MedVantage: A Primary Care Model for Populations With High Social and Medical Needs.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Audrey Shawley, Sakshi Sharma, Matthew Jung, John Lim, Liam Kavanagh, Richard Li, Marshall Wadleigh, Amal Nehmeh, G Dodd Denton, Kathy Jo Carstarphen
{"title":"MedVantage: A Primary Care Model for Populations With High Social and Medical Needs.","authors":"Audrey Shawley, Sakshi Sharma, Matthew Jung, John Lim, Liam Kavanagh, Richard Li, Marshall Wadleigh, Amal Nehmeh, G Dodd Denton, Kathy Jo Carstarphen","doi":"10.31486/toj.24.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Despite the substantial expenditures on health care in the United States, persistent underperformance in health system metrics necessitates innovative approaches to address complex patient needs. The MedVantage Clinic in New Orleans, Louisiana, offers a regionally tailored, value-based primary care model targeting patients with high social and medical needs. This study provides an evaluation of the efficacy of the MedVantage Clinic in improving the cost of care and service utilization for this population. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective case-control study using data from electronic health records and claims data from 2017 to 2018. The case group was composed of patients with high social and medical needs who were enrolled in the MedVantage Clinic, and the control group consisted of propensity-matched non-MedVantage Clinic patients. Cost and utilization metrics-including per-member, per-month costs and inpatient length of stay-were analyzed using independent sample <i>t</i> tests and difference-in-difference calculations. <b>Results:</b> The MedVantage Clinic group demonstrated a significant decrease in mean inpatient per-member, per-month cost ($4.20) compared to an increase in the control group ($280.20, <i>P</i>=0.017). Inpatient length of stay decreased by 1.7 days for MedVantage Clinic patients and increased by 8 days for control group patients (<i>P</i>=0.019). Although other metrics showed nonsignificant improvements, the MedVantage Clinic generated a total cost of care mean resource benefit of $305.44 per member, per month compared to the control group (<i>P</i>=0.112), with an estimated annual total benefit of $1,224,648 for 189 patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our findings highlight the potential of the MedVantage Clinic to improve health care costs and utilization for patients with high social and medical needs. Despite the limitations of the study, including study duration and patient selection biases, the MedVantage Clinic demonstrated promise as a scalable model for addressing complex patient needs. Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes and implementation strategies for similar models nationwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"24 4","pages":"248-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11666115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.24.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the substantial expenditures on health care in the United States, persistent underperformance in health system metrics necessitates innovative approaches to address complex patient needs. The MedVantage Clinic in New Orleans, Louisiana, offers a regionally tailored, value-based primary care model targeting patients with high social and medical needs. This study provides an evaluation of the efficacy of the MedVantage Clinic in improving the cost of care and service utilization for this population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study using data from electronic health records and claims data from 2017 to 2018. The case group was composed of patients with high social and medical needs who were enrolled in the MedVantage Clinic, and the control group consisted of propensity-matched non-MedVantage Clinic patients. Cost and utilization metrics-including per-member, per-month costs and inpatient length of stay-were analyzed using independent sample t tests and difference-in-difference calculations. Results: The MedVantage Clinic group demonstrated a significant decrease in mean inpatient per-member, per-month cost ($4.20) compared to an increase in the control group ($280.20, P=0.017). Inpatient length of stay decreased by 1.7 days for MedVantage Clinic patients and increased by 8 days for control group patients (P=0.019). Although other metrics showed nonsignificant improvements, the MedVantage Clinic generated a total cost of care mean resource benefit of $305.44 per member, per month compared to the control group (P=0.112), with an estimated annual total benefit of $1,224,648 for 189 patients. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the potential of the MedVantage Clinic to improve health care costs and utilization for patients with high social and medical needs. Despite the limitations of the study, including study duration and patient selection biases, the MedVantage Clinic demonstrated promise as a scalable model for addressing complex patient needs. Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes and implementation strategies for similar models nationwide.

MedVantage:具有高社会和医疗需求人群的初级保健模式。
背景:尽管美国的医疗保健支出巨大,但卫生系统指标持续表现不佳,需要创新方法来解决复杂的患者需求。位于路易斯安那州新奥尔良的MedVantage诊所,针对具有高社会和医疗需求的患者提供了一种区域定制的、基于价值的初级保健模式。本研究提供了MedVantage诊所在改善该人群的护理成本和服务利用率方面的功效评估。方法:采用2017 - 2018年电子健康记录和理赔数据进行回顾性病例对照研究。病例组由在MedVantage诊所登记的具有高社会和医疗需求的患者组成,对照组由倾向匹配的非MedVantage诊所患者组成。成本和利用率指标——包括每位会员、每月成本和住院时间——使用独立样本t检验和差中之差计算进行了分析。结果:MedVantage Clinic组显示,与对照组(280.20美元,P=0.017)增加相比,每位会员每月平均住院费用(4.20美元)显著降低。MedVantage Clinic组患者住院时间减少1.7天,对照组患者住院时间增加8天(P=0.019)。尽管其他指标没有显示出显著的改善,但与对照组相比,MedVantage诊所产生的总护理成本平均资源效益为每位成员每月305.44美元(P=0.112),估计189名患者的年总效益为1,224,648美元。结论:我们的研究结果强调了MedVantage诊所在提高高社会和医疗需求患者的医疗成本和利用率方面的潜力。尽管该研究存在局限性,包括研究时间和患者选择偏差,但MedVantage诊所展示了作为解决复杂患者需求的可扩展模型的前景。需要进一步的研究来探索类似模式在全国范围内的长期效果和实施策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ochsner Journal
Ochsner Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信