Evaluation of a New Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Sickle Cell Disease Newborn Screening.

IF 4 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Céline Renoux, Estelle Roland, Séverine Ruet, Sarah Zouaghi, Marie Michel, Philippe Joly, Cécile Feray, Fanny Zhao, Déborah Gavanier, Pascal Gaucherand, Fanny Roumieu, Giovanna Cannas, Salima Merazga, Philippe Connes, Gilles Renom, Jérôme Massardier, David Cheillan
{"title":"Evaluation of a New Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Sickle Cell Disease Newborn Screening.","authors":"Céline Renoux, Estelle Roland, Séverine Ruet, Sarah Zouaghi, Marie Michel, Philippe Joly, Cécile Feray, Fanny Zhao, Déborah Gavanier, Pascal Gaucherand, Fanny Roumieu, Giovanna Cannas, Salima Merazga, Philippe Connes, Gilles Renom, Jérôme Massardier, David Cheillan","doi":"10.3390/ijns10040077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In France, sickle cell disease newborn screening (SCD NBS) has been targeted to at-risk regions since 1984, but generalization to the whole population will be implemented from November 2024. Although tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is already used for the NBS of several inherited metabolic diseases, its application for SCD NBS has not been widely adopted worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate a dedicated MS/MS kit (Targeted MS/MS Hemo, ZenTech, LaCAR Company, Liege, Belgium) for SCD NBS and to compare the results obtained with those from an NBS reference center using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) and cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (CE-HPLC, Variant NBS, Biorad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) as confirmatory method. The MS/MS Hemo kit was used according to the manufacturer's instructions and performed on a Waters Xevo TQ-D (Waters Corporation, USA). The software provided by the manufacturer was used for the calculation and analysis of peptide signal ratios. Among the 1333 samples, the results of 1324 samples were consistent with the HPLC and/or MALDI-TOF results (1263 FA, 50 FAS, 7 FAC, 1 FAO-Arab, and 3 FS). All the discordant results (one FAS on MS/MS vs. FA in CE-HPLC, one FA on MS/MS vs. FAS in CE-HPLC, seven FS on MS/MS vs. FAS in CE-HPLC) were corrected after modifying the peptide signal ratios thresholds, allowing the MS/MS Hemo kit to achieve near-100% sensitivity and specificity for SCD NBS. In conclusion, the MS/MS Hemo kit appears to be an effective method for SCD NBS, particularly for laboratories already equipped with MS/MS technology. However, these results should be confirmed in a larger cohort including a greater number of positive samples for SCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14159,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11676960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neonatal Screening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10040077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In France, sickle cell disease newborn screening (SCD NBS) has been targeted to at-risk regions since 1984, but generalization to the whole population will be implemented from November 2024. Although tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is already used for the NBS of several inherited metabolic diseases, its application for SCD NBS has not been widely adopted worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate a dedicated MS/MS kit (Targeted MS/MS Hemo, ZenTech, LaCAR Company, Liege, Belgium) for SCD NBS and to compare the results obtained with those from an NBS reference center using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) and cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (CE-HPLC, Variant NBS, Biorad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) as confirmatory method. The MS/MS Hemo kit was used according to the manufacturer's instructions and performed on a Waters Xevo TQ-D (Waters Corporation, USA). The software provided by the manufacturer was used for the calculation and analysis of peptide signal ratios. Among the 1333 samples, the results of 1324 samples were consistent with the HPLC and/or MALDI-TOF results (1263 FA, 50 FAS, 7 FAC, 1 FAO-Arab, and 3 FS). All the discordant results (one FAS on MS/MS vs. FA in CE-HPLC, one FA on MS/MS vs. FAS in CE-HPLC, seven FS on MS/MS vs. FAS in CE-HPLC) were corrected after modifying the peptide signal ratios thresholds, allowing the MS/MS Hemo kit to achieve near-100% sensitivity and specificity for SCD NBS. In conclusion, the MS/MS Hemo kit appears to be an effective method for SCD NBS, particularly for laboratories already equipped with MS/MS technology. However, these results should be confirmed in a larger cohort including a greater number of positive samples for SCD.

一种新的串联质谱法用于新生儿镰状细胞病筛查的评价。
在法国,镰状细胞病新生儿筛查(SCD NBS)自1984年以来一直针对高危地区,但将从2024年11月起推广到全体人口。虽然串联质谱法(MS/MS)已用于几种遗传性代谢疾病的NBS,但其在SCD NBS中的应用尚未在世界范围内得到广泛应用。本研究的目的是评估用于SCD NBS的专用MS/MS试剂盒(Targeted MS/MS Hemo, ZenTech, LaCAR Company, Liege, Belgium),并将使用基质辅助激光脱附/电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)和阳离子交换高效液相色谱(CE-HPLC, Variant NBS, Biorad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA)作为验证方法获得的结果与NBS参考中心的结果进行比较。根据制造商说明使用MS/MS Hemo试剂盒,并在Waters Xevo TQ-D (Waters Corporation, USA)上进行检测。使用厂家提供的软件进行肽信号比的计算和分析。1333个样品中,1324个样品与HPLC和/或MALDI-TOF结果一致(1263个FA, 50个FAS, 7个FAC, 1个FAO-Arab, 3个FS)。所有不一致的结果(1个FAS在MS/MS vs. FA在CE-HPLC中,1个FA在MS/MS vs. FAS在CE-HPLC中,7个FS在MS/MS vs. FAS在CE-HPLC中)在修改肽信号比率阈值后得到纠正,使MS/MS Hemo试剂盒对SCD NBS的敏感性和特异性接近100%。总之,MS/MS Hemo试剂盒似乎是SCD NBS的有效方法,特别是对于已经配备MS/MS技术的实验室。然而,这些结果应该在更大的队列中得到证实,其中包括更多的SCD阳性样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
International Journal of Neonatal Screening Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信