Improved Generalizability in Medical Computer Vision: Hyperbolic Deep Learning in Multi-Modality Neuroimaging.

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Cyrus Ayubcha, Sulaiman Sajed, Chady Omara, Anna B Veldman, Shashi B Singh, Yashas Ullas Lokesha, Alex Liu, Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan, Timothy R Smith, Andrew Beam
{"title":"Improved Generalizability in Medical Computer Vision: Hyperbolic Deep Learning in Multi-Modality Neuroimaging.","authors":"Cyrus Ayubcha, Sulaiman Sajed, Chady Omara, Anna B Veldman, Shashi B Singh, Yashas Ullas Lokesha, Alex Liu, Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan, Timothy R Smith, Andrew Beam","doi":"10.3390/jimaging10120319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning has shown significant value in automating radiological diagnostics but can be limited by a lack of generalizability to external datasets. Leveraging the geometric principles of non-Euclidean space, certain geometric deep learning approaches may offer an alternative means of improving model generalizability. This study investigates the potential advantages of hyperbolic convolutional neural networks (HCNNs) over traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in neuroimaging tasks. We conducted a comparative analysis of HCNNs and CNNs across various medical imaging modalities and diseases, with a focus on a compiled multi-modality neuroimaging dataset. The models were assessed for their performance parity, robustness to adversarial attacks, semantic organization of embedding spaces, and generalizability. Zero-shot evaluations were also performed with ischemic stroke non-contrast CT images. HCNNs matched CNNs' performance in less complex settings and demonstrated superior semantic organization and robustness to adversarial attacks. While HCNNs equaled CNNs in out-of-sample datasets identifying Alzheimer's disease, in zero-shot evaluations, HCNNs outperformed CNNs and radiologists. HCNNs deliver enhanced robustness and organization in neuroimaging data. This likely underlies why, while HCNNs perform similarly to CNNs with respect to in-sample tasks, they confer improved generalizability. Nevertheless, HCNNs encounter efficiency and performance challenges with larger, complex datasets. These limitations underline the need for further optimization of HCNN architectures. HCNNs present promising improvements in generalizability and resilience for medical imaging applications, particularly in neuroimaging. Despite facing challenges with larger datasets, HCNNs enhance performance under adversarial conditions and offer better semantic organization, suggesting valuable potential in generalizable deep learning models in medical imaging and neuroimaging diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"10 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10120319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep learning has shown significant value in automating radiological diagnostics but can be limited by a lack of generalizability to external datasets. Leveraging the geometric principles of non-Euclidean space, certain geometric deep learning approaches may offer an alternative means of improving model generalizability. This study investigates the potential advantages of hyperbolic convolutional neural networks (HCNNs) over traditional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in neuroimaging tasks. We conducted a comparative analysis of HCNNs and CNNs across various medical imaging modalities and diseases, with a focus on a compiled multi-modality neuroimaging dataset. The models were assessed for their performance parity, robustness to adversarial attacks, semantic organization of embedding spaces, and generalizability. Zero-shot evaluations were also performed with ischemic stroke non-contrast CT images. HCNNs matched CNNs' performance in less complex settings and demonstrated superior semantic organization and robustness to adversarial attacks. While HCNNs equaled CNNs in out-of-sample datasets identifying Alzheimer's disease, in zero-shot evaluations, HCNNs outperformed CNNs and radiologists. HCNNs deliver enhanced robustness and organization in neuroimaging data. This likely underlies why, while HCNNs perform similarly to CNNs with respect to in-sample tasks, they confer improved generalizability. Nevertheless, HCNNs encounter efficiency and performance challenges with larger, complex datasets. These limitations underline the need for further optimization of HCNN architectures. HCNNs present promising improvements in generalizability and resilience for medical imaging applications, particularly in neuroimaging. Despite facing challenges with larger datasets, HCNNs enhance performance under adversarial conditions and offer better semantic organization, suggesting valuable potential in generalizable deep learning models in medical imaging and neuroimaging diagnostics.

医学计算机视觉的改进泛化:多模态神经成像中的双曲深度学习。
深度学习在自动化放射诊断方面显示出重要的价值,但由于缺乏对外部数据集的通用性,它可能受到限制。利用非欧几里德空间的几何原理,某些几何深度学习方法可以提供一种提高模型泛化性的替代方法。本研究探讨了在神经成像任务中,双曲卷积神经网络(HCNNs)相对于传统卷积神经网络(cnn)的潜在优势。我们对不同医学成像方式和疾病的hcnn和cnn进行了比较分析,重点是编译的多模态神经成像数据集。对模型的性能奇偶性、对抗性攻击的鲁棒性、嵌入空间的语义组织和泛化性进行了评估。对缺血性脑卒中的非对比CT图像也进行了零射击评估。hcnn在不太复杂的环境下的表现与cnn相当,并且对对抗性攻击表现出优越的语义组织和鲁棒性。虽然hcnn在识别阿尔茨海默病的样本外数据集上与cnn持平,但在零射击评估中,hcnn的表现优于cnn和放射科医生。hcnn在神经成像数据中提供增强的鲁棒性和组织性。这可能是为什么,虽然hcnn在样本内任务方面的表现与cnn相似,但它们赋予了改进的泛化性。然而,hcnn在处理更大、更复杂的数据集时会遇到效率和性能方面的挑战。这些限制强调了进一步优化HCNN架构的必要性。hcnn在医学成像应用的通用性和弹性方面表现出有希望的改进,特别是在神经成像方面。尽管面临更大数据集的挑战,但hcnn在对抗条件下提高了性能,并提供了更好的语义组织,这表明在医学成像和神经成像诊断的可推广深度学习模型中具有宝贵的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信