Surgical Morbidity following Planned Hysterectomy versus Conservative Management for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Itamar D Futterman, Cintia Gomes, Olivia Sher, Julia Fisher, Rodney A McLaren, Shoshana Haberman, Scott Chudnoff
{"title":"Surgical Morbidity following Planned Hysterectomy versus Conservative Management for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Itamar D Futterman, Cintia Gomes, Olivia Sher, Julia Fisher, Rodney A McLaren, Shoshana Haberman, Scott Chudnoff","doi":"10.1055/a-2491-4328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> In recent years, the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management to preserve fertility. However, optimal management remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the two to evaluate which approach was associated with lower surgical morbidity.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 31, 2023, for trials comparing conservative management versus planned hysterectomy. We included all prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized control studies that reported outcomes related to surgical morbidity in cases of PAS. Surgical morbidity was defined as rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)/coagulopathy, bladder injury, number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, estimated blood loss (EBL), and maternal mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Odds ratios (ORs) were computed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed or random effects model. Among 839 studies initially retrieved, 12 were included with a total of 1,167 patients. Of these, 669 (57.3%) underwent conservative management and 498 (42.7%) underwent a planned hysterectomy. Conservative management resulted in lower rates of ICU admission (OR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.35), lower rates of bladder injury (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.48), lower incidence of DIC or coagulopathy (OR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.48), lower mean difference EBL (-1,292.81 mL; 95% CI: -1,922.16 to -593.46), as well as lower number of PRBC units transfused (-1.54 units; 95% CI: -2.29 to -0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Our findings suggest that conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· management of PAS has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management.. · Optimal management for PAS remains unclear.. · conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2491-4328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  In recent years, the management of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management to preserve fertility. However, optimal management remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the two to evaluate which approach was associated with lower surgical morbidity.

Study design:  MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to July 31, 2023, for trials comparing conservative management versus planned hysterectomy. We included all prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, and randomized control studies that reported outcomes related to surgical morbidity in cases of PAS. Surgical morbidity was defined as rates of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)/coagulopathy, bladder injury, number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused, estimated blood loss (EBL), and maternal mortality.

Results:  Odds ratios (ORs) were computed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a fixed or random effects model. Among 839 studies initially retrieved, 12 were included with a total of 1,167 patients. Of these, 669 (57.3%) underwent conservative management and 498 (42.7%) underwent a planned hysterectomy. Conservative management resulted in lower rates of ICU admission (OR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.35), lower rates of bladder injury (OR = 0.31; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.48), lower incidence of DIC or coagulopathy (OR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.48), lower mean difference EBL (-1,292.81 mL; 95% CI: -1,922.16 to -593.46), as well as lower number of PRBC units transfused (-1.54 units; 95% CI: -2.29 to -0.78).

Conclusion:  Our findings suggest that conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity.

Key points: · management of PAS has fallen into two categories: planned hysterectomy and conservative management.. · Optimal management for PAS remains unclear.. · conservative management of PAS may be associated with reduced surgical morbidity..

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信