Characteristics and outcomes of subarachnoid hemorrhage from vertebral artery dissection: A comparative study with other non-traumatic etiologies

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shu Oshita, Tetsuya Yumoto, Shunta Jinno, Ippei Matsuo, Takashi Hongo, Hiromichi Naito, Masafumi Hiramatsu, Jun Haruma, Kenji Sugiu, Shota Tanaka, Atsunori Nakao
{"title":"Characteristics and outcomes of subarachnoid hemorrhage from vertebral artery dissection: A comparative study with other non-traumatic etiologies","authors":"Shu Oshita,&nbsp;Tetsuya Yumoto,&nbsp;Shunta Jinno,&nbsp;Ippei Matsuo,&nbsp;Takashi Hongo,&nbsp;Hiromichi Naito,&nbsp;Masafumi Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Jun Haruma,&nbsp;Kenji Sugiu,&nbsp;Shota Tanaka,&nbsp;Atsunori Nakao","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is a rare cause of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with significant clinical implications. This study compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SAH from intracranial VAD rupture to those from other etiologies, primarily aneurysmal rupture.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center retrospective cohort study at Okayama University Hospital included patients with non-traumatic SAH diagnosed between 2019 and 2023. Patients were categorized into “VAD rupture” and “other etiologies” groups. The main outcome was clinical presentation and symptoms. Additional outcomes included ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, and unfavorable outcomes at discharge and 6 months, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 3–6.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 66 patients were included, with 14 in the VAD rupture group and 52 in the other etiologies group. The VAD rupture group was younger (median age 49 vs. 64 years, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and had a higher incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (42.9% vs. 9.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Preceding headache was more common in the VAD rupture group (78.6% vs. 11.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), with a median duration of 36 h before presentation. ICU and in-hospital mortality was higher in the VAD rupture group (both 50.0% vs. 19.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.019). No significant differences were found in unfavorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge and 6 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>VAD-related SAH often presents with prodromal headaches, severe symptoms like out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and higher ICU and in-hospital mortality than other SAH causes, though long-term outcomes are similar. Larger, prospective studies are needed to refine interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11671172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is a rare cause of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with significant clinical implications. This study compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of SAH from intracranial VAD rupture to those from other etiologies, primarily aneurysmal rupture.

Methods

This single-center retrospective cohort study at Okayama University Hospital included patients with non-traumatic SAH diagnosed between 2019 and 2023. Patients were categorized into “VAD rupture” and “other etiologies” groups. The main outcome was clinical presentation and symptoms. Additional outcomes included ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, and unfavorable outcomes at discharge and 6 months, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 3–6.

Results

A total of 66 patients were included, with 14 in the VAD rupture group and 52 in the other etiologies group. The VAD rupture group was younger (median age 49 vs. 64 years, p = 0.003) and had a higher incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (42.9% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.011). Preceding headache was more common in the VAD rupture group (78.6% vs. 11.5%, p < 0.001), with a median duration of 36 h before presentation. ICU and in-hospital mortality was higher in the VAD rupture group (both 50.0% vs. 19.3%, p = 0.019). No significant differences were found in unfavorable neurological outcomes at hospital discharge and 6 months.

Conclusions

VAD-related SAH often presents with prodromal headaches, severe symptoms like out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and higher ICU and in-hospital mortality than other SAH causes, though long-term outcomes are similar. Larger, prospective studies are needed to refine interventions.

Abstract Image

椎动脉夹层引起的蛛网膜下腔出血的特点和结局:与其他非创伤性病因的比较研究。
目的:椎动脉夹层(VAD)是一种罕见的非外伤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的原因,具有重要的临床意义。本研究比较了颅内VAD破裂与其他原因(主要是动脉瘤破裂)引起的SAH的临床特征和结果。方法:冈山大学医院的单中心回顾性队列研究纳入了2019年至2023年间诊断的非创伤性SAH患者。患者分为“VAD破裂”组和“其他病因”组。主要结局是临床表现和症状。其他结局包括ICU死亡率、住院死亡率、出院和6个月时的不良结局,定义为修改后的Rankin量表得分为3-6。结果:共纳入66例患者,其中VAD破裂组14例,其他病因组52例。VAD破裂组更年轻(中位年龄49比64岁,p = 0.003),院外心脏骤停发生率更高(42.9%比9.6%,p = 0.011)。VAD破裂组先前的头痛更常见(78.6%比11.5%,p p = 0.019)。出院时和6个月时的不良神经预后无显著差异。结论:与vad相关的SAH通常表现为前体头痛,院外心脏骤停等严重症状,ICU和住院死亡率高于其他SAH原因,尽管长期结局相似。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来完善干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信