. Reporting Method: STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies. Patient or Public Contribution: This study involved the collection of data from patient participants and registered nurses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 1","pages":"e70099"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The overarching aim of this study was to explore patients' falls risk awareness in hospitals using section A of the validated Self Awareness of Falls Risk Measure (SAFRM).
Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study design.
Setting: Three rural/regional hospitals in the State of Victoria, Australia.
Methods: Using a purposive sampling strategy, patients were eligible to participate if aged ≥ 40 years, English-speaking, and have ambulatory capacity prior to hospital admission. Participants were excluded from the study if they returned a Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) score < 18. Falls risk awareness data was collected from both patient and health professionals using section A of the SAFRM. Patient demographic data was collected from patient medical records.
Results: A total of 77 patients (72.9 years ±11.2) and 58 health professionals were recruited. Patients had a significant difference in falls risk awareness when compared to their clinician (z = -2.08, p = 0.038). Regression analyses showed that patients were more likely to overestimate their falls risk if they used anticoagulant medication and if their highest education level was less than or equal year 11. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed a three-factor solution from section A of the SAFRM, which were labelled Physical Activity Awareness, Cognitive Awareness and Balance Awareness.
Conclusions: There was a significant difference in patients' falls risk awareness compared to a health professional. The independent associations of variables with falls risk awareness, such as age, education level and medication use, further our understanding of the differences in falls risk awareness. The findings also establish that the 15-item section A SAFRM is a reliable and feasible falls risk perception measure for use in hospitals, with future research recommended to evaluate the proposed three-factor model with the addition of tailored hospital falls education.
Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The findings from this study establish a significant difference in patients' falls risk awareness compared to their health professional. Section A of the SAFRM is a reliable tool for nurses and other health professionals to establish the presence of a falls risk disparity. The ability to empirically measure this disparity and to determine an under- or overestimation of falls risk is a useful addition to clinical practice. The SAFRM facilitates a person-centred approach to falls prevention by providing opportunities for the clinician to collaborate with the patient and tailor fall prevention strategies.
Impact: Problem: Inpatient falls in hospital settings.
Main findings: There was a significant difference in patients' falls risk awareness compared to a health professional. Section A of the Self-Awareness of Falls Risk measure is a reliable and feasible tool to identify under- or overestimation of falls risk perception in hospitals. Patients were more likely to overestimate their falls risk if they used anticoagulant medication and if their highest education level was less than year 11. The findings for a three factor-model Physical Activity Awareness, Cognitive Awareness and Balance Awareness could inform future hospital falls education.
Impact: Registered nurses, health professionals, inpatients. Reporting Method: STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies. Patient or Public Contribution: This study involved the collection of data from patient participants and registered nurses.
目的:本研究的主要目的是利用经验证的跌倒风险自我意识量表(SAFRM)的A部分,探讨医院患者的跌倒风险意识。设计:描述性横断面研究设计。地点:澳大利亚维多利亚州的三家农村/地区医院。方法:采用有目的的抽样策略,年龄≥40岁、会说英语、入院前有活动能力的患者入选。结果:共招募了77名患者(72.9岁±11.2岁)和58名卫生专业人员。与临床医生相比,患者在跌倒风险意识方面存在显著差异(z = -2.08, p = 0.038)。回归分析显示,如果患者使用抗凝药物,如果他们的最高教育水平低于或等于11年级,则患者更有可能高估他们跌倒的风险。探索性因素分析(EFA)揭示了SAFRM a部分的三因素解决方案,分别标记为身体活动意识,认知意识和平衡意识。结论:与健康专业人员相比,患者的跌倒风险意识有显著差异。年龄、受教育程度和用药情况等变量与跌倒风险意识的独立关联进一步加深了我们对跌倒风险意识差异的理解。研究结果还表明,15个项目的section A SAFRM是一种可靠和可行的医院使用的跌倒风险感知测量,建议未来的研究评估所提出的三因素模型,并增加量身定制的医院跌倒教育。对专业和/或患者护理的影响:本研究的结果表明,与健康专业人员相比,患者跌倒风险意识存在显著差异。SAFRM的A部分是护士和其他卫生专业人员确定跌倒风险差异存在的可靠工具。经验测量这种差异并确定对跌倒风险的低估或高估的能力是对临床实践的有益补充。SAFRM通过为临床医生提供与患者合作和量身定制跌倒预防策略的机会,促进了以人为本的跌倒预防方法。影响:问题:住院病人在医院环境中跌倒。主要发现:与健康专业人员相比,患者的跌倒风险意识有显著差异。跌落风险自我意识测量的A部分是一种可靠和可行的工具,用于识别医院对跌落风险感知的低估或高估。如果患者使用抗凝药物,如果他们的最高教育水平低于11年级,他们更有可能高估自己跌倒的风险。本研究结果可为未来医院跌倒教育提供参考。影响:注册护士、卫生专业人员、住院病人。报告方法:横断面研究的STROBE检查表。患者或公众贡献:本研究收集了患者参与者和注册护士的数据。
期刊介绍:
Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally