Enhancing human phenotype ontology term extraction through synthetic case reports and embedding-based retrieval: A novel approach for improved biomedical data annotation.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Pathology Informatics Pub Date : 2024-11-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100409
Abdulkadir Albayrak, Yao Xiao, Piyush Mukherjee, Sarah S Barnett, Cherisse A Marcou, Steven N Hart
{"title":"Enhancing human phenotype ontology term extraction through synthetic case reports and embedding-based retrieval: A novel approach for improved biomedical data annotation.","authors":"Abdulkadir Albayrak, Yao Xiao, Piyush Mukherjee, Sarah S Barnett, Cherisse A Marcou, Steven N Hart","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increasing utilization of exome and genome sequencing in clinical and research genetics, accurate and automated extraction of human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms from clinical texts has become imperative. Traditional methods for HPO term extraction, such as PhenoTagger, often face limitations in coverage and precision. In this study, we propose a novel approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic sentences with clinical context, which were semantically encoded into vector embeddings. These embeddings are linked to HPO terms, creating a robust knowledgebase that facilitates precise information retrieval. Our method circumvents the known issue of LLM hallucinations by storing and querying these embeddings within a true database, ensuring accurate context matching without the need for a predictive model. We evaluated the performance of three different embedding models, all of which demonstrated substantial improvements over PhenoTagger. Top recall (sensitivity), precision (positive-predictive value, PPV), and F1 are 0.64, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively, which were 31%, 10%, and 21% better than PhenoTagger. Furthermore, optimal performance was achieved when we combined the best performing embedding model with PhenoTagger (a.k.a. Fused model), resulting in recall (sensitivity), precision (PPV), and F1 values of 0.7, 0.7, and 0.7, respectively, which are 10%, 10%, and 10% better than the best embedding models. Our findings underscore the potential of this integrated approach to enhance the precision and reliability of HPO term extraction, offering a scalable and effective solution for biomedical data annotation.</p>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":"16 ","pages":"100409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing utilization of exome and genome sequencing in clinical and research genetics, accurate and automated extraction of human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms from clinical texts has become imperative. Traditional methods for HPO term extraction, such as PhenoTagger, often face limitations in coverage and precision. In this study, we propose a novel approach that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic sentences with clinical context, which were semantically encoded into vector embeddings. These embeddings are linked to HPO terms, creating a robust knowledgebase that facilitates precise information retrieval. Our method circumvents the known issue of LLM hallucinations by storing and querying these embeddings within a true database, ensuring accurate context matching without the need for a predictive model. We evaluated the performance of three different embedding models, all of which demonstrated substantial improvements over PhenoTagger. Top recall (sensitivity), precision (positive-predictive value, PPV), and F1 are 0.64, 0.64, and 0.64, respectively, which were 31%, 10%, and 21% better than PhenoTagger. Furthermore, optimal performance was achieved when we combined the best performing embedding model with PhenoTagger (a.k.a. Fused model), resulting in recall (sensitivity), precision (PPV), and F1 values of 0.7, 0.7, and 0.7, respectively, which are 10%, 10%, and 10% better than the best embedding models. Our findings underscore the potential of this integrated approach to enhance the precision and reliability of HPO term extraction, offering a scalable and effective solution for biomedical data annotation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信