Effect of Self-Measuring Blood Pressure Program on Hypertension Control: Analysis by Diabetes Status, Age, Gender, and Race in Rural Arizona.

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Joy Luzingu, Aminata Kilungo, Randall Flores, Zoe Baccam, Tenneh Turner-Warren, Thelma Reis, Babasola Okusanya, John Ehiri
{"title":"Effect of Self-Measuring Blood Pressure Program on Hypertension Control: Analysis by Diabetes Status, Age, Gender, and Race in Rural Arizona.","authors":"Joy Luzingu, Aminata Kilungo, Randall Flores, Zoe Baccam, Tenneh Turner-Warren, Thelma Reis, Babasola Okusanya, John Ehiri","doi":"10.3390/clinpract14060208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rural areas face numerous health challenges, including workforce shortages, limited training opportunities, and delayed care. These disparities can be mitigated by self-management interventions for diseases such as hypertension. This study assessed the implementation of a Self-Measuring Blood Pressure (SMBP) program in rural Arizona, documenting its barriers and patient experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this before-after study, participants were loaned a digital device which they used to self-measure and record blood pressure (BP) over 1 week or more for hypertension diagnosis or 4 weeks or more for monitoring. Blood pressure (BP) control was assessed per the guidelines of the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. BP changes between baseline and post-program were assessed using paired-Student t tests. Effect modification by diabetes was analyzed using stratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 740 participants, significant associations were found with gender, age, and controlled BP among non-diabetic patients. Post-intervention, 63.4% of diabetic patients showed controlled BP, and 25.7% of non-diabetic patients had controlled BP, with higher control rates among females and older age groups (60-79 years). Baseline mean SBP was 148.3 ± 19.6 mmHg, improving to 133.9 ± 14.6 mmHg; baseline DBP was 88.5 ± 33.6 mmHg, improving to 83.4 ± 9.6 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SMBP program effectively controlled BP, highlighting the value of combining clinical care with telemonitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"14 6","pages":"2637-2649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11674944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14060208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rural areas face numerous health challenges, including workforce shortages, limited training opportunities, and delayed care. These disparities can be mitigated by self-management interventions for diseases such as hypertension. This study assessed the implementation of a Self-Measuring Blood Pressure (SMBP) program in rural Arizona, documenting its barriers and patient experiences.

Methods: In this before-after study, participants were loaned a digital device which they used to self-measure and record blood pressure (BP) over 1 week or more for hypertension diagnosis or 4 weeks or more for monitoring. Blood pressure (BP) control was assessed per the guidelines of the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. BP changes between baseline and post-program were assessed using paired-Student t tests. Effect modification by diabetes was analyzed using stratification.

Results: Among 740 participants, significant associations were found with gender, age, and controlled BP among non-diabetic patients. Post-intervention, 63.4% of diabetic patients showed controlled BP, and 25.7% of non-diabetic patients had controlled BP, with higher control rates among females and older age groups (60-79 years). Baseline mean SBP was 148.3 ± 19.6 mmHg, improving to 133.9 ± 14.6 mmHg; baseline DBP was 88.5 ± 33.6 mmHg, improving to 83.4 ± 9.6 mmHg.

Conclusions: The SMBP program effectively controlled BP, highlighting the value of combining clinical care with telemonitoring.

自我测量血压计划对高血压控制的影响:亚利桑那农村糖尿病状况、年龄、性别和种族的分析
背景:农村地区面临许多卫生挑战,包括劳动力短缺、培训机会有限和护理延误。这些差异可以通过对高血压等疾病的自我管理干预来缓解。本研究评估了在亚利桑那州农村实施的自我测量血压(SMBP)计划,记录了其障碍和患者体验。方法:在这项前后对照研究中,受试者使用数字设备自我测量和记录血压(BP) 1周或更长时间,用于高血压诊断或4周或更长时间的监测。根据美国心脏协会和美国糖尿病协会的指南评估血压(BP)控制。使用配对学生t检验评估基线和计划后的血压变化。采用分层法分析糖尿病对疗效的影响。结果:在740名参与者中,非糖尿病患者的血压与性别、年龄和控制血压有显著相关性。干预后,63.4%的糖尿病患者血压得到控制,25.7%的非糖尿病患者血压得到控制,其中女性和年龄较大的人群(60-79岁)控制率较高。基线平均收缩压为148.3±19.6 mmHg,改善至133.9±14.6 mmHg;基线DBP为88.5±33.6 mmHg,改善至83.4±9.6 mmHg。结论:SMBP程序有效控制血压,突出临床护理与远程监测相结合的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信