Orthopaedic Provider Coding Trends After 2021 Changes to the Current Procedural Terminology Evaluation and Management Coding Guidelines: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Dylan Koolmees, Micah T White, Jeffrey Murphy, Frederick M Azar, Clayton C Bettin
{"title":"Orthopaedic Provider Coding Trends After 2021 Changes to the Current Procedural Terminology Evaluation and Management Coding Guidelines: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Dylan Koolmees, Micah T White, Jeffrey Murphy, Frederick M Azar, Clayton C Bettin","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study was to determine changes in orthopaedic coding practices between December 2020 and January 2021 after training providers on the 2021 Current Procedural Terminology Evaluation and Management (E&M) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guideline changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outpatient encounters in December 2020, January 2021, December 2021, and January 2023 were grouped by provider and E&M code level. The codes used for established patients were 99211, 99212, 99213, 99214, and 99215, ordered from low to high-complexity visits. The codes used for new patients were 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, and 99205 also in order of complexity from low to high.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant increase was noted in coding levels for both new and established patients from December 2020 to January 2021 (P < 0.001). For new patients, there was an increase in level 4 codes from 16% to 54% and an increase in level 5 codes from 3% to 6% (P < 0.0001). This notable increase in level 4 and 5 codes was maintained through 2 years (January 2023) for new patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A statistically significant increase was noted in coding levels for both new and established patients since E&M guideline changes. This change was maintained for 2 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The goal of this study was to determine changes in orthopaedic coding practices between December 2020 and January 2021 after training providers on the 2021 Current Procedural Terminology Evaluation and Management (E&M) Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guideline changes.

Methods: Outpatient encounters in December 2020, January 2021, December 2021, and January 2023 were grouped by provider and E&M code level. The codes used for established patients were 99211, 99212, 99213, 99214, and 99215, ordered from low to high-complexity visits. The codes used for new patients were 99201, 99202, 99203, 99204, and 99205 also in order of complexity from low to high.

Results: A statistically significant increase was noted in coding levels for both new and established patients from December 2020 to January 2021 (P < 0.001). For new patients, there was an increase in level 4 codes from 16% to 54% and an increase in level 5 codes from 3% to 6% (P < 0.0001). This notable increase in level 4 and 5 codes was maintained through 2 years (January 2023) for new patients.

Conclusions: A statistically significant increase was noted in coding levels for both new and established patients since E&M guideline changes. This change was maintained for 2 years.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信