Joseph William McSoley, David Winthrop Buck, Abby V Winterberg
{"title":"Changing the culture: increasing captured intraoperative anaesthesia-related safety events through targeted interventions.","authors":"Joseph William McSoley, David Winthrop Buck, Abby V Winterberg","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.<sup>10</sup> Incident-capturing systems (ICSs) are essential for patient safety monitoring, identifying risks and ongoing opportunities for improvement. After a literature review and assessment of our current ICSs, we concluded that our institution lacked a reliable anaesthesia-specific ICS system, leading to under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quality improvement initiative to help increase perioperative safety event reporting by anaesthesiologists, fellows and certified registered nurse anaesthetists. We analysed all anaesthesia-related perioperative safety events from July 2019 to December 2020 to determine a baseline rate of safety events captured. We conducted a simplified failure-mode effects analysis and designed a key driver diagram to guide our initiative. Based on these, we designed and implemented seven interventions aimed at increasing anaesthesia-related perioperative safety event reporting. We then reviewed perioperative safety events captured from January 2021 to February 2023 and compared the safety event capture rate to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 10 months, we trialled and implemented multiple interventions aimed at increasing perioperative anaesthesia-related safety event capture, including re-education, strategic placement of report forms, education of anaesthesia and non-anaesthesia personnel, celebration of events captured, promotion of a safe-capture culture where reporting was not seen as punitive and the transition to an online anaesthesia ICS. Over 25 months, we demonstrated a sustained increase in event reporting from a baseline of 1.9 incidents captured per week (average of 1000 cases performed weekly) to 19 events captured per week postinterventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing event reporting required a multifaceted approach-ongoing attention to reporting barriers and developing targeted interventions promoting sustained reporting. Education on the importance of reporting, creating a reliable electronic ICS, creating a non-punitive culture and continuing to promote a safety culture contributed to system improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is an under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.10 Incident-capturing systems (ICSs) are essential for patient safety monitoring, identifying risks and ongoing opportunities for improvement. After a literature review and assessment of our current ICSs, we concluded that our institution lacked a reliable anaesthesia-specific ICS system, leading to under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.
Methods: We conducted a quality improvement initiative to help increase perioperative safety event reporting by anaesthesiologists, fellows and certified registered nurse anaesthetists. We analysed all anaesthesia-related perioperative safety events from July 2019 to December 2020 to determine a baseline rate of safety events captured. We conducted a simplified failure-mode effects analysis and designed a key driver diagram to guide our initiative. Based on these, we designed and implemented seven interventions aimed at increasing anaesthesia-related perioperative safety event reporting. We then reviewed perioperative safety events captured from January 2021 to February 2023 and compared the safety event capture rate to baseline.
Results: Over 10 months, we trialled and implemented multiple interventions aimed at increasing perioperative anaesthesia-related safety event capture, including re-education, strategic placement of report forms, education of anaesthesia and non-anaesthesia personnel, celebration of events captured, promotion of a safe-capture culture where reporting was not seen as punitive and the transition to an online anaesthesia ICS. Over 25 months, we demonstrated a sustained increase in event reporting from a baseline of 1.9 incidents captured per week (average of 1000 cases performed weekly) to 19 events captured per week postinterventions.
Conclusions: Increasing event reporting required a multifaceted approach-ongoing attention to reporting barriers and developing targeted interventions promoting sustained reporting. Education on the importance of reporting, creating a reliable electronic ICS, creating a non-punitive culture and continuing to promote a safety culture contributed to system improvement.