Perspectives of Canadian Plastic Surgeons on the Surgical Management of Pressure Injuries.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Erika Opingari, Romain Laurent, Ho Yee Wan, David L Wallace, Alan D Rogers
{"title":"Perspectives of Canadian Plastic Surgeons on the Surgical Management of Pressure Injuries.","authors":"Erika Opingari, Romain Laurent, Ho Yee Wan, David L Wallace, Alan D Rogers","doi":"10.1177/22925503241308541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Pressure injuries, particularly among patients with spinal cord injuries and the elderly, significantly contribute to morbidity, mortality, and financial sequelae. Surgical interventions, including debridement and flaps, may improve outcomes, especially for stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This survey assesses Canadian plastic surgeons' perspectives and practices regarding the surgical management of these injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A web-based survey was distributed to 405 registered members of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons (CSPS) and remained open for a 6-week period. The 16-question survey explored management practices for pressure injuries and the training associated with resident education. <b>Results:</b> Responses from 129 surgeons (31.8%) were analyzed. Of these, 85% manage stage 3 or 4 pressure injuries, though only 67.5% performed both debridement and flap coverage. The majority believe care should ideally occur in community facilities with plastic surgery coverage rather than being centralized in academic centers, although careful patient selection, perioperative planning, and rehabilitation are critical to justify the surgical investment. Most respondents (83%) agreed that plastic surgery residents should be proficient in both debridement and flap coverage by the end of their training. <b>Conclusion:</b> The survey indicates that most surgeons prefer managing pressure injuries in facilities with adequate plastic surgery support rather than exclusively at academic centers. However, structured management pathways and enhanced training in pressure injury care remain crucial. Future healthcare policy and research should focus on improving care delivery and patient outcomes, ensuring that all facilities involved in this care are equipped with the necessary resources and multidisciplinary expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":20206,"journal":{"name":"Plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"22925503241308541"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503241308541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pressure injuries, particularly among patients with spinal cord injuries and the elderly, significantly contribute to morbidity, mortality, and financial sequelae. Surgical interventions, including debridement and flaps, may improve outcomes, especially for stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This survey assesses Canadian plastic surgeons' perspectives and practices regarding the surgical management of these injuries. Methods: A web-based survey was distributed to 405 registered members of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons (CSPS) and remained open for a 6-week period. The 16-question survey explored management practices for pressure injuries and the training associated with resident education. Results: Responses from 129 surgeons (31.8%) were analyzed. Of these, 85% manage stage 3 or 4 pressure injuries, though only 67.5% performed both debridement and flap coverage. The majority believe care should ideally occur in community facilities with plastic surgery coverage rather than being centralized in academic centers, although careful patient selection, perioperative planning, and rehabilitation are critical to justify the surgical investment. Most respondents (83%) agreed that plastic surgery residents should be proficient in both debridement and flap coverage by the end of their training. Conclusion: The survey indicates that most surgeons prefer managing pressure injuries in facilities with adequate plastic surgery support rather than exclusively at academic centers. However, structured management pathways and enhanced training in pressure injury care remain crucial. Future healthcare policy and research should focus on improving care delivery and patient outcomes, ensuring that all facilities involved in this care are equipped with the necessary resources and multidisciplinary expertise.

加拿大整形外科医生对压伤手术治疗的看法。
压力损伤,特别是脊髓损伤患者和老年人,显著增加了发病率、死亡率和经济后遗症。手术干预,包括清创和皮瓣,可以改善结果,特别是3期和4期压伤。这项调查评估了加拿大整形外科医生的观点和做法,关于这些损伤的外科治疗。方法:对405名加拿大整形外科学会(CSPS)注册会员进行网络调查,调查持续6周。16个问题的调查探讨了压力伤害的管理实践和与住院医师教育相关的培训。结果:对129名外科医生的反馈进行分析,占31.8%。其中,85%的患者处理了3期或4期压伤,但只有67.5%的患者同时进行了清创和皮瓣覆盖。大多数人认为,理想情况下,护理应该在有整形手术覆盖的社区设施中进行,而不是集中在学术中心,尽管仔细的患者选择、围手术期计划和康复是证明手术投资合理性的关键。大多数受访者(83%)同意整形外科住院医师在培训结束时应精通清创和皮瓣覆盖。结论:调查表明,大多数外科医生更倾向于在有足够整形手术支持的设施中处理压力损伤,而不是专门在学术中心。然而,在压力损伤护理中,结构化的管理途径和加强的培训仍然至关重要。未来的医疗保健政策和研究应侧重于改善护理服务和患者的治疗效果,确保所有参与这种护理的机构都配备了必要的资源和多学科专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plastic surgery
Plastic surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Plastic Surgery (Chirurgie Plastique) is the official journal of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Group for the Advancement of Microsurgery, and the Canadian Society for Surgery of the Hand. It serves as a major venue for Canadian research, society guidelines, and continuing medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信