Investigation of the Impact Response of Bi-Continuous Nanoporous Solids via the Material Point Method: Verification Against Molecular Dynamics Predictions
Yu-Chen Su, Mohammed H. Saffarini, Tommy Sewell, Zhen Chen
{"title":"Investigation of the Impact Response of Bi-Continuous Nanoporous Solids via the Material Point Method: Verification Against Molecular Dynamics Predictions","authors":"Yu-Chen Su, Mohammed H. Saffarini, Tommy Sewell, Zhen Chen","doi":"10.1002/nag.3925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Molecular dynamics (MD) and the material point method (MPM) are both particle methods in spatial discretization. Molecular dynamics is a discrete particle method that is widely applied to predict fundamental physical properties and dynamic materials behaviors at nanoscale. The MPM is a continuum-based particle method that was proposed about three decades ago to simulate large-deformation problems involving multiphase interaction and failure evolution beyond the nanoscale. However, it is still a challenging task to validate MD responses against the experimental data due to the spatial limitation in impact and/or shock tests. The objective of this investigation is therefore to compare the MPM and MD solutions for the impact responses of porous solids at nanoscale. Since the governing equations for MD and explicit MPM are similar in temporal domain with different spatial discretization schemes, the MPM solutions could be verified against the MD ones, and the MD solutions might then be indirectly validated against the MPM ones as validated beyond the nanoscale. Since both MD forcing functions and MPM constitutive modeling are well-formulated for metallic solids, we report a comprehensive comparative study of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>×</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mi>nm</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$40\\ \\times \\ 40\\ \\times \\ 40\\ {\\mathrm{nm}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> porous and non-porous gold cubic targets impacted by full density non-porous gold cubic flyers using the MPM and MD, respectively. The overall deformation patterns and particle-velocity histories are demonstrated and analyzed, as obtained with the two particle methods. It appears that the MD and MPM solutions are consistent in capturing the physical responses, which shows the potential of using the MPM for multiscale simulations of extreme events involving porous solids, such as underground penetration and space exploration. In addition, MD solutions might be indirectly validated against the MPM ones for evaluating geological responses to extreme loadings, which provides an alternative route for multiscale verification and validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 4","pages":"1200-1215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nag.3925","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.3925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) and the material point method (MPM) are both particle methods in spatial discretization. Molecular dynamics is a discrete particle method that is widely applied to predict fundamental physical properties and dynamic materials behaviors at nanoscale. The MPM is a continuum-based particle method that was proposed about three decades ago to simulate large-deformation problems involving multiphase interaction and failure evolution beyond the nanoscale. However, it is still a challenging task to validate MD responses against the experimental data due to the spatial limitation in impact and/or shock tests. The objective of this investigation is therefore to compare the MPM and MD solutions for the impact responses of porous solids at nanoscale. Since the governing equations for MD and explicit MPM are similar in temporal domain with different spatial discretization schemes, the MPM solutions could be verified against the MD ones, and the MD solutions might then be indirectly validated against the MPM ones as validated beyond the nanoscale. Since both MD forcing functions and MPM constitutive modeling are well-formulated for metallic solids, we report a comprehensive comparative study of porous and non-porous gold cubic targets impacted by full density non-porous gold cubic flyers using the MPM and MD, respectively. The overall deformation patterns and particle-velocity histories are demonstrated and analyzed, as obtained with the two particle methods. It appears that the MD and MPM solutions are consistent in capturing the physical responses, which shows the potential of using the MPM for multiscale simulations of extreme events involving porous solids, such as underground penetration and space exploration. In addition, MD solutions might be indirectly validated against the MPM ones for evaluating geological responses to extreme loadings, which provides an alternative route for multiscale verification and validation.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.