Impact of Perampanel for First-Episode Seizures versus Usual Care on Clinical Outcome and Safety Profile Aspects of the Thai Experience.

Journal of epilepsy research Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.14581/jer.24014
Panu Boontoterm, Siraruj Sakoolnamarka, Karanarak Urasyanandana, Pusit Fuengfoo
{"title":"Impact of Perampanel for First-Episode Seizures versus Usual Care on Clinical Outcome and Safety Profile Aspects of the Thai Experience.","authors":"Panu Boontoterm, Siraruj Sakoolnamarka, Karanarak Urasyanandana, Pusit Fuengfoo","doi":"10.14581/jer.24014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Epilepsy increases poor outcomes in patients with post-traumatic brain injury and brain tumor-related epilepsy, for whom early seizure control is essential. Perampanel (PER) was a known third-generation antiepileptic drug for treatment all types of seizures. The objective of the study is to compare clinical outcomes and safety of PER administration as monotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study of all 84 patients assigned to PER monotherapy (PER group, n=36) and other first-line antiepileptic drugs (n=48). Clinical outcomes parameters were measured by the prevalence of patients with a diminish in seizure frequency at 50% in 28 days. From November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2024, comparing the PER group with usual care. Clinical outcomes included adherence rate and seizure-free proportion at 28 days and 6 months. Adverse drug reactions were recorded in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in demographic data and incidence of adverse drug reactions between two groups. Median PER dosage was 4 mg (range, 2-12 mg). Compared to other antiepileptic drugs, the PER group had a prevalence of 50% responder rate at 28 days and 6 months significantly were 75%, 81%, 65%, and 51% respectively. Common adverse drug reactions were somnolence and dizziness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PER administration as monotherapy demonstrated good efficacy and less adverse drug reactions. Low dosages helped to decrease adverse drug reactions and improved retention rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":73741,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epilepsy research","volume":"14 2","pages":"81-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epilepsy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14581/jer.24014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Epilepsy increases poor outcomes in patients with post-traumatic brain injury and brain tumor-related epilepsy, for whom early seizure control is essential. Perampanel (PER) was a known third-generation antiepileptic drug for treatment all types of seizures. The objective of the study is to compare clinical outcomes and safety of PER administration as monotherapy.

Methods: A prospective study of all 84 patients assigned to PER monotherapy (PER group, n=36) and other first-line antiepileptic drugs (n=48). Clinical outcomes parameters were measured by the prevalence of patients with a diminish in seizure frequency at 50% in 28 days. From November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2024, comparing the PER group with usual care. Clinical outcomes included adherence rate and seizure-free proportion at 28 days and 6 months. Adverse drug reactions were recorded in both groups.

Results: There was no difference in demographic data and incidence of adverse drug reactions between two groups. Median PER dosage was 4 mg (range, 2-12 mg). Compared to other antiepileptic drugs, the PER group had a prevalence of 50% responder rate at 28 days and 6 months significantly were 75%, 81%, 65%, and 51% respectively. Common adverse drug reactions were somnolence and dizziness.

Conclusions: PER administration as monotherapy demonstrated good efficacy and less adverse drug reactions. Low dosages helped to decrease adverse drug reactions and improved retention rate.

Perampanel对首发癫痫发作与常规治疗的临床结果和泰国经验的安全性的影响。
背景和目的:癫痫增加了创伤后脑损伤和脑肿瘤相关癫痫患者的不良预后,对这些患者来说,早期癫痫发作控制至关重要。Perampanel (PER)是已知的第三代抗癫痫药物,可治疗所有类型的癫痫发作。该研究的目的是比较PER作为单药治疗的临床结果和安全性。方法:84例患者采用PER单药治疗(PER组,n=36)和其他一线抗癫痫药物治疗(n=48)进行前瞻性研究。临床结果参数通过28天内癫痫发作频率减少50%的患者患病率来测量。从2020年11月1日至2024年4月30日,PER组与常规护理组的比较。临床结果包括依从率和28天和6个月无癫痫发作比例。两组均记录药物不良反应。结果:两组患者人口学资料及药物不良反应发生率无差异。PER中位剂量为4mg(范围2- 12mg)。与其他抗癫痫药物相比,PER组28天和6个月的患病率为50%,分别为75%、81%、65%和51%。常见的药物不良反应为嗜睡和头晕。结论:单药给药效果好,药物不良反应少。低剂量有助于减少药物不良反应,提高保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信