The demand for assistive technology, services, and satisfaction self-reports among people with disabilities in China.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Panpan Chen, Binglong Wang, Zhimin Hu, Xiaoping Qin, Hujun Wang, Zhiyuan Hu, Xidong Liu, Yu Li
{"title":"The demand for assistive technology, services, and satisfaction self-reports among people with disabilities in China.","authors":"Panpan Chen, Binglong Wang, Zhimin Hu, Xiaoping Qin, Hujun Wang, Zhiyuan Hu, Xidong Liu, Yu Li","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2442711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Assistive device non-use among individuals with disabilities is often attributed to issues in service provision and user satisfaction with assistive devices. However, systematic research on the service quality and satisfaction of assistive devices among disabled populations is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the service delivery and satisfaction of assistive devices among individuals with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was employed in this study to examine the self-reported needs and usage of assistive devices by people with disabilities in China and to explore the relationship between service provision and satisfaction with assistive devices. Additionally, potential mechanisms underlying this relationship were evaluated. The World Health Organization's Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) questionnaire was utilized, and stratified sampling was employed. A total of 872 individuals with disabilities living in China were interviewed. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the independent and interactive relationships between service provision and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reported demand for assistive technology was associated with the type of disability. Pre-fitting evaluation and training services were positively correlated with satisfaction (<i>β</i>=0.514, <i>p</i><0.05). However, no significant effect of post-fitting maintenance services on product satisfaction was found, and the moderating effect of service convenience was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policy formulation can adjust resource allocation based on the composition of its disabled population. Priority should be given to providing mobility aids and other basic equipment for people with multiple disabilities to enhance the effectiveness and pertinence of assistive services. The capacity for post-installation maintenance of assistive technologies and the accessibility of services should be improved to ensure that disabled people can continuously benefit from assistive devices. Extensive educational and publicity activities should be carried out to raise people's awareness of the importance of pre-assembly assessment, training services, and post-assembly maintenance services. The importance of disease prevention, early intervention, and rehabilitation to reduce the disability rate has been emphasized.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2442711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Assistive device non-use among individuals with disabilities is often attributed to issues in service provision and user satisfaction with assistive devices. However, systematic research on the service quality and satisfaction of assistive devices among disabled populations is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the service delivery and satisfaction of assistive devices among individuals with disabilities.

Method: The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was employed in this study to examine the self-reported needs and usage of assistive devices by people with disabilities in China and to explore the relationship between service provision and satisfaction with assistive devices. Additionally, potential mechanisms underlying this relationship were evaluated. The World Health Organization's Rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) questionnaire was utilized, and stratified sampling was employed. A total of 872 individuals with disabilities living in China were interviewed. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the independent and interactive relationships between service provision and satisfaction.

Results: Self-reported demand for assistive technology was associated with the type of disability. Pre-fitting evaluation and training services were positively correlated with satisfaction (β=0.514, p<0.05). However, no significant effect of post-fitting maintenance services on product satisfaction was found, and the moderating effect of service convenience was not significant.

Conclusions: Policy formulation can adjust resource allocation based on the composition of its disabled population. Priority should be given to providing mobility aids and other basic equipment for people with multiple disabilities to enhance the effectiveness and pertinence of assistive services. The capacity for post-installation maintenance of assistive technologies and the accessibility of services should be improved to ensure that disabled people can continuously benefit from assistive devices. Extensive educational and publicity activities should be carried out to raise people's awareness of the importance of pre-assembly assessment, training services, and post-assembly maintenance services. The importance of disease prevention, early intervention, and rehabilitation to reduce the disability rate has been emphasized.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信