Animal Models of Intervertebral Disc Diseases: Advantages, Limitations, and Future Directions.

IF 3.2 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jin Young Hong, Hyunseong Kim, Wan-Jin Jeon, Changhwan Yeo, Hyun Kim, Junseon Lee, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha
{"title":"Animal Models of Intervertebral Disc Diseases: Advantages, Limitations, and Future Directions.","authors":"Jin Young Hong, Hyunseong Kim, Wan-Jin Jeon, Changhwan Yeo, Hyun Kim, Junseon Lee, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha","doi":"10.3390/neurolint16060129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal models are valuable tools for studying the underlying mechanisms of and potential treatments for intervertebral disc diseases. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of animal models of disc diseases, focusing on lumbar spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and degeneration, as well as future research directions. The advantages of animal models are that they enable controlled experiments, long-term monitoring to study the natural history of the disease, and the testing of potential treatments. However, they also have limitations, including species differences, ethical concerns, a lack of standardized protocols, and short lifespans. Therefore, ongoing research focuses on improving animal model standardization and incorporating advanced imaging and noninvasive techniques, genetic models, and biomechanical analyses to overcome these limitations. These future directions hold potential for improving our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of disc diseases and for developing new treatments. Overall, although animal models can provide valuable insights into pathophysiology and potential treatments for disc diseases, their limitations should be carefully considered when interpreting findings from animal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"16 6","pages":"1788-1818"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11678881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint16060129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal models are valuable tools for studying the underlying mechanisms of and potential treatments for intervertebral disc diseases. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of animal models of disc diseases, focusing on lumbar spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and degeneration, as well as future research directions. The advantages of animal models are that they enable controlled experiments, long-term monitoring to study the natural history of the disease, and the testing of potential treatments. However, they also have limitations, including species differences, ethical concerns, a lack of standardized protocols, and short lifespans. Therefore, ongoing research focuses on improving animal model standardization and incorporating advanced imaging and noninvasive techniques, genetic models, and biomechanical analyses to overcome these limitations. These future directions hold potential for improving our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of disc diseases and for developing new treatments. Overall, although animal models can provide valuable insights into pathophysiology and potential treatments for disc diseases, their limitations should be carefully considered when interpreting findings from animal studies.

椎间盘疾病的动物模型:优势、局限性和未来方向。
动物模型是研究椎间盘疾病的潜在机制和潜在治疗方法的重要工具。本文综述了椎间盘疾病动物模型的优点和局限性,重点讨论了腰椎管狭窄、椎间盘突出和退变,以及未来的研究方向。动物模型的优点是可以进行控制实验,长期监测以研究疾病的自然历史,并测试潜在的治疗方法。然而,它们也有局限性,包括物种差异、伦理问题、缺乏标准化协议以及寿命短。因此,正在进行的研究重点是提高动物模型的标准化,并结合先进的成像和无创技术,遗传模型和生物力学分析来克服这些局限性。这些未来的方向有可能提高我们对椎间盘疾病的潜在机制的理解,并开发新的治疗方法。总的来说,尽管动物模型可以为椎间盘疾病的病理生理学和潜在治疗提供有价值的见解,但在解释动物研究结果时应仔细考虑其局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology International
Neurology International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信