Examining the Influence of Optimal Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults With Heart Failure.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Windy W Alonso, Bunny J Pozehl, Kevin A Kupzyk, Scott W Lundgren, Theresa Diederich
{"title":"Examining the Influence of Optimal Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults With Heart Failure.","authors":"Windy W Alonso, Bunny J Pozehl, Kevin A Kupzyk, Scott W Lundgren, Theresa Diederich","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multidrug, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) improves mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure (HF), but little is known about how optimization of multidrug GDMT influences patient-reported outcomes. Trials of single GDMT medications demonstrate improvements in patient-reported outcomes; however, the effect of the multidrug GDMT regimen on patient-reported outcomes is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine how multidrug optimization during a multidisciplinary, advanced practice provider HF clinic impacted patient-reported symptoms and quality of life in adults with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined patient-reported outcomes at baseline and 12 weeks during a multidrug GDMT optimization clinic for HF. Outcomes were compared across time and male and female sex. Quality of life was measured with the EQ5D. Symptoms were measured using the PROMIS-29 and PROMIS-Dyspnea Severity score. Descriptive statistics describe sample characteristics. Paired and independent t tests were used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 301 adults with HF enrolled in a clinic, 101 completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and 12 weeks. Patients (predominantly White/Caucasian males; mean age, 59 years) reported significant improvement in the EQ5D domains of mobility and performance of usual activities, and PROMIS-29 subscales for physical function, fatigue, and ability to participate in social roles. Sex differences were noted for pain and depression, with females reporting improved pain and males reporting slightly less depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary, advanced practice provider-led optimization clinics can promote optimization of multidrug GDMT that can improve patient-reported outcomes in adults with HF. Future studies are needed to comprehensively examine sex differences in patient-reported response to GDMT and patient-reported response to updated, \"quadruple-therapy\" GDMT recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001160","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multidrug, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) improves mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure (HF), but little is known about how optimization of multidrug GDMT influences patient-reported outcomes. Trials of single GDMT medications demonstrate improvements in patient-reported outcomes; however, the effect of the multidrug GDMT regimen on patient-reported outcomes is unclear.

Objective: The objective of this study is to determine how multidrug optimization during a multidisciplinary, advanced practice provider HF clinic impacted patient-reported symptoms and quality of life in adults with HF.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined patient-reported outcomes at baseline and 12 weeks during a multidrug GDMT optimization clinic for HF. Outcomes were compared across time and male and female sex. Quality of life was measured with the EQ5D. Symptoms were measured using the PROMIS-29 and PROMIS-Dyspnea Severity score. Descriptive statistics describe sample characteristics. Paired and independent t tests were used for comparisons.

Results: Of 301 adults with HF enrolled in a clinic, 101 completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and 12 weeks. Patients (predominantly White/Caucasian males; mean age, 59 years) reported significant improvement in the EQ5D domains of mobility and performance of usual activities, and PROMIS-29 subscales for physical function, fatigue, and ability to participate in social roles. Sex differences were noted for pain and depression, with females reporting improved pain and males reporting slightly less depression.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary, advanced practice provider-led optimization clinics can promote optimization of multidrug GDMT that can improve patient-reported outcomes in adults with HF. Future studies are needed to comprehensively examine sex differences in patient-reported response to GDMT and patient-reported response to updated, "quadruple-therapy" GDMT recommendations.

检查最佳指南指导的药物治疗对成人心力衰竭患者报告结果的影响
背景:多药物、指南导向的药物治疗(GDMT)可提高心力衰竭(HF)的死亡率和住院率,但对多药物GDMT优化如何影响患者报告的结果知之甚少。单一GDMT药物的试验表明,患者报告的结果有所改善;然而,多药GDMT方案对患者报告的结果的影响尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是确定在多学科、高级实践提供者心衰临床中,多药物优化如何影响成人心衰患者报告的症状和生活质量。方法:这项回顾性队列研究检查了在多药GDMT优化临床治疗心衰期间基线和12周患者报告的结果。结果在时间和性别上进行了比较。用EQ5D测量生活质量。使用promise -29和promise -呼吸困难严重程度评分来测量症状。描述性统计描述样本特征。采用配对和独立t检验进行比较。结果:在301名HF成人患者中,101人在基线和12周完成了患者报告的结果测量。患者(主要是白人/高加索男性;平均年龄59岁)报告了在流动性和日常活动表现的EQ5D领域以及身体功能、疲劳和参与社会角色能力的promise -29亚量表的显著改善。在疼痛和抑郁方面存在性别差异,女性报告疼痛有所改善,而男性报告抑郁程度略有减轻。结论:多学科、先进的实践提供者主导的优化诊所可以促进多药GDMT的优化,从而改善成人心衰患者报告的结果。未来的研究需要全面检查患者报告对GDMT的反应和患者报告对更新的“四联疗法”GDMT建议的反应的性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信