Developing Linkages Between PROMIS Physical Function CAT and QuickDASH Scores in Hand Surgery: A Crosswalk Study.

Joshua R Daryoush,Miranda J Rogers,Chong Zhang,Mario J Quesada,Amy M Cizik,Angela P Presson,Nikolas H Kazmers
{"title":"Developing Linkages Between PROMIS Physical Function CAT and QuickDASH Scores in Hand Surgery: A Crosswalk Study.","authors":"Joshua R Daryoush,Miranda J Rogers,Chong Zhang,Mario J Quesada,Amy M Cizik,Angela P Presson,Nikolas H Kazmers","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.23.01400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nThere is no standardization within hand and upper-extremity surgery regarding which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are collected and reported. This limits the ability to compare or combine cohorts that utilize different PROMs. The aim of this study was to develop a linkage model for the QuickDASH (shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and PROMIS PF CAT (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function computerized adaptive testing) instruments to allow interconversion between these PROMs in a hand surgery population.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA retrospective review was conducted to identify adults (≥18 years old) who had completed the QuickDASH and PROMIS PF CAT instruments at the same clinical encounter. Patients with shoulder pathology were excluded. The linear relationship between scores was evaluated with use of the Pearson correlation coefficient. Linking was performed with use of several common methods, and an optimal linkage model was recommended on the basis of a higher R2, strong intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and lower standard error (SE). The recommended model was further evaluated in subgroups based on age (<60 or ≥60 years), sex, etiology for presentation (traumatic versus atraumatic), and treatment type (operative versus nonoperative).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 15,019 patients (mean age, 49 years; 54% female; 86% White) were included. The mean QuickDASH score (and standard deviation) was 37 ± 22, and the mean PROMIS PF CAT score was 45 ± 10. There was a strong negative linear relationship between the QuickDASH and PROMIS PF CAT (r = -0.73). The circle-arc linkage model demonstrated good accuracy and reliability (R2 = 0.55; ICC = 0.71), and crosswalk tables were developed from this model. The subgroup analysis demonstrated age-related bias in the linkage model (root expected mean squared difference, 0.12). To address this, a separate crosswalk table was developed, which was dichotomized by age category.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe QuickDASH and PROMIS PF CAT scores were successfully linked. Utilization of the developed crosswalks-one specific to patients <60 years old and another specific to patients ≥60 years old-will allow for score interconversion in future meta-analyses and multicenter hand surgery studies.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.23.01400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND There is no standardization within hand and upper-extremity surgery regarding which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are collected and reported. This limits the ability to compare or combine cohorts that utilize different PROMs. The aim of this study was to develop a linkage model for the QuickDASH (shortened version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) and PROMIS PF CAT (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function computerized adaptive testing) instruments to allow interconversion between these PROMs in a hand surgery population. METHODS A retrospective review was conducted to identify adults (≥18 years old) who had completed the QuickDASH and PROMIS PF CAT instruments at the same clinical encounter. Patients with shoulder pathology were excluded. The linear relationship between scores was evaluated with use of the Pearson correlation coefficient. Linking was performed with use of several common methods, and an optimal linkage model was recommended on the basis of a higher R2, strong intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and lower standard error (SE). The recommended model was further evaluated in subgroups based on age (<60 or ≥60 years), sex, etiology for presentation (traumatic versus atraumatic), and treatment type (operative versus nonoperative). RESULTS A total of 15,019 patients (mean age, 49 years; 54% female; 86% White) were included. The mean QuickDASH score (and standard deviation) was 37 ± 22, and the mean PROMIS PF CAT score was 45 ± 10. There was a strong negative linear relationship between the QuickDASH and PROMIS PF CAT (r = -0.73). The circle-arc linkage model demonstrated good accuracy and reliability (R2 = 0.55; ICC = 0.71), and crosswalk tables were developed from this model. The subgroup analysis demonstrated age-related bias in the linkage model (root expected mean squared difference, 0.12). To address this, a separate crosswalk table was developed, which was dichotomized by age category. CONCLUSIONS The QuickDASH and PROMIS PF CAT scores were successfully linked. Utilization of the developed crosswalks-one specific to patients <60 years old and another specific to patients ≥60 years old-will allow for score interconversion in future meta-analyses and multicenter hand surgery studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
手外科中PROMIS身体功能CAT和QuickDASH评分之间的联系:一项人行横道研究。
背景:在手部和上肢手术中,关于收集和报告患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)没有标准化。这限制了比较或组合使用不同prom的队列的能力。本研究的目的是为QuickDASH(手臂、肩膀和手的残疾的缩写版本)和PROMIS PF CAT(患者报告的结果测量信息系统物理功能计算机化自适应测试)仪器开发一个联动模型,以便在手外科人群中实现这些PROMs之间的相互转换。方法回顾性分析在同一次临床会面中完成QuickDASH和PROMIS PF CAT仪器的成人(≥18岁)。排除有肩部病变的患者。使用Pearson相关系数评估得分之间的线性关系。使用几种常用的方法进行链接,并以较高的R2、较强的类内相关系数(ICC)和较低的标准误差(SE)为基础推荐了最优链接模型。根据年龄(<60岁或≥60岁)、性别、病因(创伤性与非创伤性)和治疗类型(手术与非手术)进一步评估推荐的模型。结果共15019例患者(平均年龄49岁;54%的女性;86%为白人)。平均QuickDASH评分(及标准差)为37±22分,平均PROMIS PF CAT评分为45±10分。QuickDASH与PROMIS PF CAT呈显著负线性关系(r = -0.73)。圆弧联动模型具有良好的精度和可靠性(R2 = 0.55;ICC = 0.71),并根据该模型编制人行横道表。亚组分析显示连锁模型存在年龄相关偏倚(根期望均方差为0.12)。为了解决这个问题,开发了一个单独的人行横道表,按年龄分类。结论QuickDASH评分与PROMIS PF CAT评分成功衔接。使用已开发的人行横道-一个针对<60岁的患者,另一个针对≥60岁的患者-将允许在未来的meta分析和多中心手外科研究中进行评分转换。证据水平:预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信