The Health-Related Quality of Life for Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1111/os.14339
Mohanad Samaheen, Maen Mohammad, Mikhail Salzmann, Nikolai Ramadanov
{"title":"The Health-Related Quality of Life for Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Mohanad Samaheen, Maen Mohammad, Mikhail Salzmann, Nikolai Ramadanov","doi":"10.1111/os.14339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are a global health issue, with the choice between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty remaining a topic of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of the two surgical options on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mortality, and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients aged 50 years and older with femoral neck fractures. The primary outcome of interest was HRQoL as measured by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) score. Secondary outcomes included mortality, surgical, general, and local complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 20 RCTs with a total of 3680 patients with femoral neck fractures, of whom 1871 (50.5%) underwent cemented and 1809 (49.5%) uncemented hemiarthroplasty. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 years. The early (after 3-4 months) EQ-5D utility score (MD 0.07; 95% CI 0.03-0.12; p = 0.003; I <sup>2</sup> = 22%) and the 12-month EQ-5D utility score (MD 0.08; 95% CI 0.00-0.16; p = 0.04; I <sup>2</sup> = 67%) suggested an improved HRQoL in the cemented hemiarthroplasty group. The outcomes of 1-year mortality, requirement for additional surgeries, surgery duration, risk of pulmonary embolism, pressure sores or ulcers, intraoperative fractures, and periprosthetic or postoperative fractures demonstrated significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of cemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures presented better results when compared to uncemented hemiarthroplasty in terms of HRQoL during the first year after surgery and greater mortality reduction at 1 year follow-up and reduced the need for further surgery. Therefore, the use of cemented hemiarthroplasty may be preferred for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"361-372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787973/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are a global health issue, with the choice between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty remaining a topic of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of the two surgical options on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mortality, and functional outcomes.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients aged 50 years and older with femoral neck fractures. The primary outcome of interest was HRQoL as measured by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) score. Secondary outcomes included mortality, surgical, general, and local complications.

Results: We included 20 RCTs with a total of 3680 patients with femoral neck fractures, of whom 1871 (50.5%) underwent cemented and 1809 (49.5%) uncemented hemiarthroplasty. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 6 years. The early (after 3-4 months) EQ-5D utility score (MD 0.07; 95% CI 0.03-0.12; p = 0.003; I 2 = 22%) and the 12-month EQ-5D utility score (MD 0.08; 95% CI 0.00-0.16; p = 0.04; I 2 = 67%) suggested an improved HRQoL in the cemented hemiarthroplasty group. The outcomes of 1-year mortality, requirement for additional surgeries, surgery duration, risk of pulmonary embolism, pressure sores or ulcers, intraoperative fractures, and periprosthetic or postoperative fractures demonstrated significant differences between the two groups.

Conclusions: The use of cemented hemiarthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures presented better results when compared to uncemented hemiarthroplasty in terms of HRQoL during the first year after surgery and greater mortality reduction at 1 year follow-up and reduced the need for further surgery. Therefore, the use of cemented hemiarthroplasty may be preferred for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.

老年股骨颈骨折患者骨水泥与非骨水泥半关节置换术的健康相关生活质量:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:老年人股骨颈骨折是一个全球性的健康问题,选择骨水泥和非骨水泥半关节置换术仍然是一个有争议的话题。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较两种手术选择对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、死亡率和功能结局的影响。方法:我们检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,比较50岁及以上股骨颈骨折患者骨水泥与非骨水泥半关节置换术的随机对照试验(rct)。主要观察指标为HRQoL,由欧洲生活质量5维问卷(EQ-5D)评分衡量。次要结局包括死亡率、手术、一般和局部并发症。结果:我们纳入了20项随机对照试验,共纳入3680例股骨颈骨折患者,其中1871例(50.5%)行骨水泥半关节置换术,1809例(49.5%)行非骨水泥半关节置换术。随访时间为1 - 6年。早期(3-4个月后)EQ-5D效用评分(MD 0.07;95% ci 0.03-0.12;p = 0.003;I2 = 22%)和12个月EQ-5D效用评分(MD 0.08;95% ci 0.00-0.16;p = 0.04;I2 = 67%)表明骨水泥半关节置换术组HRQoL有所改善。两组1年死亡率、额外手术需求、手术持续时间、肺栓塞、压疮或溃疡、术中骨折、假体周围或术后骨折的风险均有显著差异。结论:股骨颈骨折患者采用骨水泥半关节置换术后第一年的HRQoL优于非骨水泥半关节置换术,随访1年死亡率降低幅度更大,减少了进一步手术的需要。因此,骨水泥半关节置换术可能是治疗老年股骨颈骨折的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信