Assessing and upgrading the cleanliness of the emergency department brief title: upgrading the emergency room's cleanliness.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Elisheva Levine, Samar Abo-Gush, Bath Sheva Ezagui, Ruth David, Puah Kopuit, Naama Bagrish, Todd Zalut, Marc V Assous, Yossi Freier-Dror, Amos M Yinnon, Shmuel Benenson
{"title":"Assessing and upgrading the cleanliness of the emergency department brief title: upgrading the emergency room's cleanliness.","authors":"Elisheva Levine, Samar Abo-Gush, Bath Sheva Ezagui, Ruth David, Puah Kopuit, Naama Bagrish, Todd Zalut, Marc V Assous, Yossi Freier-Dror, Amos M Yinnon, Shmuel Benenson","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To upgrade cleaning and disinfection of patient rooms in a crowded emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, 3-component, before-and-after intervention study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Phase 1 consisted of a 4-week baseline determination of ED patient-room cleanliness, using two means: (1) the fluorescence spray, applied before cleaning and assessed subsequently with an ultraviolet lamp. Results are expressed as % of removed spots/all spots (≥7/10 cleaned spots/room was considered clean; (2) ATP swabs obtained after cleaning, which test for presence of residual organic material; readings <45 were considered clean. Phase 2 consisted of revision and reorganization of established cleaning practices. Phase 3 consisted of adding one cleaning person in afternoon/evening shifts, for 4-weeks, during which room cleanliness was assessed as previously described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cleanliness of the 79 patient rooms, for which fluorescence tests were available from before and after cleaning for all three phases of the study, increased from a baseline of 50% ± 35 removed spots/all spots, to 61% ± 36 after the first intervention (CI95 -0.6 - 21, <i>P</i> = 0.54) and to 68% ± 35 after the second intervention (CI95 5 - 31, <i>P</i> = 0.004, as compared to the baseline). Subanalysis showed that evening shifts improved most remarkably, from 47% ± 32 (n = 45), to 60% ± 33 (n = 49) to 76%±29 (n = 29), respectively, from baseline through the second and third phase (<i>P</i> = 0.001). ATP testing appeared less sensitive for assessment of cleanliness but confirmed the assessment by fluorescence for overall cleanliness (CI95 1 - 14, <i>P</i> = 0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrate that a two-step intervention significantly improves cleaning in a busy ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To upgrade cleaning and disinfection of patient rooms in a crowded emergency department (ED).

Setting: Tertiary referral hospital.

Design: Prospective, 3-component, before-and-after intervention study.

Methods: Phase 1 consisted of a 4-week baseline determination of ED patient-room cleanliness, using two means: (1) the fluorescence spray, applied before cleaning and assessed subsequently with an ultraviolet lamp. Results are expressed as % of removed spots/all spots (≥7/10 cleaned spots/room was considered clean; (2) ATP swabs obtained after cleaning, which test for presence of residual organic material; readings <45 were considered clean. Phase 2 consisted of revision and reorganization of established cleaning practices. Phase 3 consisted of adding one cleaning person in afternoon/evening shifts, for 4-weeks, during which room cleanliness was assessed as previously described.

Results: Cleanliness of the 79 patient rooms, for which fluorescence tests were available from before and after cleaning for all three phases of the study, increased from a baseline of 50% ± 35 removed spots/all spots, to 61% ± 36 after the first intervention (CI95 -0.6 - 21, P = 0.54) and to 68% ± 35 after the second intervention (CI95 5 - 31, P = 0.004, as compared to the baseline). Subanalysis showed that evening shifts improved most remarkably, from 47% ± 32 (n = 45), to 60% ± 33 (n = 49) to 76%±29 (n = 29), respectively, from baseline through the second and third phase (P = 0.001). ATP testing appeared less sensitive for assessment of cleanliness but confirmed the assessment by fluorescence for overall cleanliness (CI95 1 - 14, P = 0.018).

Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that a two-step intervention significantly improves cleaning in a busy ED.

评估和提升急诊科的清洁度题目:提升急诊科的清洁度。
目的:提高拥挤急诊科(ED)病房的清洁和消毒水平。环境:三级转诊医院。设计:前瞻性、三组分、干预前后研究。方法:第一阶段包括为期4周的ED病房清洁度基线测定,采用两种方法:(1)荧光喷雾,在清洁前使用,随后使用紫外线灯评估。结果用去除斑点/所有斑点的百分比表示(≥7/10个清洁斑点/房间被认为是干净的;(2)清洗后获得的ATP拭子,用于检测是否存在残留的有机物质;读数结果:与基线相比,在研究的所有三个阶段清洁前后均可进行荧光检测的79个病房的清洁度从50%±35个斑点/所有斑点的基线值增加到第一次干预后的61%±36 (CI95 -0.6 - 21, P = 0.54)和第二次干预后的68%±35 (CI95 - 31, P = 0.004)。亚分析显示,从基线到第二和第三阶段,夜班的改善最为显著,分别从47%±32 (n = 45)、60%±33 (n = 49)到76%±29 (n = 29) (P = 0.001)。ATP检测对洁净度评价的敏感性较低,但荧光检测对整体洁净度评价的敏感性较低(CI95 1 ~ 14, P = 0.018)。结论:我们的数据表明,两步干预显著改善了繁忙急诊科的清洁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信