Initial pesticide residue concentrations in nectar and pollen after spray application on flowering plants for assessing impacts on pollination

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Stefan Trapp, Arno Rein, Peter Fantke
{"title":"Initial pesticide residue concentrations in nectar and pollen after spray application on flowering plants for assessing impacts on pollination","authors":"Stefan Trapp,&nbsp;Arno Rein,&nbsp;Peter Fantke","doi":"10.1186/s12302-024-01039-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pesticide application is one of the factors reported to contribute to the decline of pollinators, such as honey bees and bumble bees, and guidelines for risk assessment have been established recently. We collected a total of 1720 data sets of pesticide residue levels in pollen and nectar from EFSA documents and from the scientific literature, covering 71 different chemicals and 20 different crops. Out of this data set, 164 events for nectar with 27 different chemicals and 161 events for pollen with 32 different chemicals were chosen that describe the initial (<i>t</i> = 0–1 day) residue per unit dose (RUD) after spray application. Median RUD values were calculated to describe the typical realistic initial applied dose.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, we can confirm earlier findings found in the frame of risk assessment of plant protection products on bees. RUD pollen is higher than RUD nectar, and there is a wide variability of results. Polar pesticides had higher median RUD values, in particular in nectar, but the explained variability of substance properties is generally small (≤10%). There are clear indications that the setup and the conditions during the experiment override substance-specific differences. Factors contributing to the observed differences in RUD were identified: spray direction (up/sideward &gt; downward), sampling method of nectar and pollen (from flower &gt; by traps &gt; from bees), experimental setting (greenhouse &gt; field or tunnel) and geometry of flowers (Fabaceae had highest RUD nectar).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A goal of the study was to find a prediction method for initial pesticide residues in nectar and pollen after spray application to flowers and plants. Thus, median RUD values for the different conditions were provided. However, nothing can be said about how combinations of the mentioned factors affect RUD values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-024-01039-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-024-01039-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pesticide application is one of the factors reported to contribute to the decline of pollinators, such as honey bees and bumble bees, and guidelines for risk assessment have been established recently. We collected a total of 1720 data sets of pesticide residue levels in pollen and nectar from EFSA documents and from the scientific literature, covering 71 different chemicals and 20 different crops. Out of this data set, 164 events for nectar with 27 different chemicals and 161 events for pollen with 32 different chemicals were chosen that describe the initial (t = 0–1 day) residue per unit dose (RUD) after spray application. Median RUD values were calculated to describe the typical realistic initial applied dose.

Results

Overall, we can confirm earlier findings found in the frame of risk assessment of plant protection products on bees. RUD pollen is higher than RUD nectar, and there is a wide variability of results. Polar pesticides had higher median RUD values, in particular in nectar, but the explained variability of substance properties is generally small (≤10%). There are clear indications that the setup and the conditions during the experiment override substance-specific differences. Factors contributing to the observed differences in RUD were identified: spray direction (up/sideward > downward), sampling method of nectar and pollen (from flower > by traps > from bees), experimental setting (greenhouse > field or tunnel) and geometry of flowers (Fabaceae had highest RUD nectar).

Conclusions

A goal of the study was to find a prediction method for initial pesticide residues in nectar and pollen after spray application to flowers and plants. Thus, median RUD values for the different conditions were provided. However, nothing can be said about how combinations of the mentioned factors affect RUD values.

对开花植物喷施后花蜜和花粉中初始农药残留浓度评价对授粉的影响
据报道,农药的使用是导致蜜蜂和大黄蜂等传粉媒介数量减少的因素之一,最近已经建立了风险评估指南。我们从欧洲食品安全局的文件和科学文献中收集了1720组花粉和花蜜中农药残留水平的数据集,涵盖了71种不同的化学物质和20种不同的作物。在这个数据集中,选择了具有27种不同化学物质的花蜜的164个事件和具有32种不同化学物质的花粉的161个事件,这些事件描述了喷施后单位剂量(RUD)的初始(t = 0-1天)残留。计算中位RUD值来描述典型的实际初始应用剂量。结果从总体上证实了植物保护产品对蜜蜂的风险评估框架中的前期发现。RUD花粉高于RUD花蜜,结果有很大的可变性。极性农药的RUD中值较高,特别是在花蜜中,但物质性质的可解释变异性通常很小(≤10%)。有明确的迹象表明,实验期间的设置和条件覆盖了物质特异性差异。确定了影响RUD差异的因素:喷雾方向(向上/向下)、花蜜和花粉取样方法(用诱捕器采集蜜蜂)、实验环境(温室田野或隧道)和花的几何形状(豆科植物的RUD最高)。结论本研究的目的是建立植物喷施后花蜜和花粉中初始农药残留的预测方法。因此,提供了不同条件下的RUD中值。然而,对于上述因素的组合如何影响RUD值,没有什么可说的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信