Changing the culture: increasing captured intraoperative anaesthesia-related safety events through targeted interventions.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Joseph William McSoley, David Winthrop Buck, Abby V Winterberg
{"title":"Changing the culture: increasing captured intraoperative anaesthesia-related safety events through targeted interventions.","authors":"Joseph William McSoley, David Winthrop Buck, Abby V Winterberg","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.<sup>10</sup> Incident-capturing systems (ICSs) are essential for patient safety monitoring, identifying risks and ongoing opportunities for improvement. After a literature review and assessment of our current ICSs, we concluded that our institution lacked a reliable anaesthesia-specific ICS system, leading to under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quality improvement initiative to help increase perioperative safety event reporting by anaesthesiologists, fellows and certified registered nurse anaesthetists. We analysed all anaesthesia-related perioperative safety events from July 2019 to December 2020 to determine a baseline rate of safety events captured. We conducted a simplified failure-mode effects analysis and designed a key driver diagram to guide our initiative. Based on these, we designed and implemented seven interventions aimed at increasing anaesthesia-related perioperative safety event reporting. We then reviewed perioperative safety events captured from January 2021 to February 2023 and compared the safety event capture rate to baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 10 months, we trialled and implemented multiple interventions aimed at increasing perioperative anaesthesia-related safety event capture, including re-education, strategic placement of report forms, education of anaesthesia and non-anaesthesia personnel, celebration of events captured, promotion of a safe-capture culture where reporting was not seen as punitive and the transition to an online anaesthesia ICS. Over 25 months, we demonstrated a sustained increase in event reporting from a baseline of 1.9 incidents captured per week (average of 1000 cases performed weekly) to 19 events captured per week postinterventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increasing event reporting required a multifaceted approach-ongoing attention to reporting barriers and developing targeted interventions promoting sustained reporting. Education on the importance of reporting, creating a reliable electronic ICS, creating a non-punitive culture and continuing to promote a safety culture contributed to system improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.10 Incident-capturing systems (ICSs) are essential for patient safety monitoring, identifying risks and ongoing opportunities for improvement. After a literature review and assessment of our current ICSs, we concluded that our institution lacked a reliable anaesthesia-specific ICS system, leading to under-reporting of anaesthesia-related safety events.

Methods: We conducted a quality improvement initiative to help increase perioperative safety event reporting by anaesthesiologists, fellows and certified registered nurse anaesthetists. We analysed all anaesthesia-related perioperative safety events from July 2019 to December 2020 to determine a baseline rate of safety events captured. We conducted a simplified failure-mode effects analysis and designed a key driver diagram to guide our initiative. Based on these, we designed and implemented seven interventions aimed at increasing anaesthesia-related perioperative safety event reporting. We then reviewed perioperative safety events captured from January 2021 to February 2023 and compared the safety event capture rate to baseline.

Results: Over 10 months, we trialled and implemented multiple interventions aimed at increasing perioperative anaesthesia-related safety event capture, including re-education, strategic placement of report forms, education of anaesthesia and non-anaesthesia personnel, celebration of events captured, promotion of a safe-capture culture where reporting was not seen as punitive and the transition to an online anaesthesia ICS. Over 25 months, we demonstrated a sustained increase in event reporting from a baseline of 1.9 incidents captured per week (average of 1000 cases performed weekly) to 19 events captured per week postinterventions.

Conclusions: Increasing event reporting required a multifaceted approach-ongoing attention to reporting barriers and developing targeted interventions promoting sustained reporting. Education on the importance of reporting, creating a reliable electronic ICS, creating a non-punitive culture and continuing to promote a safety culture contributed to system improvement.

改变文化:通过有针对性的干预增加术中麻醉相关安全事件的记录。
背景:麻醉相关安全事件的报道不足事件捕捉系统(ics)对于患者安全监测、识别风险和持续改进机会至关重要。在对我们目前的ICS进行文献回顾和评估后,我们得出结论,我们的机构缺乏可靠的麻醉专用ICS系统,导致麻醉相关安全事件的报告不足。方法:我们开展了一项质量改进计划,以帮助增加麻醉医师、研究员和注册麻醉师护士的围手术期安全事件报告。我们分析了2019年7月至2020年12月期间所有与麻醉相关的围手术期安全事件,以确定捕获的安全事件的基线率。我们进行了一个简化的失效模式效应分析,并设计了一个关键的驱动图来指导我们的计划。在此基础上,我们设计并实施了七种干预措施,旨在增加麻醉相关围手术期安全事件的报告。然后,我们回顾了从2021年1月到2023年2月捕获的围手术期安全事件,并将安全事件捕获率与基线进行了比较。结果:在10个多月的时间里,我们试验并实施了多种干预措施,旨在增加围手术期麻醉相关的安全事件捕获,包括再教育、报告表的战略性放置、对麻醉和非麻醉人员的教育、对捕获事件的庆祝、促进安全捕获文化(报告不被视为惩罚性)以及向在线麻醉ICS的过渡。在25个月的时间里,我们证明了事件报告的持续增加,从每周捕获1.9个事件的基线(平均每周处理1000个病例)到干预后每周捕获的19个事件。结论:增加事件报告需要多方面的方法——持续关注报告障碍,制定有针对性的干预措施,促进持续报告。有关报告重要性的教育、建立可靠的电子信息系统、建立非惩罚性文化和继续促进安全文化有助于系统改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信