Novel type 2 diabetes prediction score based on traditional risk factors and circulating metabolites: model derivation and validation in two large cohort studies.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102971
Ruijie Xie, Christian Herder, Sha Sha, Lei Peng, Hermann Brenner, Ben Schöttker
{"title":"Novel type 2 diabetes prediction score based on traditional risk factors and circulating metabolites: model derivation and validation in two large cohort studies.","authors":"Ruijie Xie, Christian Herder, Sha Sha, Lei Peng, Hermann Brenner, Ben Schöttker","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the incremental predictive value of metabolomic biomarkers for assessing the 10-year risk of type 2 diabetes when added to the clinical Cambridge Diabetes Risk Score (CDRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized 86,232 UK Biobank (UKB) participants (recruited between 13 March 2006 and 1 October 2010) for model derivation and internal validation. Additionally, we included 4383 participants from the German ESTHER cohort (recruited between 1 July 2000 and 30 June 2002 for external validation). Participants were followed up for 10 years to assess the incidence of type 2 diabetes. A total of 249 NMR-derived metabolites were quantified using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Metabolites were selected with LASSO regression and model performance was evaluated with Harrell's C-index.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>11 metabolomic biomarkers, including glycolysis related metabolites, ketone bodies, amino acids, and lipids, were selected. In internal validation within the UKB, adding these metabolites significantly increased the C-index (95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of the clinical CDRS from 0.815 (0.800, 0.829) to 0.834 (0.820, 0.847) and the continuous net reclassification index (NRI) with 95% CI was 39.8% (34.6%, 45.0%). External validation in the ESTHER cohort showed a comparable statistically significant C-index increase from 0.770 (0.750, 0.791) to 0.798 (0.779, 0.817) and a continuous NRI of 33.8% (26.4%, 41.2%). A concise model with 4 instead of 11 metabolites yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Adding 11 metabolites to the clinical CDRS led to a novel type 2 diabetes prediction model, we called UK Biobank Diabetes Risk Score (UKB-DRS), substantially outperformed the clinical CDRS. The concise version with 4 metabolites performed comparably. As only very few clinical information and a blood sample are needed for the UKB-DRS, and as high-throughput NMR metabolomics are becoming increasingly available at low costs, these models have considerable potential for routine clinical application in diabetes risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The ESTHER study was funded by grants from the Baden-Württemberg state Ministry of Science, Research and Arts (Stuttgart, Germany), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Berlin, Germany), the Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (Berlin, Germany), and the Saarland State Ministry of Health, Social Affairs, Women and the Family (Saarbrücken, Germany). The UK Biobank project was established through collaboration between various entities including the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, Department of Health, Scottish Government, and the Northwest Regional Development Agency. Additional funding was provided by the Welsh Assembly Government, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, and Diabetes UK, with support from the National Health Service (NHS). The German Diabetes Center is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (Berlin, Germany) and the Ministry of Culture and Science of the state North Rhine-Westphalia (Düsseldorf, Germany) and receives additional funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"102971"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102971","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the incremental predictive value of metabolomic biomarkers for assessing the 10-year risk of type 2 diabetes when added to the clinical Cambridge Diabetes Risk Score (CDRS).

Methods: We utilized 86,232 UK Biobank (UKB) participants (recruited between 13 March 2006 and 1 October 2010) for model derivation and internal validation. Additionally, we included 4383 participants from the German ESTHER cohort (recruited between 1 July 2000 and 30 June 2002 for external validation). Participants were followed up for 10 years to assess the incidence of type 2 diabetes. A total of 249 NMR-derived metabolites were quantified using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Metabolites were selected with LASSO regression and model performance was evaluated with Harrell's C-index.

Findings: 11 metabolomic biomarkers, including glycolysis related metabolites, ketone bodies, amino acids, and lipids, were selected. In internal validation within the UKB, adding these metabolites significantly increased the C-index (95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of the clinical CDRS from 0.815 (0.800, 0.829) to 0.834 (0.820, 0.847) and the continuous net reclassification index (NRI) with 95% CI was 39.8% (34.6%, 45.0%). External validation in the ESTHER cohort showed a comparable statistically significant C-index increase from 0.770 (0.750, 0.791) to 0.798 (0.779, 0.817) and a continuous NRI of 33.8% (26.4%, 41.2%). A concise model with 4 instead of 11 metabolites yielded similar results.

Interpretation: Adding 11 metabolites to the clinical CDRS led to a novel type 2 diabetes prediction model, we called UK Biobank Diabetes Risk Score (UKB-DRS), substantially outperformed the clinical CDRS. The concise version with 4 metabolites performed comparably. As only very few clinical information and a blood sample are needed for the UKB-DRS, and as high-throughput NMR metabolomics are becoming increasingly available at low costs, these models have considerable potential for routine clinical application in diabetes risk assessment.

Funding: The ESTHER study was funded by grants from the Baden-Württemberg state Ministry of Science, Research and Arts (Stuttgart, Germany), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Berlin, Germany), the Federal Ministry of Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (Berlin, Germany), and the Saarland State Ministry of Health, Social Affairs, Women and the Family (Saarbrücken, Germany). The UK Biobank project was established through collaboration between various entities including the Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council, Department of Health, Scottish Government, and the Northwest Regional Development Agency. Additional funding was provided by the Welsh Assembly Government, British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, and Diabetes UK, with support from the National Health Service (NHS). The German Diabetes Center is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health (Berlin, Germany) and the Ministry of Culture and Science of the state North Rhine-Westphalia (Düsseldorf, Germany) and receives additional funding from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.).

基于传统危险因素和循环代谢物的新型2型糖尿病预测评分:两项大型队列研究的模型推导和验证
背景:我们的目的是评估代谢组学生物标志物在临床剑桥糖尿病风险评分(CDRS)中用于评估2型糖尿病10年风险的增量预测价值。方法:我们利用86,232名英国生物银行(UKB)参与者(于2006年3月13日至2010年10月1日招募)进行模型推导和内部验证。此外,我们纳入了4383名来自德国ESTHER队列的参与者(在2000年7月1日至2002年6月30日期间招募,用于外部验证)。研究人员对参与者进行了10年的随访,以评估2型糖尿病的发病率。采用核磁共振(NMR)光谱法对249种核磁共振衍生代谢物进行了定量分析。用LASSO回归选择代谢物,用Harrell’s c指数评价模型性能。结果:11个代谢组学生物标志物,包括糖酵解相关代谢物、酮体、氨基酸和脂质。在UKB内部验证中,添加这些代谢物显著提高了临床CDRS的c -指数(95%可信区间(95% CI)),从0.815(0.800,0.829)提高到0.834(0.820,0.847),连续净重分类指数(NRI) 95% CI为39.8%(34.6%,45.0%)。在ESTHER队列中进行的外部验证显示,c指数从0.770(0.750,0.791)增加到0.798(0.779,0.817),连续NRI为33.8%(26.4%,41.2%),具有统计学意义。一个包含4种代谢物而不是11种代谢物的简洁模型也得到了类似的结果。解释:在临床CDRS中加入11种代谢物,形成了一种新的2型糖尿病预测模型,我们称之为UK Biobank糖尿病风险评分(UKB-DRS),其表现明显优于临床CDRS。具有4种代谢物的简明版本具有可比性。由于UKB-DRS只需要很少的临床信息和血液样本,并且随着高通量NMR代谢组学越来越多地以低成本获得,这些模型在糖尿病风险评估的常规临床应用中具有相当大的潜力。资金:ESTHER研究由巴登-符腾堡州科学、研究和艺术部(德国斯图加特)、联邦教育和研究部(德国柏林)、联邦家庭事务、老年公民、妇女和青年部(德国柏林)和萨尔州卫生、社会事务、妇女和家庭部(德国萨尔布尔肯)资助。联合王国生物银行项目是通过威康信托基金、医学研究理事会、卫生部、苏格兰政府和西北地区开发署等各实体之间的合作建立的。威尔士议会政府、英国心脏基金会、英国癌症研究中心和英国糖尿病中心提供了额外的资金,并得到了国家卫生服务(NHS)的支持。德国糖尿病中心由德国联邦卫生部(德国柏林)和北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚州文化和科学部(德国塞尔多夫)资助,并通过德国糖尿病研究中心(DZD e.v.)获得德国联邦教育和研究部(BMBF)的额外资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信