Andrew D Ablett, Conor McCann, Tony Feng, Victoria Macaskill, William M Oliver, John F Keating
{"title":"Cephalomedullary Nailing for Subtrochanteric and Reverse-Oblique Femoral Fractures: Comparison of a Single Versus Dual Lag Screw Device.","authors":"Andrew D Ablett, Conor McCann, Tony Feng, Victoria Macaskill, William M Oliver, John F Keating","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.24.00404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subtrochanteric proximal femoral fractures are generally treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation. We aimed to compare outcomes of subtrochanteric fracture fixation using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) or dual lag screw (INTERTAN nail, IN) device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome measure was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out or back-out, nail breakage, or peri-implant fracture. Secondary outcomes included reoperation for mechanical failure, deep infection, or nonunion, and technical predictors of mechanical failure. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with a subtrochanteric proximal femoral fracture treated at a single center were retrospectively identified using electronic records. All patients who underwent fixation using either a long GN (November 2010 to January 2017) or IN (March 2017 to April 2022) were included. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to identify operative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 587 patients were included: 336 in the GN group (median age, 82 years; 73% female) and 251 in the IN group (median age, 82 years; 71% female). The risk of mechanical failure was 3-fold higher in the GN group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.87; p = 0.010), with screw cut-out (p = 0.04) and back-out (p = 0.04) only observed in the GN group. We observed a greater risk of reoperation for mechanical failure in the GN group, but this did not achieve significance (aHR, 2.02; p = 0.16). Independent predictors of mechanical failure included varus malalignment of >5° for cut-out (aHR, 17.43; p = 0.012), a tip-to-apex distance of >25 mm for back-out (aHR, 9.47; p = 0.019), and shortening of >1 cm for peri-implant fracture (aHR, 5.44; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For older patients with subtrochanteric and reverse-oblique femoral fractures, the dual lag screw design of the IN nail was associated with a lower risk of mechanical failure compared with the single lag screw design of the GN nail.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.24.00404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Subtrochanteric proximal femoral fractures are generally treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation. We aimed to compare outcomes of subtrochanteric fracture fixation using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) or dual lag screw (INTERTAN nail, IN) device.
Methods: The primary outcome measure was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out or back-out, nail breakage, or peri-implant fracture. Secondary outcomes included reoperation for mechanical failure, deep infection, or nonunion, and technical predictors of mechanical failure. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with a subtrochanteric proximal femoral fracture treated at a single center were retrospectively identified using electronic records. All patients who underwent fixation using either a long GN (November 2010 to January 2017) or IN (March 2017 to April 2022) were included. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to identify operative complications.
Results: A total of 587 patients were included: 336 in the GN group (median age, 82 years; 73% female) and 251 in the IN group (median age, 82 years; 71% female). The risk of mechanical failure was 3-fold higher in the GN group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.87; p = 0.010), with screw cut-out (p = 0.04) and back-out (p = 0.04) only observed in the GN group. We observed a greater risk of reoperation for mechanical failure in the GN group, but this did not achieve significance (aHR, 2.02; p = 0.16). Independent predictors of mechanical failure included varus malalignment of >5° for cut-out (aHR, 17.43; p = 0.012), a tip-to-apex distance of >25 mm for back-out (aHR, 9.47; p = 0.019), and shortening of >1 cm for peri-implant fracture (aHR, 5.44; p = 0.001).
Conclusions: For older patients with subtrochanteric and reverse-oblique femoral fractures, the dual lag screw design of the IN nail was associated with a lower risk of mechanical failure compared with the single lag screw design of the GN nail.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) has been the most valued source of information for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers for over 125 years and is the gold standard in peer-reviewed scientific information in the field. A core journal and essential reading for general as well as specialist orthopaedic surgeons worldwide, The Journal publishes evidence-based research to enhance the quality of care for orthopaedic patients. Standards of excellence and high quality are maintained in everything we do, from the science of the content published to the customer service we provide. JBJS is an independent, non-profit journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
