Gerardo Tusman, Adriana G Scandurra, Stephan H Böhm, Noelia I Echeverría, Gustavo Meschino, P Kremeier, Fernando Suarez Sipmann
{"title":"Noninvasive estimation of PaCO<sub>2</sub> from volumetric capnography in animals with injured lungs: an Artificial Intelligence approach.","authors":"Gerardo Tusman, Adriana G Scandurra, Stephan H Böhm, Noelia I Echeverría, Gustavo Meschino, P Kremeier, Fernando Suarez Sipmann","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01253-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the feasibility of non-invasively estimating the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) using a computational Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography (VCap) parameters. In 14 lung-lavaged pigs, we continuously measured PaCO<sub>2</sub> with an optical intravascular catheter and VCap on a breath-by-breath basis. Animals were mechanically ventilated with fixed settings and subjected to 0 to 22 cmH<sub>2</sub>O of positive end-expiratory pressure steps. The resultant 8599 pairs of data points - one PaCO<sub>2</sub> value matched with twelve Vcap and ventilatory parameters derived in one breath - fed the ANFIS model. The data was separated into 7370 data points for training the model (85%) and 1229 for testing (15%). The ANFIS analysis was repeated 10 independent times, randomly mixing the total data points. Bland-Altman plot (accuracy and precision), root mean square error (quality of prediction) and four-quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes (trending ability) between reference and estimated PaCO<sub>2</sub> were analyzed. The Bland-Altman plot performed in 10 independent tested ANFIS models showed a mean bias between reference and estimated PaCO<sub>2</sub> of 0.03 ± 0.03 mmHg, with limits of agreement of 2.25 ± 0.42 mmHg, and a root mean square error of 1.15 ± 0.06 mmHg. A good trending ability was confirmed by four quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes of 95.5% and 94.3%, respectively. In an animal lung injury model, the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography parameters can estimate PaCO<sub>2</sub> with high accuracy, acceptable precision, and good trending ability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01253-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To investigate the feasibility of non-invasively estimating the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) using a computational Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography (VCap) parameters. In 14 lung-lavaged pigs, we continuously measured PaCO2 with an optical intravascular catheter and VCap on a breath-by-breath basis. Animals were mechanically ventilated with fixed settings and subjected to 0 to 22 cmH2O of positive end-expiratory pressure steps. The resultant 8599 pairs of data points - one PaCO2 value matched with twelve Vcap and ventilatory parameters derived in one breath - fed the ANFIS model. The data was separated into 7370 data points for training the model (85%) and 1229 for testing (15%). The ANFIS analysis was repeated 10 independent times, randomly mixing the total data points. Bland-Altman plot (accuracy and precision), root mean square error (quality of prediction) and four-quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes (trending ability) between reference and estimated PaCO2 were analyzed. The Bland-Altman plot performed in 10 independent tested ANFIS models showed a mean bias between reference and estimated PaCO2 of 0.03 ± 0.03 mmHg, with limits of agreement of 2.25 ± 0.42 mmHg, and a root mean square error of 1.15 ± 0.06 mmHg. A good trending ability was confirmed by four quadrant and polar plots concordance indexes of 95.5% and 94.3%, respectively. In an animal lung injury model, the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System model fed by noninvasive volumetric capnography parameters can estimate PaCO2 with high accuracy, acceptable precision, and good trending ability.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.