'Making abortion safe': abortion and post-abortion care providers' experiences of stigma in Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Sierra Leone and Nigeria.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Suzanna Bright, Emma Parnham, Rebecca Blaylock, Louise Bury, Friday Okonofua, Sunhurai Mukwambo, Munyaradzi Nyakanda, Theodomir Sebazungu, Godwin Akaba, Lesley Hoggart
{"title":"'Making abortion safe': abortion and post-abortion care providers' experiences of stigma in Rwanda, Zimbabwe, Sierra Leone and Nigeria.","authors":"Suzanna Bright, Emma Parnham, Rebecca Blaylock, Louise Bury, Friday Okonofua, Sunhurai Mukwambo, Munyaradzi Nyakanda, Theodomir Sebazungu, Godwin Akaba, Lesley Hoggart","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social stigma and the marginalisation of abortion care within medical settings can negatively affect abortion providers. While some research has evaluated stigma interventions in legally restrictive settings, little work has explored the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing abortion and post-abortion care (PAC) outside the USA. This study, part of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' 'Making Abortion Safe' programme, aimed to understand providers' experiences of abortion stigma in four African countries with restrictive legislation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In-depth interviews with 44 abortion and PAC providers were conducted in Nigeria, Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes emerged: personal and professional effects of stigma, multiple manifestations of stigma, driving forces of stigma, and positivity and resilience. Stigma affects providers' professional identity, community belonging and relationships. Restrictive legal frameworks are the main driver of abortion stigma, operating at multiple levels that reinforce each other. The legal status of abortion labels it as 'dirty work', conflicting with healthcare principles. Judgmental attitudes from other HCPs negatively impact providers' well-being and care quality. However, providers showed resilience through professional and personal commitment, and the belief in 'doing the right thing' helped them resist stigma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Legal changes are crucial for increasing access and reducing stigma among the workforce. In these countries, providers face challenges in offering legal healthcare. Organisational interventions are needed to address stigmatising values and create positive workplaces. Ongoing support is essential for HCPs to remain resilient against abortion stigma, helping to normalise abortion care and those who provide it.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2024-202495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social stigma and the marginalisation of abortion care within medical settings can negatively affect abortion providers. While some research has evaluated stigma interventions in legally restrictive settings, little work has explored the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) providing abortion and post-abortion care (PAC) outside the USA. This study, part of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' 'Making Abortion Safe' programme, aimed to understand providers' experiences of abortion stigma in four African countries with restrictive legislation.

Methods: In-depth interviews with 44 abortion and PAC providers were conducted in Nigeria, Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe.

Results: Four themes emerged: personal and professional effects of stigma, multiple manifestations of stigma, driving forces of stigma, and positivity and resilience. Stigma affects providers' professional identity, community belonging and relationships. Restrictive legal frameworks are the main driver of abortion stigma, operating at multiple levels that reinforce each other. The legal status of abortion labels it as 'dirty work', conflicting with healthcare principles. Judgmental attitudes from other HCPs negatively impact providers' well-being and care quality. However, providers showed resilience through professional and personal commitment, and the belief in 'doing the right thing' helped them resist stigma.

Conclusions: Legal changes are crucial for increasing access and reducing stigma among the workforce. In these countries, providers face challenges in offering legal healthcare. Organisational interventions are needed to address stigmatising values and create positive workplaces. Ongoing support is essential for HCPs to remain resilient against abortion stigma, helping to normalise abortion care and those who provide it.

“使堕胎安全”:卢旺达、津巴布韦、塞拉利昂和尼日利亚堕胎和堕胎后护理提供者的耻辱经历。
背景:医疗环境中堕胎护理的社会耻辱和边缘化会对堕胎提供者产生负面影响。虽然一些研究已经评估了在法律限制的设置污名干预,很少有工作探索医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)提供堕胎和堕胎后护理(PAC)在美国以外的经验。这项研究是皇家妇产科学院“使堕胎安全”项目的一部分,旨在了解在四个有限制性立法的非洲国家,提供者对堕胎耻辱的经历。方法:对尼日利亚、卢旺达、塞拉利昂和津巴布韦的44名堕胎和PAC提供者进行深度访谈。结果:出现了四个主题:耻辱感的个人和职业影响、耻辱感的多种表现、耻辱感的驱动力、积极性和弹性。污名会影响医疗服务提供者的职业认同、社区归属感和人际关系。限制性法律框架是堕胎耻辱的主要驱动因素,在多个层面上相互加强。堕胎的法律地位给它贴上了“肮脏的工作”的标签,与医疗保健原则相冲突。其他卫生保健提供者的判断态度对提供者的福祉和护理质量产生负面影响。然而,医疗服务提供者通过专业和个人承诺表现出了韧性,“做正确的事”的信念帮助他们抵制了污名。结论:法律变革对于增加劳动力获取和减少耻辱感至关重要。在这些国家,医疗服务提供者在提供合法医疗服务方面面临挑战。需要组织干预来解决污名化的价值观并创造积极的工作场所。持续的支持对于医护人员保持对堕胎污名的抵抗力至关重要,有助于使堕胎护理和提供堕胎服务的人正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信