[Evaluation of Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX, a Rapid Diagnostic Kit for Simultaneous Detection of Clostridioides difficile Antigen and Toxin A/B, in Fecal Specimens].

Nohara Tsukamoto, Yumiko Funashima, Norito Yoshida, Airi Ishikawa, Taeko Narita, Shoko Iyonaga, Hisae Nakashima, Kenichi Sato, Kentaro Wakamatsu, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura
{"title":"[Evaluation of Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX, a Rapid Diagnostic Kit for Simultaneous Detection of <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Antigen and Toxin A/B, in Fecal Specimens].","authors":"Nohara Tsukamoto, Yumiko Funashima, Norito Yoshida, Airi Ishikawa, Taeko Narita, Shoko Iyonaga, Hisae Nakashima, Kenichi Sato, Kentaro Wakamatsu, Zenzo Nagasawa, Tsukuru Umemura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infections, highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test kits are necessary for prompt diagnose and infection control. In this study, we evaluated \"Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX\" (evaluation kit), a rapid diagnostic kit for <i>C. difficile</i>, using 65 clinical stool specimens, comparing with GE test immunochromato-CD GDH/TOX \"Nissui\" (GE test) and TECHLAB <i>C. DIFF</i> QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QUIK CHEK). The results of the evaluation kit showed a high concordance rate; 100% the positive concordance rate (31/31) and 97.1% the negative concordance rate (33/34) of GDH, 94.1% the positive concordance rate (16/17) and 97.9% the negative concordance rate (47/48) of toxin against GE test, respectively. Also 96.9% the positive concordance rate (31/32) and 97.0% the negative concordance rate (32/33) of GDH, 100% the positive concordance rate (12/12) and 90.6% the negative concordance rate (48/53) of toxin against QUIK CHEK, respectively. Additionally, comparison of discrepancy cases between kits based on Nucleic Acid Amplification test, one false negative each for GDH and toxin in the evaluation kit, two false negatives for GDH and one false negative for toxin in the GE test, one false negative for GDH and six false negatives for toxin in QUIK CHEK, and no false positive cases were observed. Therefore, the detection sensitivity of GDH and toxin of the evaluation kit was equivalent to that of two types of comparative kits.</p>","PeriodicalId":74740,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho Biseibutsu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai shi = JARMAM : Journal of the Association for Rapid Method and Automation in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For Clostridioides difficile infections, highly sensitive rapid diagnostic test kits are necessary for prompt diagnose and infection control. In this study, we evaluated "Quick Chaser CD GDH/TOX" (evaluation kit), a rapid diagnostic kit for C. difficile, using 65 clinical stool specimens, comparing with GE test immunochromato-CD GDH/TOX "Nissui" (GE test) and TECHLAB C. DIFF QUIK CHEK COMPLETE (QUIK CHEK). The results of the evaluation kit showed a high concordance rate; 100% the positive concordance rate (31/31) and 97.1% the negative concordance rate (33/34) of GDH, 94.1% the positive concordance rate (16/17) and 97.9% the negative concordance rate (47/48) of toxin against GE test, respectively. Also 96.9% the positive concordance rate (31/32) and 97.0% the negative concordance rate (32/33) of GDH, 100% the positive concordance rate (12/12) and 90.6% the negative concordance rate (48/53) of toxin against QUIK CHEK, respectively. Additionally, comparison of discrepancy cases between kits based on Nucleic Acid Amplification test, one false negative each for GDH and toxin in the evaluation kit, two false negatives for GDH and one false negative for toxin in the GE test, one false negative for GDH and six false negatives for toxin in QUIK CHEK, and no false positive cases were observed. Therefore, the detection sensitivity of GDH and toxin of the evaluation kit was equivalent to that of two types of comparative kits.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信