Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure.

Interventional Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100528
Andrew R Stephens, Nicholas R Bender, Jim M Snyder, Rajeev K Patel, Ramzi El-Hassan
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure.","authors":"Andrew R Stephens, Nicholas R Bender, Jim M Snyder, Rajeev K Patel, Ramzi El-Hassan","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections (CIESI) are frequently used to treat cervical radiculopathy due to cervical nerve root impingement.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of CIESI for patients with cervical radiculopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients with cervical radicular pain and corroborative cervical spondylotic foraminal stenosis on MRI that failed at least 6 weeks of conservative management consisting of medication and physical rehabilitation seen at a multidisciplinary, tertiary academic spine center. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of Physical Function (PF) v1.2/v2.0 and Pain Interference (PI) v1.1 were collected at all patient visits. Scores were recorded at baseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-procedure. Statistical analysis comparing baseline scores with follow-up postprocedural PROMIS scores was performed. The percentage of patients reporting improvement greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated for responders and for the worst case scenario.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>179 patients met inclusion criteria. PROMIS PI at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up statistically improved by 1.5 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.4-1.6; p = 0.02), 1.5 (95 % CI 1.4-1.6; p = 0.03) and 1.7 (95 % CI 1.6-1.8; p = 0.4), respectively. Follow-up PROMIS PF at 3-month follow-up improved by 1.6 (95 % CI 1.5-1.7; p = 0.04) but did not significantly differ at 6- or 12-month follow-up. The percentage of patients that exceeded MCID thresholds of clinical significance was 44 % (95 % CI 36%-53 %) at 3-months, 49 % (95 % CI 39%-59 %) at 6-months, and 54 % (95 % CI 41%-66 %) at 12-months. Worst case scenario analysis demonstrated that 32 % (95 % CI 36%-53 %) of patients exceeded the MCID thresholds at 3-months, 31 % (95 % CI 24%-37 %) at 6-months, and 21 % (95 % CI 15%-27 %) at 12-months.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that CIESI leads to an improvement in function and pain for patients with cervical radiculopathy. This study was limited by retrospective design, loss to follow-up, and variation in steroids used.</p>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"3 4","pages":"100528"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11664393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections (CIESI) are frequently used to treat cervical radiculopathy due to cervical nerve root impingement.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of CIESI for patients with cervical radiculopathy.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive adult patients with cervical radicular pain and corroborative cervical spondylotic foraminal stenosis on MRI that failed at least 6 weeks of conservative management consisting of medication and physical rehabilitation seen at a multidisciplinary, tertiary academic spine center. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of Physical Function (PF) v1.2/v2.0 and Pain Interference (PI) v1.1 were collected at all patient visits. Scores were recorded at baseline, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months post-procedure. Statistical analysis comparing baseline scores with follow-up postprocedural PROMIS scores was performed. The percentage of patients reporting improvement greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated for responders and for the worst case scenario.

Results: 179 patients met inclusion criteria. PROMIS PI at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up statistically improved by 1.5 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.4-1.6; p = 0.02), 1.5 (95 % CI 1.4-1.6; p = 0.03) and 1.7 (95 % CI 1.6-1.8; p = 0.4), respectively. Follow-up PROMIS PF at 3-month follow-up improved by 1.6 (95 % CI 1.5-1.7; p = 0.04) but did not significantly differ at 6- or 12-month follow-up. The percentage of patients that exceeded MCID thresholds of clinical significance was 44 % (95 % CI 36%-53 %) at 3-months, 49 % (95 % CI 39%-59 %) at 6-months, and 54 % (95 % CI 41%-66 %) at 12-months. Worst case scenario analysis demonstrated that 32 % (95 % CI 36%-53 %) of patients exceeded the MCID thresholds at 3-months, 31 % (95 % CI 24%-37 %) at 6-months, and 21 % (95 % CI 15%-27 %) at 12-months.

Discussion/conclusions: Our study demonstrated that CIESI leads to an improvement in function and pain for patients with cervical radiculopathy. This study was limited by retrospective design, loss to follow-up, and variation in steroids used.

评估硬膜外类固醇注射对颈椎神经根病的有效性,以PROMIS作为结果测量。
背景:颈椎椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射(CIESI)常用于治疗由颈神经根撞击引起的颈椎神经根病。目的:评价CIESI对颈椎病患者的治疗效果。方法:我们对在多学科三级学术脊柱中心接受至少6周保守治疗(包括药物治疗和物理康复)失败的连续成年颈椎根状痛和MRI确证的椎间孔狭窄患者进行了回顾性研究。在所有患者就诊时收集患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)身体功能(PF) v1.2/v2.0和疼痛干扰(PI) v1.1域。在基线、术后3个月、6个月和12个月记录评分。比较基线评分与随访术后PROMIS评分进行统计分析。对于应答者和最坏情况,报告改善大于最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者百分比进行了计算。结果:179例患者符合纳入标准。3个月、6个月和12个月的PROMIS PI在统计学上提高了1.5(95%可信区间[CI] 1.4-1.6;p = 0.02), 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.6;p = 0.03)和1.7 (95% CI 1.6-1.8;P = 0.4)。随访3个月时PROMIS PF改善1.6 (95% CI 1.5-1.7;P = 0.04),但在6个月或12个月的随访中差异无统计学意义。超过MCID临床意义阈值的患者百分比在3个月时为44% (95% CI 36%- 53%), 6个月时为49% (95% CI 39%- 59%), 12个月时为54% (95% CI 41%- 66%)。最坏情况分析表明,32% (95% CI 36%- 53%)的患者在3个月时超过了MCID阈值,31% (95% CI 24%- 37%)的患者在6个月时超过了阈值,21% (95% CI 15%- 27%)的患者在12个月时超过了阈值。讨论/结论:我们的研究表明CIESI可以改善颈神经根病患者的功能和疼痛。这项研究受到回顾性设计、随访缺失和使用类固醇的差异的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信