Replacing Traditional Aseptic Process Simulations with Qualification of Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) Supernatant.

Q3 Medicine
Bernardo Perez, Johanna O'Bannon
{"title":"Replacing Traditional Aseptic Process Simulations with Qualification of Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) Supernatant.","authors":"Bernardo Perez, Johanna O'Bannon","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024.99910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aseptic process simulations (APS) are traditionally performed using Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) as a surrogate for finished product to qualify aseptic manufacturing operations. In this study, the supernatant from cell processing media was examined for bacterial and fungal growth viability to determine equivalency with TSB. With the use of cell processing media in Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) manufacturing, can qualifying the supernatant collected from the process eliminate the need for an APS run?Supernatant was collected from cell processing media and incubated at same incubations conditions required for the APS post sterility check (Test A - 7d 20-25°C/7d 30-35°C) and at use conditions (Test B - 14 d at 35°C/5%CO/5%O2). Post incubation, growth promotion testing was performed using ATCC cultures (Ab+, Bs+, Ca+, Ec+, Sa+, Pa+ and Se+), which resulted in growth for Tests A-B and the positive inoculum control. Results concluded that the cell processing supernatant examined was equivalent to TSB, thereby implying that each cell therapy manufacturing run is aseptically self-validating. As more practical approaches emerge for APS qualifications in CGT manufacturing, this data can be used to implement alternate options to qualify a CGT manufacturing process and help establish guidelines for future cell therapy APS qualifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":"78 6","pages":"769-770"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024.99910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aseptic process simulations (APS) are traditionally performed using Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) as a surrogate for finished product to qualify aseptic manufacturing operations. In this study, the supernatant from cell processing media was examined for bacterial and fungal growth viability to determine equivalency with TSB. With the use of cell processing media in Cell and Gene Therapy (CGT) manufacturing, can qualifying the supernatant collected from the process eliminate the need for an APS run?Supernatant was collected from cell processing media and incubated at same incubations conditions required for the APS post sterility check (Test A - 7d 20-25°C/7d 30-35°C) and at use conditions (Test B - 14 d at 35°C/5%CO/5%O2). Post incubation, growth promotion testing was performed using ATCC cultures (Ab+, Bs+, Ca+, Ec+, Sa+, Pa+ and Se+), which resulted in growth for Tests A-B and the positive inoculum control. Results concluded that the cell processing supernatant examined was equivalent to TSB, thereby implying that each cell therapy manufacturing run is aseptically self-validating. As more practical approaches emerge for APS qualifications in CGT manufacturing, this data can be used to implement alternate options to qualify a CGT manufacturing process and help establish guidelines for future cell therapy APS qualifications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信