Restrictive versus Liberal Transfusion in Myocardial Infarction - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400223
Jeffrey L Carson, Dean A Fergusson, Helaine Noveck, Ranjeeta Mallick, Tabassome Simon, Sunil V Rao, Howard Cooper, Simon J Stanworth, Gerard T Portela, Gregory Ducrocq, Marnie Bertolet, Andrew P DeFilippis, Andrew M Goldsweig, Sarang Kim, Darrell J Triulzi, Mark A Menegus, J Dawn Abbott, Renato D Lopes, Maria Mori Brooks, John H Alexander, Paul C Hébert, Shaun G Goodman, P Gabriel Steg
{"title":"Restrictive versus Liberal Transfusion in Myocardial Infarction - A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jeffrey L Carson, Dean A Fergusson, Helaine Noveck, Ranjeeta Mallick, Tabassome Simon, Sunil V Rao, Howard Cooper, Simon J Stanworth, Gerard T Portela, Gregory Ducrocq, Marnie Bertolet, Andrew P DeFilippis, Andrew M Goldsweig, Sarang Kim, Darrell J Triulzi, Mark A Menegus, J Dawn Abbott, Renato D Lopes, Maria Mori Brooks, John H Alexander, Paul C Hébert, Shaun G Goodman, P Gabriel Steg","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines have concluded that there are insufficient data to provide recommendations for the hemoglobin threshold for the use of red cell transfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia. After the recent publication of the Myocardial Infarction and Transfusion (MINT) trial, we performed an individual patient-level data meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted searches in major databases. Eligible trials randomly assigned patients with MI and anemia to either a restrictive (i.e., transfusion threshold of 7-8 g/dl) or liberal (i.e., transfusion threshold of 10 g/dl) red cell transfusion strategy. We used individual patient data from each trial. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality or MI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4311 patients from four trials. The primary outcome occurred in 334 patients (15.4%) in the restrictive strategy and 296 patients (13.8%) in the liberal strategy (relative risk [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.30). Death at 30 days occurred in 9.3% of patients in the restrictive strategy and in 8.1% of patients in the liberal strategy (RR 1.15, 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.39). Cardiac death at 30 days occurred in 5.5% of patients in the restrictive strategy and in 3.7% of patients in the liberal strategy (RR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.94). Heart failure (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.13) was similar in the transfusion strategies. All-cause mortality at 6 months occurred in 20.5% of patients in the restrictive strategy compared with 19.1% of patients in the liberal strategy (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pooling individual patient data from four trials did not find a definitive difference in our primary composite outcome of MI or death at 30 days. At 6 months, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with increased all-cause mortality. (Partially funded by a grant from the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL171977].).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2400223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines have concluded that there are insufficient data to provide recommendations for the hemoglobin threshold for the use of red cell transfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and anemia. After the recent publication of the Myocardial Infarction and Transfusion (MINT) trial, we performed an individual patient-level data meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion strategies.

Methods: We conducted searches in major databases. Eligible trials randomly assigned patients with MI and anemia to either a restrictive (i.e., transfusion threshold of 7-8 g/dl) or liberal (i.e., transfusion threshold of 10 g/dl) red cell transfusion strategy. We used individual patient data from each trial. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality or MI.

Results: We included 4311 patients from four trials. The primary outcome occurred in 334 patients (15.4%) in the restrictive strategy and 296 patients (13.8%) in the liberal strategy (relative risk [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.30). Death at 30 days occurred in 9.3% of patients in the restrictive strategy and in 8.1% of patients in the liberal strategy (RR 1.15, 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.39). Cardiac death at 30 days occurred in 5.5% of patients in the restrictive strategy and in 3.7% of patients in the liberal strategy (RR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.94). Heart failure (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.13) was similar in the transfusion strategies. All-cause mortality at 6 months occurred in 20.5% of patients in the restrictive strategy compared with 19.1% of patients in the liberal strategy (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.11).

Conclusions: Pooling individual patient data from four trials did not find a definitive difference in our primary composite outcome of MI or death at 30 days. At 6 months, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with increased all-cause mortality. (Partially funded by a grant from the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL171977].).

限制与自由输血在心肌梗死患者水平上的荟萃分析。
背景:临床指南已经得出结论,没有足够的数据来为急性心肌梗死(MI)和贫血患者使用红细胞输血的血红蛋白阈值提供建议。在心肌梗死和输血(MINT)试验最近发表后,我们进行了一项个体患者水平的数据荟萃分析,以评估限制性和自由输血策略的效果。方法:在主要数据库中进行检索。符合条件的试验将心肌梗死和贫血患者随机分配到限制性(即输血阈值为7-8 g/dl)或自由(即输血阈值为10 g/dl)红细胞输血策略。我们使用来自每个试验的个体患者数据。主要结局是30天死亡率或心肌梗死的综合结果。结果:我们纳入了来自4项试验的4311例患者。限制性治疗组有334例(15.4%)患者出现主要结局,自由治疗组有296例(13.8%)患者出现主要结局(相对危险度[RR] 1.13, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.97 ~ 1.30)。限制性治疗组30天死亡发生率为9.3%,自由治疗组为8.1% (RR 1.15, 95% CI, 0.95 ~ 1.39)。限制性治疗组30天心脏死亡发生率为5.5%,自由治疗组为3.7% (RR 1.47, 95% CI, 1.11 ~ 1.94)。心力衰竭(RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.70 ~ 1.13)在输血策略上相似。限制性治疗组6个月时全因死亡率为20.5%,而自由治疗组为19.1%(风险比1.08,95% CI, 1.05 ~ 1.11)。结论:汇总来自4个试验的单个患者数据并没有发现心肌梗死或30天死亡的主要综合结局有明确的差异。在6个月时,限制性输血策略与全因死亡率增加有关。(部分资金来自美国国家心肺血液研究所[R01HL171977]。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信