The role of whole-body bone scan in a rare case of colon cancer with lesions potentially mistaken for bone metastases but diagnosed as bony lesions of osteopetrosis.

IF 0.6 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Masume Soltanabadi, Raheleh Hedayati
{"title":"The role of whole-body bone scan in a rare case of colon cancer with lesions potentially mistaken for bone metastases but diagnosed as bony lesions of osteopetrosis.","authors":"Masume Soltanabadi, Raheleh Hedayati","doi":"10.5603/nmr.102031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone metastases are complications of many cancers, including colon cancer. Whole body bone scan is commonly used to detect bone metastases in these patients. Bone scan findings are sensitive for detecting metastases but with less experience and especially without the use of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) images, they are less specific. This means that while bone scans are effective at identifying areas of abnormal bone activity, they may not always distinguish between bone metastases and other conditions, such as fractures, infections, or benign bone diseases such as a rare condition like osteopetrosis, leading to potential false positives. This 52-year-old male patient was referred for a whole-body bone scan for evaluation of bone metastasis. At first glance, the scan pattern with multiple foci of increased radiotracer uptake seemed to indicate bone metastases due to the patient's colon cancer. However, upon closer inspection of the bone scan and careful attention to details such as bone deformities and cortical thickening, along with obtaining a more detailed patient history and reviewing other radiological records, the diagnosis of osteopetrosis was made.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case demonstrates the importance of carefully interpreting bone scan findings when diagnosing metastasis. It highlights that other benign diseases, including rare conditions such as osteopetrosis, can mimic the appearance of bone metastases on scans. Therefore, it is crucial to pay close attention to any abnormal patterns, like cortical thickening and bone deformity, and to thoroughly review the patient's medical history and other relevant clinical data and imaging findings. This comprehensive approach helps avoid misdiagnosis and ensures accurate interpretation of the scan results.</p>","PeriodicalId":44718,"journal":{"name":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","volume":"27 0","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/nmr.102031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone metastases are complications of many cancers, including colon cancer. Whole body bone scan is commonly used to detect bone metastases in these patients. Bone scan findings are sensitive for detecting metastases but with less experience and especially without the use of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) images, they are less specific. This means that while bone scans are effective at identifying areas of abnormal bone activity, they may not always distinguish between bone metastases and other conditions, such as fractures, infections, or benign bone diseases such as a rare condition like osteopetrosis, leading to potential false positives. This 52-year-old male patient was referred for a whole-body bone scan for evaluation of bone metastasis. At first glance, the scan pattern with multiple foci of increased radiotracer uptake seemed to indicate bone metastases due to the patient's colon cancer. However, upon closer inspection of the bone scan and careful attention to details such as bone deformities and cortical thickening, along with obtaining a more detailed patient history and reviewing other radiological records, the diagnosis of osteopetrosis was made.

Conclusions: This case demonstrates the importance of carefully interpreting bone scan findings when diagnosing metastasis. It highlights that other benign diseases, including rare conditions such as osteopetrosis, can mimic the appearance of bone metastases on scans. Therefore, it is crucial to pay close attention to any abnormal patterns, like cortical thickening and bone deformity, and to thoroughly review the patient's medical history and other relevant clinical data and imaging findings. This comprehensive approach helps avoid misdiagnosis and ensures accurate interpretation of the scan results.

全身骨扫描在一例罕见的结肠癌病例中的作用,该病例的病变可能被误认为是骨转移,但被诊断为骨质疏松症的骨病变。
背景:骨转移是许多癌症的并发症,包括结肠癌。全身骨扫描通常用于检测这些患者的骨转移。骨扫描结果对转移瘤的检测是敏感的,但由于经验不足,特别是在没有使用单光子发射计算机断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(SPECT/CT)图像的情况下,它们的特异性较低。这意味着尽管骨扫描在识别异常骨骼活动区域方面是有效的,但它们可能并不总是能够区分骨转移和其他情况,如骨折、感染或良性骨骼疾病,如骨质疏松症等罕见情况,从而导致潜在的假阳性。这名52岁男性患者接受了全身骨扫描以评估骨转移。乍一看,多灶放射示踪剂摄取增加的扫描模式似乎表明患者结肠癌引起的骨转移。然而,经过对骨扫描的仔细检查和对骨畸形和皮质增厚等细节的仔细关注,以及获得更详细的患者病史和回顾其他影像学记录,我们做出了骨质疏松的诊断。结论:本病例证明了在诊断转移时仔细解释骨扫描结果的重要性。它强调了其他良性疾病,包括罕见的疾病,如骨质疏松症,可以在扫描上模仿骨转移的外观。因此,密切关注任何异常模式,如皮质增厚和骨畸形,并彻底查阅患者的病史和其他相关临床资料和影像学表现是至关重要的。这种全面的方法有助于避免误诊,并确保扫描结果的准确解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Written in English, NMR is a biannual international periodical of scientific and educational profile. It is a journal of Bulgarian, Czech, Hungarian, Macedonian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian and Yugoslav Societies of Nuclear Medicine. The periodical focuses on all nuclear medicine topics (diagnostics as well as therapy), and presents original experimental scientific papers, reviews, case studies, letters also news about symposia and congresses. NMR is indexed at Index Copernicus (7.41), Scopus, EMBASE, Index Medicus/Medline, Ministry of Education 2007 (4 pts.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信