Risk score for two-year mortality following carotid endarterectomy performed for symptomatic stenosis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Matthew Blecha, Lorela Weise, Amy Liu, Karen Yuan, Travis Terry, Kosmas I Paraskevas
{"title":"Risk score for two-year mortality following carotid endarterectomy performed for symptomatic stenosis.","authors":"Matthew Blecha, Lorela Weise, Amy Liu, Karen Yuan, Travis Terry, Kosmas I Paraskevas","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to identify variables at the time of clinical presentation that place patients at higher risk for mortality following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic lesions. Further, this study will create a risk score for mortality within 2 years following CEA for symptomatic stenosis to help tailor future postoperative and long-term management by identifying patients who require heightened vigilance in postoperative care to facilitate survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Vascular Quality Initiative CEA module was queried for procedures performed for symptomatic (within 180 days) carotid bifurcation stenosis. After exclusions, 24,713 met study inclusion. Univariable analysis for the binary outcome of mortality within 2 years of surgery was performed with χ<sup>2</sup> testing for categorical variables and Student t-test for ordinal variables. Multivariable binary logistic regression was then performed utilizing variables that achieved univariable significance (P < .05) for the outcome. Variables with a multivariable P value ≤ .05 were included in the risk score and weighted based on their respective regression beta-coefficient in a point scale. Variables with a beta-coefficient of less than .25 were assigned 1 point, and then a point was added for each rise in beta-coefficient at .25 intervals. The risk score was then tested utilizing 20,668 patients deemed to be of acceptable surgical risk who underwent carotid stenting for symptomatic disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variables that achieved multivariable significance (P<.05) towards the outcome of mortality within 2 years of symptomatic CEA that were included in the risk score were: home status within the top 20% of area deprivation index (most disadvantaged) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.20); female sex (aOR, 1.157); body mass index <20 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (aOR, 1.49); any history of tobacco smoking (aOR, 1.39); coronary artery disease (aOR, 1.47); history of congestive heart failure (aOR, 1.47); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.45); baseline renal insufficiency (aOR, 1.46); end-stage renal disease dialysis status at presentation (aOR, 2.38); American Society of Anesthesiology class 4 operative risk designation (aOR, 1.33); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 1.16); anemia (aOR, 2.09); history of peripheral artery intervention (aOR, 1.20); history of major lower extremity amputation (aOR, 1.93); prior CEA or carotid stenting (aOR, 1.32); escalating preoperative modified Rankin score (aOR, 4.46); and escalating age (aOR, 1.04/year). A steep escalation was noted from 2-year mortality rates of <4% for patients with risk scores of ≤4 to >35% for patients with scores of ≥17. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit testing for the multivariable regression analysis revealed an overall accuracy of 93.1% for the model, with 99.9% accuracy in predicting survival. Model testing in the symptomatic carotid stenting cohort revealed excellent correlation with no statistical difference in the mortality rate at 16 of the 19 risk score data points and a near identical mortality escalation pattern with rising risk score. When applied to the validation cohort, the risk score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and a Hosmer-Lemeshow overall accuracy of 91.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A risk score with quality accuracy in determining 2-year survival after CEA performed for symptomatic stenosis has been developed. Severity of preoperative stroke, dialysis status, baseline anemia, advancing age, low body weight, and cardiopulmonary comorbidities are the most deleterious variables negatively impacting survival. The score has utility in patient shared decision-making and expectation counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify variables at the time of clinical presentation that place patients at higher risk for mortality following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic lesions. Further, this study will create a risk score for mortality within 2 years following CEA for symptomatic stenosis to help tailor future postoperative and long-term management by identifying patients who require heightened vigilance in postoperative care to facilitate survival.

Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative CEA module was queried for procedures performed for symptomatic (within 180 days) carotid bifurcation stenosis. After exclusions, 24,713 met study inclusion. Univariable analysis for the binary outcome of mortality within 2 years of surgery was performed with χ2 testing for categorical variables and Student t-test for ordinal variables. Multivariable binary logistic regression was then performed utilizing variables that achieved univariable significance (P < .05) for the outcome. Variables with a multivariable P value ≤ .05 were included in the risk score and weighted based on their respective regression beta-coefficient in a point scale. Variables with a beta-coefficient of less than .25 were assigned 1 point, and then a point was added for each rise in beta-coefficient at .25 intervals. The risk score was then tested utilizing 20,668 patients deemed to be of acceptable surgical risk who underwent carotid stenting for symptomatic disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Results: Variables that achieved multivariable significance (P<.05) towards the outcome of mortality within 2 years of symptomatic CEA that were included in the risk score were: home status within the top 20% of area deprivation index (most disadvantaged) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.20); female sex (aOR, 1.157); body mass index <20 kg/m2 (aOR, 1.49); any history of tobacco smoking (aOR, 1.39); coronary artery disease (aOR, 1.47); history of congestive heart failure (aOR, 1.47); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.45); baseline renal insufficiency (aOR, 1.46); end-stage renal disease dialysis status at presentation (aOR, 2.38); American Society of Anesthesiology class 4 operative risk designation (aOR, 1.33); diabetes mellitus (aOR, 1.16); anemia (aOR, 2.09); history of peripheral artery intervention (aOR, 1.20); history of major lower extremity amputation (aOR, 1.93); prior CEA or carotid stenting (aOR, 1.32); escalating preoperative modified Rankin score (aOR, 4.46); and escalating age (aOR, 1.04/year). A steep escalation was noted from 2-year mortality rates of <4% for patients with risk scores of ≤4 to >35% for patients with scores of ≥17. Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit testing for the multivariable regression analysis revealed an overall accuracy of 93.1% for the model, with 99.9% accuracy in predicting survival. Model testing in the symptomatic carotid stenting cohort revealed excellent correlation with no statistical difference in the mortality rate at 16 of the 19 risk score data points and a near identical mortality escalation pattern with rising risk score. When applied to the validation cohort, the risk score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 and a Hosmer-Lemeshow overall accuracy of 91.3%.

Conclusions: A risk score with quality accuracy in determining 2-year survival after CEA performed for symptomatic stenosis has been developed. Severity of preoperative stroke, dialysis status, baseline anemia, advancing age, low body weight, and cardiopulmonary comorbidities are the most deleterious variables negatively impacting survival. The score has utility in patient shared decision-making and expectation counseling.

症状性狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术后两年死亡率的风险评分。
目的:本研究的目的是确定临床表现时的变量,这些变量使患者在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后出现症状性病变的死亡率更高。此外,本研究将创建症状性狭窄CEA术后两年内死亡率的风险评分,通过识别需要在术后护理中提高警惕以促进生存的患者,帮助定制未来的术后和长期管理。方法:查询血管质量倡议(VQI) CEA模块,用于治疗症状性(180天内)颈动脉分叉狭窄。排除后,24,713例符合研究纳入。对两年内手术死亡率的二元结果进行单变量分析,对分类变量进行卡方检验,对顺序变量进行学生t检验。然后利用达到单变量显著性的变量进行多变量二元逻辑回归(结果:达到多变量显著性的变量(P2 (aOR 1.49);有吸烟史(aOR 1.39);冠状动脉疾病(or .47);充血性心力衰竭史(aOR 1.47);慢性阻塞性肺疾病(aOR 1.45);基线肾功能不全(aOR 1.46);终末期肾病就诊时透析状况(aOR 2.38);美国麻醉学会4级手术风险认定(ASA 4级)(aOR1.33);糖尿病(aOR 1.16);贫血(aOR 2.09);外周动脉介入史(or .20);下肢大截肢史(aOR 1.93);既往CEA或颈动脉支架植入(aOR 1.32);术前改良Rankin评分升高(aOR 4.46);年龄递增(aOR 1.04/年)。评分≥17的患者两年死亡率急剧上升,为35%。Hosmer和Lemeshow对多变量回归分析的拟合优度检验显示,该模型的总体准确率为93.1%,预测生存率的准确率为99.9%。在有症状的颈动脉支架置入队列中的模型检验显示,在19个风险评分数据点中,有16个死亡率无统计学差异,并且随着风险评分的上升,死亡率呈几乎相同的上升模式。当应用于验证队列时,风险评分的AUC值为0.70,Hosmer-Lemeshow总体准确性为91.3%。结论:已经开发出一种质量准确的风险评分,用于确定症状性狭窄患者行CEA后的两年生存率。术前中风的严重程度、透析状态、基线贫血、高龄、体重过低和心肺合并症是影响生存率的最有害变量。该评分在患者共同决策和期望咨询中具有实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信