Comparison of three different cystatin C measurement procedures in a pediatric chronic kidney disease cohort: Calibration for longitudinal measurements and implications for clinical estimation of GFR.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Derek K Ng, George J Schwartz, Bradley A Warady, Susan L Furth, Jesse C Seegmiller
{"title":"Comparison of three different cystatin C measurement procedures in a pediatric chronic kidney disease cohort: Calibration for longitudinal measurements and implications for clinical estimation of GFR.","authors":"Derek K Ng, George J Schwartz, Bradley A Warady, Susan L Furth, Jesse C Seegmiller","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Serum cystatin C (CysC) is used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), including in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Under 25 years (U25eGFR) equations. Several CysC measurement procedures available from diagnostic vendors include reference material for calibration, but the extent of heterogeneity across manufacturers is unclear. Since heterogeneity may have clinical and research implications for eGFR, we evaluated three CysC procedures in samples from the CKiD study representing a wide spectrum of kidney function.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The three CysC measurement procedures evaluated were: Siemens BN II N Latex CystatinC Assay; Gentian CystatinC Immunoassay; and Roche Tina-quant CystatinC Gen.2. Bland-Altman quantified agreement with Siemens as reference because that method was used for longitudinal CKiD samples from 2003 to 2023. We present derivation of the interquartile range (IQR) of U25eGFR as a measure of precision and describe differences outside this range.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 53 samples from 44 participants, Gentian measurements were 7 % higher than Siemens (95 %CI: +5.6 %,+8.5 %), while Roche measurements were 4.8 % lower on average (95 %CI: -6.2 %,-3.3 %). Both had very high correlation: 0.9926 and 0.9906, respectively. There was strong agreement across procedures, but a simple correction factor of 7 % reduction applied to Gentian yielded unbiased estimates (+0.03 %, 95 %CI: -1.3 %,+1.4 %) and strong performance in Deming regression. For precision, 98 % of U25eGFR values based on Gentian and Roche CysC were each within the IQR of the Siemens-based estimates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite reference material calibration, heterogeneity across CysC measurement procedures was observed. Procedure variability was within the limits of U25eGFR estimates indicating that practically, all procedures are appropriate for clinical use. Clinicians may consider calculating IQR of U25eGFR estimates for pediatric chronic kidney disease management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"110869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2024.110869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Serum cystatin C (CysC) is used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), including in the Chronic Kidney Disease in Children (CKiD) Under 25 years (U25eGFR) equations. Several CysC measurement procedures available from diagnostic vendors include reference material for calibration, but the extent of heterogeneity across manufacturers is unclear. Since heterogeneity may have clinical and research implications for eGFR, we evaluated three CysC procedures in samples from the CKiD study representing a wide spectrum of kidney function.

Materials and methods: The three CysC measurement procedures evaluated were: Siemens BN II N Latex CystatinC Assay; Gentian CystatinC Immunoassay; and Roche Tina-quant CystatinC Gen.2. Bland-Altman quantified agreement with Siemens as reference because that method was used for longitudinal CKiD samples from 2003 to 2023. We present derivation of the interquartile range (IQR) of U25eGFR as a measure of precision and describe differences outside this range.

Results: From 53 samples from 44 participants, Gentian measurements were 7 % higher than Siemens (95 %CI: +5.6 %,+8.5 %), while Roche measurements were 4.8 % lower on average (95 %CI: -6.2 %,-3.3 %). Both had very high correlation: 0.9926 and 0.9906, respectively. There was strong agreement across procedures, but a simple correction factor of 7 % reduction applied to Gentian yielded unbiased estimates (+0.03 %, 95 %CI: -1.3 %,+1.4 %) and strong performance in Deming regression. For precision, 98 % of U25eGFR values based on Gentian and Roche CysC were each within the IQR of the Siemens-based estimates.

Conclusions: Despite reference material calibration, heterogeneity across CysC measurement procedures was observed. Procedure variability was within the limits of U25eGFR estimates indicating that practically, all procedures are appropriate for clinical use. Clinicians may consider calculating IQR of U25eGFR estimates for pediatric chronic kidney disease management.

儿童慢性肾病队列中三种不同胱抑素C测量方法的比较:纵向测量的校准及其对GFR临床估计的影响
血清胱抑素C (CysC)用于估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR),包括在25岁以下儿童慢性肾病(CKiD) 年(U25eGFR)方程中。诊断供应商提供的几种CysC测量程序包括用于校准的参考材料,但各制造商之间的异质性程度尚不清楚。由于异质性可能对eGFR具有临床和研究意义,我们评估了CKiD研究样本中的三种CysC程序,代表了广泛的肾功能。材料和方法:评估的三种CysC测量方法为:Siemens BN II N Latex CystatinC Assay;龙胆CystatinC免疫测定;和罗氏Tina-quant CystatinC Gen.2。Bland-Altman量化了Siemens的一致性作为参考,因为该方法用于2003年至2023年的纵向CKiD样本。我们提出了U25eGFR的四分位数范围(IQR)的推导,作为精度的度量,并描述了该范围之外的差异。结果:在44名参与者的53份样本中,龙胆草的测量值比西门子高7 %(95 %CI: +5.6 %,+8.5 %),而罗氏的测量值平均低4.8 %(95 %CI: -6.2 %,-3.3 %)。两者的相关性都非常高,分别为0.9926和0.9906。在整个过程中有很强的一致性,但对龙胆草进行简单的校正因子7 %的减少产生了无偏估计(+0.03 %,95 %CI: -1.3 %,+1.4 %),并且在Deming回归中表现良好。为了精确起见,98 %基于龙胆草和罗氏CysC的U25eGFR值都在基于西门子的估计的IQR内。结论:尽管进行了标准物质校准,但在CysC测量过程中观察到异质性。手术的可变性在U25eGFR估计的范围内,这表明实际上,所有手术都适合临床使用。临床医生可以考虑计算IQR的U25eGFR估计儿童慢性肾脏疾病的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical biochemistry
Clinical biochemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信