Lack of Prescription Drug Benefit Knowledge and Problems Paying Medical Bills Among Medicare Beneficiaries

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
McKayla Massey, Kathryn Litten, Samuel D. Towne Jr., Vasiliki Beleri, Chanhyun Park, Boon Peng Ng
{"title":"Lack of Prescription Drug Benefit Knowledge and Problems Paying Medical Bills Among Medicare Beneficiaries","authors":"McKayla Massey,&nbsp;Kathryn Litten,&nbsp;Samuel D. Towne Jr.,&nbsp;Vasiliki Beleri,&nbsp;Chanhyun Park,&nbsp;Boon Peng Ng","doi":"10.1111/jep.14290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 50% of Americans report having low health insurance literacy, leading to uncertainty when choosing their insurance coverage to best meet their healthcare needs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between lack of prescription drug benefit knowledge and problems paying medical bills among Medicare beneficiaries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analysed the 2021 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File of 5586 Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years. The binary dependent variable was whether beneficiaries had problems paying medical bills in the past year. The categorical independent variable was how much beneficiaries knew about the Medicare prescription drug benefit. A survey-weighted multivariable logit model, adjusted for covariates (e.g., socio-demographics, comorbidities, private insurance coverage, and satisfaction with out-of-pocket costs), was conducted to examine the association between the independent variable and problems paying medical bills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 4.3% of study beneficiaries (~2.0 million beneficiaries) reported problems paying medical bills. Of those without and with problems paying medical bills, 27.7% and 39.6%, respectively, reported knowing little/almost nothing about prescription drug benefits. Beneficiaries aged 65–74 years (marginal effect [ME] = 2.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), with comorbidities (e.g., ≥ 4 conditions, ME = 3.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), dissatisfaction with out-of-pocket costs (ME = 10.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), without private insurance (e.g., employer-sponsored insurance, ME = 2.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), or with little/almost no knowledge of prescription drug benefits (ME = 1.9%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) were more likely to report problems paying medical bills compared to their counterparts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Tailored programmes aimed at improving beneficiaries' knowledge of prescription drug benefits, reducing out-of-pocket costs and preventing comorbidities may be considered for the at-risk population to address the problem.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and Objectives

Approximately 50% of Americans report having low health insurance literacy, leading to uncertainty when choosing their insurance coverage to best meet their healthcare needs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between lack of prescription drug benefit knowledge and problems paying medical bills among Medicare beneficiaries.

Methods

We analysed the 2021 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey Public Use File of 5586 Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥ 65 years. The binary dependent variable was whether beneficiaries had problems paying medical bills in the past year. The categorical independent variable was how much beneficiaries knew about the Medicare prescription drug benefit. A survey-weighted multivariable logit model, adjusted for covariates (e.g., socio-demographics, comorbidities, private insurance coverage, and satisfaction with out-of-pocket costs), was conducted to examine the association between the independent variable and problems paying medical bills.

Results

Approximately 4.3% of study beneficiaries (~2.0 million beneficiaries) reported problems paying medical bills. Of those without and with problems paying medical bills, 27.7% and 39.6%, respectively, reported knowing little/almost nothing about prescription drug benefits. Beneficiaries aged 65–74 years (marginal effect [ME] = 2.1%, p < 0.01), with comorbidities (e.g., ≥ 4 conditions, ME = 3.8%, p < 0.001), dissatisfaction with out-of-pocket costs (ME = 10.1%, p < 0.001), without private insurance (e.g., employer-sponsored insurance, ME = 2.5%, p < 0.01), or with little/almost no knowledge of prescription drug benefits (ME = 1.9%, p < 0.05) were more likely to report problems paying medical bills compared to their counterparts.

Conclusion

Tailored programmes aimed at improving beneficiaries' knowledge of prescription drug benefits, reducing out-of-pocket costs and preventing comorbidities may be considered for the at-risk population to address the problem.

医疗保险受益人处方药福利知识的缺乏与医疗费用支付问题。
目的和目标:大约50%的美国人报告说他们的健康保险知识水平较低,这导致他们在选择保险范围以最好地满足他们的医疗保健需求时不确定。因此,我们旨在评估缺乏处方药福利知识与医疗保险受益人支付医疗费用问题之间的关系。方法:对5586名年龄≥65岁的医疗保险受益人的2021年医疗保险现行受益人调查公共使用档案进行分析。二元因变量是受益人在过去一年中是否有支付医疗费用的问题。分类自变量是受益人对医疗保险处方药福利的了解程度。采用调查加权的多变量logit模型,对协变量(如社会人口统计学、合并症、私人保险覆盖范围和自付费用满意度)进行调整,以检验自变量与支付医疗费用问题之间的关联。结果:大约4.3%的研究受益人(约200万受益人)报告在支付医疗费用方面存在问题。在支付医药费没有问题和有问题的人中,分别有27.7%和39.6%的人表示对处方药的好处知之甚少或几乎一无所知。结论:针对高危人群,可考虑制定针对性的方案,提高受益人对处方药福利的了解,降低自付费用,预防合并症,以解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信