Investigation of the Impact Response of Bi-Continuous Nanoporous Solids via the Material Point Method: Verification Against Molecular Dynamics Predictions

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Yu-Chen Su, Mohammed H. Saffarini, Tommy Sewell, Zhen Chen
{"title":"Investigation of the Impact Response of Bi-Continuous Nanoporous Solids via the Material Point Method: Verification Against Molecular Dynamics Predictions","authors":"Yu-Chen Su,&nbsp;Mohammed H. Saffarini,&nbsp;Tommy Sewell,&nbsp;Zhen Chen","doi":"10.1002/nag.3925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Molecular dynamics (MD) and the material point method (MPM) are both particle methods in spatial discretization. Molecular dynamics is a discrete particle method that is widely applied to predict fundamental physical properties and dynamic materials behaviors at nanoscale. The MPM is a continuum-based particle method that was proposed about three decades ago to simulate large-deformation problems involving multiphase interaction and failure evolution beyond the nanoscale. However, it is still a challenging task to validate MD responses against the experimental data due to the spatial limitation in impact and/or shock tests. The objective of this investigation is therefore to compare the MPM and MD solutions for the impact responses of porous solids at nanoscale. Since the governing equations for MD and explicit MPM are similar in temporal domain with different spatial discretization schemes, the MPM solutions could be verified against the MD ones, and the MD solutions might then be indirectly validated against the MPM ones as validated beyond the nanoscale. Since both MD forcing functions and MPM constitutive modeling are well-formulated for metallic solids, we report a comprehensive comparative study of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>nm</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$40\\ \\times \\ 40\\ \\times \\ 40\\ {\\mathrm{nm}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> porous and non-porous gold cubic targets impacted by full density non-porous gold cubic flyers using the MPM and MD, respectively. The overall deformation patterns and particle-velocity histories are demonstrated and analyzed, as obtained with the two particle methods. It appears that the MD and MPM solutions are consistent in capturing the physical responses, which shows the potential of using the MPM for multiscale simulations of extreme events involving porous solids, such as underground penetration and space exploration. In addition, MD solutions might be indirectly validated against the MPM ones for evaluating geological responses to extreme loadings, which provides an alternative route for multiscale verification and validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 4","pages":"1200-1215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.3925","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) and the material point method (MPM) are both particle methods in spatial discretization. Molecular dynamics is a discrete particle method that is widely applied to predict fundamental physical properties and dynamic materials behaviors at nanoscale. The MPM is a continuum-based particle method that was proposed about three decades ago to simulate large-deformation problems involving multiphase interaction and failure evolution beyond the nanoscale. However, it is still a challenging task to validate MD responses against the experimental data due to the spatial limitation in impact and/or shock tests. The objective of this investigation is therefore to compare the MPM and MD solutions for the impact responses of porous solids at nanoscale. Since the governing equations for MD and explicit MPM are similar in temporal domain with different spatial discretization schemes, the MPM solutions could be verified against the MD ones, and the MD solutions might then be indirectly validated against the MPM ones as validated beyond the nanoscale. Since both MD forcing functions and MPM constitutive modeling are well-formulated for metallic solids, we report a comprehensive comparative study of 40 × 40 × 40 nm $40\ \times \ 40\ \times \ 40\ {\mathrm{nm}}$ porous and non-porous gold cubic targets impacted by full density non-porous gold cubic flyers using the MPM and MD, respectively. The overall deformation patterns and particle-velocity histories are demonstrated and analyzed, as obtained with the two particle methods. It appears that the MD and MPM solutions are consistent in capturing the physical responses, which shows the potential of using the MPM for multiscale simulations of extreme events involving porous solids, such as underground penetration and space exploration. In addition, MD solutions might be indirectly validated against the MPM ones for evaluating geological responses to extreme loadings, which provides an alternative route for multiscale verification and validation.

Abstract Image

材料点法研究双连续纳米多孔固体的冲击响应:对分子动力学预测的验证
分子动力学(MD)和物质点法(MPM)都是空间离散的粒子方法。分子动力学是一种离散粒子方法,广泛应用于预测纳米尺度下材料的基本物理性质和动态行为。MPM是一种基于连续介质的颗粒方法,大约在三十年前提出,用于模拟涉及多相相互作用和纳米尺度以外的破坏演化的大变形问题。然而,由于碰撞和/或冲击试验的空间限制,根据实验数据验证MD响应仍然是一项具有挑战性的任务。因此,本研究的目的是比较多孔固体在纳米尺度上的冲击响应的MPM和MD溶液。由于MD和显式MPM的控制方程在时域上是相似的,但不同的空间离散化方案,因此MPM解可以与MD解进行验证,而MD解可以间接地与MPM解进行验证,从而超越纳米尺度。由于MD强迫函数和MPM本构模型都可以很好地描述金属固体,我们报告了一项全面的比较研究,分别使用MPM和MD对多孔和非多孔金立方靶进行了全密度非多孔金立方靶的影响。整体变形模式和粒子速度的历史证明和分析,得到了两种粒子方法。MD和MPM解决方案在捕获物理响应方面是一致的,这表明MPM在涉及多孔固体的极端事件的多尺度模拟中具有潜力,例如地下渗透和空间探索。此外,MD解决方案可以与MPM解决方案间接验证,以评估极端载荷下的地质响应,这为多尺度验证和验证提供了另一种途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信