Integration of Peer Navigators Into Longitudinal Research.

IF 1.8 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.008

Carla M Bann, Jamie E Newman, Leslie Clarke, Sandra Russell, Megan Dhawan, Traci Beiersdorfer, Sara DeMauro, Deanne Wilson-Costello, Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, Stephanie Merhar

{"title":"Integration of Peer Navigators Into Longitudinal Research.","authors":"Carla M Bann, Jamie E Newman, Leslie Clarke, Sandra Russell, Megan Dhawan, Traci Beiersdorfer, Sara DeMauro, Deanne Wilson-Costello, Myriam Peralta-Carcelen, Stephanie Merhar","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess consent rates and reasons for refusing consent after the introduction of peer navigators into the Outcomes of Babies With Opioid Exposure (OBOE) Study.Design: Secondary analysis of data from the OBOE Study, a multisite observational study.Setting: Medical centers in Alabama, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (N = 4).Participants: Data about the use of peer navigators were obtained from the primary study, including 1,255 mothers or caregivers who were approached regarding participation in the study.Methods: We used χ2 tests to compare study consent rates and reasons for refusing consent before and after the use of peer navigators.Results: Following the addition of peer navigators, study consent rates significantly improved (29% of 852 before vs. 38% of 403 after; p = .001), and the percentage of potential participants who indicated that they were not interested in sharing information for research significantly decreased (41% of 247 vs. 26% of 115; p = .005).Conclusion: We demonstrate the potential effect of peer navigators on consent and interest in sharing information for research in a longitudinal research study. We recommend the inclusion of peer navigators in studies with high-risk populations.","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2024.11.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess consent rates and reasons for refusing consent after the introduction of peer navigators into the Outcomes of Babies With Opioid Exposure (OBOE) Study.

Design: Secondary analysis of data from the OBOE Study, a multisite observational study.

Setting: Medical centers in Alabama, Ohio, and Pennsylvania (N = 4).

Participants: Data about the use of peer navigators were obtained from the primary study, including 1,255 mothers or caregivers who were approached regarding participation in the study.

Methods: We used χ² tests to compare study consent rates and reasons for refusing consent before and after the use of peer navigators.

Results: Following the addition of peer navigators, study consent rates significantly improved (29% of 852 before vs. 38% of 403 after; p = .001), and the percentage of potential participants who indicated that they were not interested in sharing information for research significantly decreased (41% of 247 vs. 26% of 115; p = .005).

Conclusion: We demonstrate the potential effect of peer navigators on consent and interest in sharing information for research in a longitudinal research study. We recommend the inclusion of peer navigators in studies with high-risk populations.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 医学-妇产科学

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

5.60%

发文量

审稿时长

43 days

期刊介绍： JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.