Prioritizing cases from a multi-institutional cohort for a dataset of pathologist annotations.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Pathology Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100411
Victor Garcia, Emma Gardecki, Stephanie Jou, Xiaoxian Li, Kenneth R Shroyer, Joel Saltz, Balazs Acs, Katherine Elfer, Jochen Lennerz, Roberto Salgado, Brandon D Gallas
{"title":"Prioritizing cases from a multi-institutional cohort for a dataset of pathologist annotations.","authors":"Victor Garcia, Emma Gardecki, Stephanie Jou, Xiaoxian Li, Kenneth R Shroyer, Joel Saltz, Balazs Acs, Katherine Elfer, Jochen Lennerz, Roberto Salgado, Brandon D Gallas","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>With the increasing energy surrounding the development of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models, the use of the same external validation dataset by various developers allows for a direct comparison of model performance. Through our High Throughput Truthing project, we are creating a validation dataset for AI/ML models trained in the assessment of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We obtained clinical metadata for hematoxylin and eosin-stained glass slides and corresponding scanned whole slide images (WSIs) of TNBC core biopsies from two US academic medical centers. We selected regions of interest (ROIs) from the WSIs to target regions with various tissue morphologies and sTILs densities. Given the selected ROIs, we implemented a hierarchical rank-sort method for case prioritization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 122 glass slides and clinical metadata on 105 unique patients with TNBC. All received cases were female, and the mean age was 63.44 years. 60% of all cases were White patients, and 38.1% were Black or African American. After case prioritization, the skewness of the sTILs density distribution improved from 0.60 to 0.46 with a corresponding increase in the entropy of the sTILs density bins from 1.20 to 1.24. We retained cases with less prevalent metadata elements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This method allows us to prioritize underrepresented subgroups based on important clinical factors. In this manuscript, we discuss how we sourced the clinical metadata, selected ROIs, and developed our approach to prioritizing cases for inclusion in our pivotal study.</p>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"16 ","pages":"100411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: With the increasing energy surrounding the development of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models, the use of the same external validation dataset by various developers allows for a direct comparison of model performance. Through our High Throughput Truthing project, we are creating a validation dataset for AI/ML models trained in the assessment of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Materials and methods: We obtained clinical metadata for hematoxylin and eosin-stained glass slides and corresponding scanned whole slide images (WSIs) of TNBC core biopsies from two US academic medical centers. We selected regions of interest (ROIs) from the WSIs to target regions with various tissue morphologies and sTILs densities. Given the selected ROIs, we implemented a hierarchical rank-sort method for case prioritization.

Results: We received 122 glass slides and clinical metadata on 105 unique patients with TNBC. All received cases were female, and the mean age was 63.44 years. 60% of all cases were White patients, and 38.1% were Black or African American. After case prioritization, the skewness of the sTILs density distribution improved from 0.60 to 0.46 with a corresponding increase in the entropy of the sTILs density bins from 1.20 to 1.24. We retained cases with less prevalent metadata elements.

Conclusion: This method allows us to prioritize underrepresented subgroups based on important clinical factors. In this manuscript, we discuss how we sourced the clinical metadata, selected ROIs, and developed our approach to prioritizing cases for inclusion in our pivotal study.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信