Nellie Said Hani, Mary Ellen Vajravelu, Jennifer L Meijer, Harlan McCaffery, Julie Sturza, Emily Dhadphale, Joyce M Lee
{"title":"The Reproducibility and Reliability of Insulin Sensitivity and Secretion Indices in Children and Adolescents.","authors":"Nellie Said Hani, Mary Ellen Vajravelu, Jennifer L Meijer, Harlan McCaffery, Julie Sturza, Emily Dhadphale, Joyce M Lee","doi":"10.1155/2024/2136173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Insulin sensitivity and secretion indices can be useful tools in understanding insulin homeostasis in children at risk for diabetes. There have been few studies examining the reproducibility of these measures in pediatrics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether fasting or oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived insulin measures would be more reproducible and whether there would be differences based on weight, sex, race, and pubertal status.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical research unit.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Two hundred fifty-seven overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 85th%, <i>n</i> = 186) and normal weight (BMI < 85th%, <i>n</i> = 71) children without diabetes between ages of 8 and 17 were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>OGTT tests performed in study participants at two separate visits within a 3-week period. We performed two formal oral glucose tolerance tests within a 3-week period. The reproducibility of fasting measures was compared with OGTT-derived measures by weight categories and compared by weight, sex, race, and pubertal status. Comparisons were made between the correlation coefficients of fasting vs. OGTT-derived measures and between normal weight vs. obese/overweight participants, male vs. female, White vs. Black, and pre- vs. post-midpubertal. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each comparison as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For insulin sensitivity, the OGTT-derived measure was more reproducible than the fasting measures. There were no significant differences in reproducibility in the overweight/obese population compared to the normal weight population nor by sex, race, or pubertal status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonfasting insulin sensitivity measures are more reproducible than fasting insulin sensitivity measures, regardless of weight category. Insulin secretion measures have poor reproducibility overall. Weight status, sex, race, and midpubertal stage do not impact the reproducibility of insulin sensitivity and secretion measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19797,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Diabetes","volume":"2024 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2136173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Insulin sensitivity and secretion indices can be useful tools in understanding insulin homeostasis in children at risk for diabetes. There have been few studies examining the reproducibility of these measures in pediatrics.
Objective: To determine whether fasting or oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived insulin measures would be more reproducible and whether there would be differences based on weight, sex, race, and pubertal status.
Design: Observational study.
Setting: Clinical research unit.
Patients or other participants: Two hundred fifty-seven overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 85th%, n = 186) and normal weight (BMI < 85th%, n = 71) children without diabetes between ages of 8 and 17 were included in the study.
Methods: OGTT tests performed in study participants at two separate visits within a 3-week period. We performed two formal oral glucose tolerance tests within a 3-week period. The reproducibility of fasting measures was compared with OGTT-derived measures by weight categories and compared by weight, sex, race, and pubertal status. Comparisons were made between the correlation coefficients of fasting vs. OGTT-derived measures and between normal weight vs. obese/overweight participants, male vs. female, White vs. Black, and pre- vs. post-midpubertal. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for each comparison as well.
Results: For insulin sensitivity, the OGTT-derived measure was more reproducible than the fasting measures. There were no significant differences in reproducibility in the overweight/obese population compared to the normal weight population nor by sex, race, or pubertal status.
Conclusions: Nonfasting insulin sensitivity measures are more reproducible than fasting insulin sensitivity measures, regardless of weight category. Insulin secretion measures have poor reproducibility overall. Weight status, sex, race, and midpubertal stage do not impact the reproducibility of insulin sensitivity and secretion measures.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Diabetes is a bi-monthly journal devoted to disseminating new knowledge relating to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the journal is to become the leading vehicle for international dissemination of research and practice relating to diabetes in youth. Papers are considered for publication based on the rigor of scientific approach, novelty, and importance for understanding mechanisms involved in the epidemiology and etiology of this disease, especially its molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects. Work relating to the clinical presentation, course, management and outcome of diabetes, including its physical and emotional sequelae, is considered. In vitro studies using animal or human tissues, whole animal and clinical studies in humans are also considered. The journal reviews full-length papers, preliminary communications with important new information, clinical reports, and reviews of major topics. Invited editorials, commentaries, and perspectives are a regular feature. The editors, based in the USA, Europe, and Australasia, maintain regular communications to assure rapid turnaround time of submitted manuscripts.