POP-REFINE: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating and Optimizing Representativeness in Clinical Trials.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Corey M Benedum, Somnath Sarkar, Selen Bozkurt, Ruma Bhagat, Nicole Richie, Bea Lavery, Sandra D Griffith
{"title":"POP-REFINE: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating and Optimizing Representativeness in Clinical Trials.","authors":"Corey M Benedum, Somnath Sarkar, Selen Bozkurt, Ruma Bhagat, Nicole Richie, Bea Lavery, Sandra D Griffith","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical research has historically failed to include representative levels of historically underrepresented populations and these inequities continue to persist. Ensuring representativeness in clinical trials is crucial for patients to receive clinically appropriate treatment and have equitable access to novel therapies; enhancing the generalizability of study results; and reducing the need for post-marketing commitments focused on underrepresented groups. As demonstrated by recent legislation and guidance documents, regulatory agencies have shown an increased interest in understanding how novel therapies will impact the patient population that will receive them. Despite these efforts, a systematic approach to measure and optimize representativeness remains underdeveloped. Here, we introduce the novel Population Optimization, Representativeness Evaluation, and Fine-tuning Framework, designed to quantify and enhance representativeness. Our framework includes methods for evaluating overall and subgroup representativeness, identifying drivers of non-representativeness, and optimizing eligibility criteria to achieve representative populations. We demonstrate our framework by selecting patients who met the eligibility criteria for nine oncology clinical trials from a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database and quantifying the representativeness of each trial's eligible population. This framework addresses gaps in current literature by providing a comprehensive, data-driven approach to enhance the representativeness of clinical trials, thereby supporting regulatory and internal decision-making processes. This framework is adaptable to various disease indications and can be extended to evaluate enrolled study samples, ensuring that clinical trials are representative.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical research has historically failed to include representative levels of historically underrepresented populations and these inequities continue to persist. Ensuring representativeness in clinical trials is crucial for patients to receive clinically appropriate treatment and have equitable access to novel therapies; enhancing the generalizability of study results; and reducing the need for post-marketing commitments focused on underrepresented groups. As demonstrated by recent legislation and guidance documents, regulatory agencies have shown an increased interest in understanding how novel therapies will impact the patient population that will receive them. Despite these efforts, a systematic approach to measure and optimize representativeness remains underdeveloped. Here, we introduce the novel Population Optimization, Representativeness Evaluation, and Fine-tuning Framework, designed to quantify and enhance representativeness. Our framework includes methods for evaluating overall and subgroup representativeness, identifying drivers of non-representativeness, and optimizing eligibility criteria to achieve representative populations. We demonstrate our framework by selecting patients who met the eligibility criteria for nine oncology clinical trials from a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database and quantifying the representativeness of each trial's eligible population. This framework addresses gaps in current literature by providing a comprehensive, data-driven approach to enhance the representativeness of clinical trials, thereby supporting regulatory and internal decision-making processes. This framework is adaptable to various disease indications and can be extended to evaluate enrolled study samples, ensuring that clinical trials are representative.

POP-REFINE:评估和优化临床试验代表性的综合框架。
临床研究历来未能包括历史上代表性不足的人群的代表性水平,这些不平等现象继续存在。确保临床试验的代表性对患者接受临床适当治疗和公平获得新疗法至关重要;提高研究结果的普遍性;减少对上市后承诺的需求,重点关注代表性不足的群体。正如最近的立法和指导文件所表明的那样,监管机构对了解新疗法将如何影响接受它们的患者群体表现出越来越大的兴趣。尽管做出了这些努力,但衡量和优化代表性的系统方法仍然不发达。在此,我们引入了新的种群优化、代表性评估和微调框架,旨在量化和增强代表性。我们的框架包括评估总体和子群体代表性的方法,确定非代表性的驱动因素,以及优化资格标准以实现代表性人群。我们通过从全国电子健康记录衍生的去识别数据库中选择符合九项肿瘤学临床试验资格标准的患者,并量化每个试验符合条件人群的代表性,来展示我们的框架。该框架通过提供全面的、数据驱动的方法来提高临床试验的代表性,从而支持监管和内部决策过程,从而解决了当前文献中的空白。该框架适用于各种疾病适应症,并可扩展到评估纳入的研究样本,确保临床试验具有代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信