BComparison of supraglottic airway device vs. endotracheal intubation for initial airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"BComparison of supraglottic airway device vs. endotracheal intubation for initial airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yan Tao, Juxia Zhang, Lei Feng","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2446384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is characterized by the cessation of mechanical cardiac activity and voluntary circulation occurring outside of a hospital setting, making it the leading cause of death worldwide. Recently, the optimal approach to airway management has been a subject of controversy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Follow PRISMA guidelines for systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. The primary outcome was survival assessed by 4 measures: Restoration of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital or emergency department, evaluation of functional recovery after PCR (measured at both discharge and 3 months after PCR), and neurological function score at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6 RCTs (14,205 patients) were included in the systematic review and 4 RCTs (13,053 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. 5 studies (83.3%)of RCTs with ETI controls were notable for their high quality, with low risk of bias judged in all 7 domains of the risk assessment scale. Showed an advantage of SGA (compared to ETI) with potential for ROSC (95% CI [1.02 to 1.18], I<sup>2</sup> = 48%, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and survival to hospital or emergency department(95% CI [1.01 to 1.17], I<sup>2</sup> = 12%, <i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant association between SGA and the possibility of obtaining ROSC and reaching the hospital or emergency department after CPR in OHCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2446384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is characterized by the cessation of mechanical cardiac activity and voluntary circulation occurring outside of a hospital setting, making it the leading cause of death worldwide. Recently, the optimal approach to airway management has been a subject of controversy.
Methods: Follow PRISMA guidelines for systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. The primary outcome was survival assessed by 4 measures: Restoration of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital or emergency department, evaluation of functional recovery after PCR (measured at both discharge and 3 months after PCR), and neurological function score at discharge.
Results: A total of 6 RCTs (14,205 patients) were included in the systematic review and 4 RCTs (13,053 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. 5 studies (83.3%)of RCTs with ETI controls were notable for their high quality, with low risk of bias judged in all 7 domains of the risk assessment scale. Showed an advantage of SGA (compared to ETI) with potential for ROSC (95% CI [1.02 to 1.18], I2 = 48%, p = 0.01) and survival to hospital or emergency department(95% CI [1.01 to 1.17], I2 = 12%, p = 0.02).
Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant association between SGA and the possibility of obtaining ROSC and reaching the hospital or emergency department after CPR in OHCA.